Abstracts
Abstract
When transmitting scientific knowledge, authors weave a web of intellectual affinities through the works they cite that portrays trends and developments in research in their discipline. In the present article, we aim to establish an intellectual panorama of Terminology in which we depict the outstanding developments in research and the most influential authors. To do so, we analyze periodical publications that have appeared over a wide period of time. Author Citation Analysis (ACA) and the visual representation of the relationships between authors through social networks (specifically, pathfinder networks) is based on the premise that links are necessarily established between the authors cited in any specific work so that greater frequency of co-ocurrence indicates a stronger affinity between authors. Among other findings, our results show that the group of most frequently cited authors represents less than 1% of the total and that only 12% of authors have published three or more articles. Moreover, we can confirm that research in Terminology is developing in three clearly differentiated directions: theoretical foundations, Natural Language Processing and Socioterminology.
Keywords/Mots-Clés:
- social network analysis,
- cocitation analysis,
- terminology,
- scientific production
Résumé
Lorsqu’ils transmettent des connaissances, les auteurs tissent souvent un réseau d’affinités intellectuelles par le biais des travaux qu’ils citent. Ce réseau offre un portrait des grands courants et de l’évolution de leur discipline. Le présent article a pour but de dresser un panorama du domaine de la terminologie en insistant sur ses développements et ses auteurs les plus influents. Pour ce faire, nous nous fondons sur les articles parus dans les périodiques du domaine, sur une période assez longue. L’analyse des citations et la représentation visuelle des relations entre les auteurs par le biais des réseaux sociaux postule que les citations établissent des liens entre les auteurs. Ainsi plus leur fréquence est élevée, plus les affinités entre ces auteurs seront fortes. Notre étude montre par ailleurs que le groupe des auteurs les plus cités représente moins de 1 % du nombre total et que seulement 12 % des auteurs ont publié trois articles ou plus. Enfin, cet article confirme que la terminologie, en tant que champ de recherche, se développe selon trois orientations bien distinctes : les fondements théoriques, le traitement des langues naturelles et la socioterminologie.
Appendices
References
- Batagelj, V. and A. Mrvar (1996): “Networks/Pajek. Program for large network analysis”, Página web, [consulta 14 2003], http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek.
- Braam, R. R, Moed, H. F, and A. F. J. van Raan(1991): “Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, I: structural aspects and II: dynamical aspects”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, pp. 233-266.
- Castro-Prieto, M. R. (2007): Análisis de la terminología a través de la producción científica. Estudio experimental de la disciplina, Tesis doctoral, Dirigida por Pamela Faber Benítez, María Dolores Olvera Lobo, Granada, Universidad de Granada, http://adrastea.ugr.es/search*spi~S4/.
- Castro-Prieto, M. R. y M. D. Olvera-Lobo (2003a): “Aproximación a la disciplina terminológica a través de las revistas especializadas”, I Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Ibérica de Estudios de Traducción e Interpretación (AIETI), pp. 515-524.
- Castro-Prieto, M. R. y M.D. Olvera-Lobo (2003b): “Producción científica de la terminología: aproximación mediante el análisis de citas de las revistas especializadas”, en Terminología y traducción: un bosquejo de su evolución, pp. 159-170.
- Chen, C. (1999): “Visualizing semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries”, Information Processing and Management 35-2, pp. 401-420.
- Chen, C., Paul, R. J. and B. O’Keefe (2001): “Fitting the jigsaw of citation: Information visualization in domain Analysis”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52-4, pp. 315-330.
- Ding, Y. G., Chodbury, G. and S. Foo (2001): “Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis”. Information Processing and Management 37, pp. 817-842 [consulta 22 2001], http://dois.mimas.ac.uk/DoIS/data/Articles/juljuljiqy:2001:v:37:i:6:p:817-842.html.
- Eom, S. B. (1996): “Mapping the intellectual structure of research in decision support systems through author co-citation analysis”, Decision Support Systems, 16, pp. 315-318.
- Freeman, L. C. (2000): “La centralidad en las redes sociales. Clarificación conceptual”, Política y Sociedad. Monográfico “Análisis de Redes Sociales: La Consolidación de un Paradigma Interdisciplinar”, 33, pp. 131-148.
- Garfield, E. (1994): “The concept of Citation Indexing: A unique and innovative tool for navigating the research literature”, Currents Contents, 3, pp. 3-5.
- González de Dios, Moya, J. M. y M. A. Mateos (1997): “Indicadores bibliométricos: características y limitaciones en el análisis de la actividad científica”, Anales Españoles de Pediatría, 47-3, pp. 235-244.
- Leydersdorff, L. (1998): “Theories of citation?”, Scientometrics, 43-1, pp. 5-25.
- Marshakova, V. (1973): “System of document connections based on references”, Nauchno-Tekhnichescaya Informatisya: Series II 6, pp. 3-8.
- McCain, K. W. (1990): “Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41-6, pp. 433-443.
- Small, H. (1973): “Co-citation in scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between publications”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24-4, pp. 265-269.
- Small, H.(1997): “Update on science mapping: creating large document spaces”, Scientometrics, 38-2, pp. 275-293.
- Small, H. (1998): “A general framework for creating large scale maps of science in two or three dimensions: the SciViz system”. Scientometrics, 41-1/2, pp. 125-133.
- Small, H. and B. C. Griffith (1974): “The structure of scientific literatures. I: identifying and graphing specialities”, Science Studies 4, pp. 17-40.
- Small, H., Sweeney, E. and E. Greenlee (1985): “Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science”, Scientometrics, 8-5/6, pp. 321-340.
- Solla Price, D. J. (1963): Little Science, Big Science, New York, Columbia University Press.
- Wasserman, S. y K. Faust (1994): Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press.
- White, H. D. (1986): “Cocited author retrieval”, Information Technology and Libraries, 5-2, pp. 93-99.
- White, H. D. and B.C. Griffith (1981): “Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, pp. 163-172.
- White, H. D. and B.C. Griffith (1982): “Authors as markers of intellectual space: co-citation in studies of science, technology and society”, Journal of Documentation, 38, pp. 255-272.
- White, H. D. and K.W. McCain (1998): “Visualizing a Discipline: An author Co-citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49-4, pp. 327-355.