Abstracts
Abstract
The European Commission recently reformed the statutory audit market in order to improve its competitiveness. We employ resource dependence theory to understand the position of audit firms with regard to the policy options considered. By using content analysis to examine consultation responses, we show that, despite the existing market segmentation, all sizes of firm adopt similar positions, except on the topic of audit consortia. The differences in firms’ access to resources, particularly with respect to human capital, help to explain these positions, which perpetuate supply concentration in the market.
Keywords:
- European reform,
- market structure,
- audit firms,
- resource dependence theory
Résumé
La Commission européenne a récemment mené une réforme de l’audit légal afin d’améliorer la compétitivité du marché. Nous mobilisons la théorie de la dépendance vis-à-vis des ressources afin de comprendre la position des cabinets d’audit au regard des options politiques envisagées. A partir d’une analyse de contenu des réponses à une consultation, les résultats montrent qu’en dépit d’une segmentation de marché existante, toutes les tailles de cabinet adoptent des positions similaires, excepté sur les consortiums d’audit. Les différences d’accès aux ressources entre types de cabinet, notamment en capital humain, permettent de comprendre ces positions qui pérennisent la concentration de l’offre.
Mots-clés :
- réforme européenne,
- structure de marché,
- cabinets d’audit,
- théorie de la dépendance vis-à-vis des ressources
Resumen
La Comisión Europea ha realizado recientemente una reforma en materia de auditoría legal con el fin de mejorar la competencia de ese mercado. Movilizamos la teoría de dependencia de recursos con el fin de entender la posición de las firmas de auditoría en relación con las opciones políticas consideradas. A partir de un análisis de contenido de respuestas a una consulta, los resultados muestran que, a pesar de una segmentación de mercado existente, los distintos tamaños de firmas adoptan posiciones similares, con excepción de la auditoría de consorcio. Las diferencias de acceso a los recursos entre las diferentes firmas, sobre todo en capital humano, permiten entender esas posiciones que sostienen la concentración de la oferta.
Palabras clave:
- Reforma europea,
- estructura de mercado,
- firmas de auditoría,
- teoría de la dependencia de recursos
Appendices
Bibliography
- Ang, Nicole; Sidhu, Baljit K; Gallery, Natalie (2000). “The Incentives of Australian Public Companies Lobbying Against Proposed Superannuation Accounting Standards”, Abacus, Vol. 36, N° 1, p. 40-70.
- Arnett, Harold E.; Danos, Paul. (1979). CPA firm viability: A study of major environmental factors affecting firms of various sizes and characteristics, Ann Arbor: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Michigan.
- Barney, Jay B. (2001). “Resource-Based Theories of competitive Advantage: A Ten-year Retrospective on the Resource-based View”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27, N° 6, p. 643.
- Bills, Kenneth L.; Stephens, Nathaniel M. (2016). “Spatial Competition at the Intersection of the Large and Small Audit Firm Markets”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 35, N° 1, p. 23-45.
- Boone, Christophe; van Witteloostuijn, Arjen (1995). “Industrial Organization and Organizational Ecology: The Potentials for Cross-fertilization”, Organization Studies (Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG.), Vol. 16, N° 2, p. 265.
- Bröcheler, Vera; Maijoor, Steven; van Witteloostuijn, Arjen (2004). “Auditor Human Capital and Audit Firm Survival: The Dutch Audit Industry in 1930-1992”, Accounting, Organizations & Society, Vol. 29, N° 7, p. 627-646.
- Byington, J. Ralph; Sutton, Steve; Munter, Paul (1990). “A Professional Monopoly’s Response: Internal and External Threats to Self-Regulation”, Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance (Wiley), Vol. 1, N° 4, p. 307-316.
- Cabán-García, María T.; Cammack, Susan E. (2009). “Audit Firm Concentration and Competition: Effect of Consolidation Since 1997”, Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, Vol. 5, N° 1, p. 1-24.
- Carroll, Glenn R.; Dobrev, Stanislav D.; Swaminathan, Anand (2002). “Organizational Processes of Resource Partitioning”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24, p. 1-40.
- Carson, Elizabeth; Redmayne, Nives Botica; Liao, Lin (2014). “Audit Market Structure and Competition in Australia”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 24, N° 4, p. 298-312.
- Cassell, Cory A.; Giroux, Gary; Myers, Linda A.; Omer, Thomas C. (2013). “The Emergence of Second-Tier Auditors in the US: Evidence from Investor Perceptions of Financial Reporting Credibility”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 40, N° 3/4, p. 350-372.
- Chatham, Michael D.; Larson, Robert K.; Vietze, Axel (2010). “Issues Affecting the Development of an International Accounting Standard on Financial Instruments”, Advances in Accounting, Vol. 26, N° 1, p. 97-107.
- Colasse, Bernard; Standish, Peter (1998). “State versus Market: Contending Interests in the Struggle to Control French Accounting Standardisation”, Journal of Management & Governance, Vol. 2, N° 2, p. 107-147.
- Cox, James D. (2006). “The Oligopolistic Gatekeeper: The US Accounting Profession”, In J. Armour and J. A. McCahery (Eds), After Enron: Improving Corporate Law and Modernizing Securities Regulation in Europe and the US, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 269-316.
- Danos, Paul; Eichenseher, John W. (1982). “Audit Industry Dynamics: Factors Affecting Changes in Client-Industry Market Shares”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 20, N° 2, p. 604-616.
- Deegan, Craig; Morris, Richard; Stokes, Donald (1990). “Audit Firm Lobbying on Proposed Disclosure Requirements”, Australian Journal of Management (University of New South Wales), Vol. 15, N° 2, p. 261.
- Eshleman, John Daniel; Lawson, Bradley P. (2017). “Audit Market Structure and Audit Pricing”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 31, N° 1, p. 57-81.
- European Commission. (2010). Green Paper. Audit Policy: Lessons from the Crisis.
- Ferguson, Andrew; Stokes, Donald (2002). “Brand Name Audit Pricing, Industry Specialization, and Leadership Premiums Post-Big 8 and Big 6 Mergers”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19, N° 1, p. 77-110.
- Georgiou, George (2004). “Corporate Lobbying on Accounting Standards: Methods, Timing and Perceived Effectiveness”, Abacus, Vol. 40, N° 2, p. 219-237.
- Ghosh, Aloke; Lustgarten, Steven (2006). “Pricing of Initial Audit Engagements by Large and Small Audit Firms”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 23, N° 2, p. 333-368.
- Giner, Begoña; Arce, Miguel (2012). “Lobbying on Accounting Standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on Share-Based Payments”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 21, N° 4, p. 655-691.
- Hodder, Leslie D.; Hopkins, Patrick E. (2014). “Agency Problems, Accounting Slack, and Banks’ Response to Proposed Reporting of Loan Fair Values”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 39, N° 2, p. 117-133.
- Hoffmann, Sebastian; Zülch, Henning (2014). “Lobbying on Accounting Standard Setting in the Parliamentary Environment of Germany”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 25, N° 8, p. 709-723.
- Hogan, Chris E.; Martin, Roger D. (2009). “Risk Shifts in the Market for Audits: An Examination of Changes in Risk for “Second Tier” Audit Firms”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 28, N° 2, p. 93-118.
- Huber, Dennis (2015). “The Structure of the Public Accounting Industry. Why Existing Market Models Fail”, Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, Vol. 10, N° 2, p. 43-67.
- IFAC. (2009). Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, IFAC.
- Ivaldi, Marc; Jullien, Bruno; Rey, Patrick; Seabright, Paul; Tirole, Jean. (2003). The Economics of Tacit Collusion. Final Report for DG Competition, European Commission.
- Jorissen, A.; Lybaert, N.; Orens, R.; Van Der Tas, L. (2012). “Formal Participation in the IASB’s Due Process of Standard Setting: A Multi-Issue/Multi-Period Analysis”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 21, N° 4, p. 693-729.
- Königsgruber, Roland (2010). “A Political Economy of Accounting Standard Setting”, Journal of management and governance, Vol. 14, N° 4, p. 277-295.
- Le Manh, Anne (2012). “Une analyse du due process dans le cadre de la normalisation comptable: le cas du projet de comprehensive income par l’IASB/International Accounting Standardization Analyzed in Terms of a Political Process: The Specific Case of Petroleum Resources”, Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, Vol. 18, N° 1, p. 93-120.
- Le Vourc’h, J.; Morand, P. (2011). Study on the Effects of the Implementation of the “Acquis” on Statutory Audits of Annual and Consolidates Accounts Including the Consequences on the Audit Market, ESCP Europe.
- Levenstein, Margaret C.; Suslow, Valerie Y. (2006). “What Determines Cartel Success?”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 44, N° 1, p. 43-95.
- London Economics; Ewert, Ralf. (2006). Study on the Economic Impact of Auditors’ Liability Regimes (MARKT/2005/24/F). Final Report to EC-DG Internal Market and Services, European Commission.
- MacArthur, John B. (1988). “Some Implications of Auditor and Client Lobbying Activities: A Comparative Analysis”, Accounting & Business Research (Wolters Kluwer UK), Vol. 19, N° 73, p. 56-64.
- Maijoor, Steven; van Witteloostuijn, Arjen (1996). “An Empirical Test of the Resources-Based Theory: Strategic Regulation in the Dutch Audit Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, N° 7, p. 549-569.
- McKee, A. James; Williams, Paul F.; Frazier, Katherine Beal (1991). “A Case Study of Accounting Firm Lobbying: Advice or Consent”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 2, N° 3, p. 273-294.
- McLeay, Stuart; Ordelheide, Dieter; Young, Steven (2000). “Constituent Lobbying and its Impact on the Development of Financial Reporting Regulations: Evidence From Germany”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 25, N° 1, p. 79-98.
- Meier, Heidi Hylton; Alam, Pervaiz; Pearson, Michael A. (1993). “Auditor Lobbying for Accounting Standards: The Case of Banks and Savings and Loan Associations”, Accounting & Business Research (Wolters Kluwer UK), Vol. 23, N° 92, p. 477-487.
- Moizer, Peter (1992). “State of the Art in Audit Market Research”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 1, N° 2, p. 333-348.
- Niemi, Lasse (2004). “Auditor Size and Audit Pricing: Evidence from Small Audit Firms”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 13, N° 3, p. 541-560.
- Official Journal of the European Union. (2006). Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC.
- Official Journal of the European Union. (2014a). Directive 2014/56/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts.
- Official Journal of the European Union. (2014b). Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC.
- Orens, Raf; Jorissen, Ann; Lybaert, Nadine; Van Der Tas, Leo (2011). “Corporate Lobbying in Private Accounting Standard Setting: Does the IASB Have to Reckon with National Differences?”, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 8, N° 2, p. 211-234.
- Pennings, Johannes M.; Lee, Kyungmook; Van Witteloostuijn, Arjen (1998). “Human Capital, Social Capital, and Firm Dissolution”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, N° 4, p. 425-440.
- Peteraf, Margaret A. (1993). “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, N° 3, p. 179-191.
- Puro, Marsha (1984). “Audit Firm Lobbying Before the Financial Accounting Standards Board: An Empirical Study”, Journal of Accounting Research, p. 624-646.
- Saldaña, Johnny. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Simons, Dirk; Zein, Nicole (2016). “Audit Market Segmentation – The Impact of Mid-tier Firms on Competition”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 25, N° 1, p. 131-154.
- Standish, Peter (2003). “Evaluating National Capacity for Direct Participation in International Accounting Harmonization: France as a Test Case”, Abacus, Vol. 39, N° 2, p. 186-210.
- Steponavičiūtė, Jūratė; Zvirblis, Algis (2011). “Main Principles of the Complex Assessment of Audit Market Concentration and Audit Services Quality Levels”, Issues of Business & Law, Vol. 3, p. 20-33.
- Wang, Kun; O, Sewon; Iqbal, Zahid; Smith, L. Murphy (2011). “Auditor Market Share and Industry Specialization of Non-Big 4 Firms”, Journal of Accounting & Finance (2158-3625), Vol. 11, N° 2, p. 107-127.
- Wernerfelt, Birger (1984). “A Resource-Based View of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, N° 2, p. 171-180.