Abstracts
Résumé
L’article présente une rapid review de la littérature anglophone et francophone sur le travail collectif des enseignants pour l’évaluation des apprentissages. Ce genre de travail collectif tend à devenir une norme dans les systèmes éducatifs, soulevant des enjeux majeurs dans le champ de l’évaluation en éducation. La littérature compte déjà des synthèses et des recherches empiriques qui traitent de la collaboration des enseignants de manière générale, mais aucune ne traite spécifiquement des pratiques évaluatives collectives. Cette recherche documentaire dans la littérature conduit à la sélection de 30 articles, aux niveaux primaire et secondaire. L’analyse de ces articles permet 1) d’identifier les dynamiques mises en place dans les établissements et 2) d’observer les conséquences pour tous les acteurs de l’école. Les résultats permettent de discuter de certaines tensions liées à cette tendance, au point de vue des politiques de pilotage mais également sur le plan des pratiques évaluatives individuelles et collectives.
Mots-clés :
- enseignants,
- évaluation des apprentissages,
- revue de littérature,
- travail collectif
Abstract
This paper presents a rapid review of the Anglophone and Francophone literature on collaboration among teachers to assess learning. This kind of collective work tends to become a norm in education systems, raising major issues in the field of educational assessment. The literature already contains summaries of empirical research dealing with teacher collaboration in general, but none dealing specifically with collective assessment practices. A systematic literature search led to the selection of 30 articles, in primary and secondary education. Analysis of these articles allows us to 1) identify the dynamics at work in the schools and 2) observe the consequences for all those involved in the school. The results allow us to discuss certain tensions linked to this trend, from the point of view of steering policies, but also about individual and collective evaluation practices.
Keywords:
- assessment,
- collaboration,
- review of literature,
- teachers
Resumo
O artigo apresenta uma rapid review da literatura anglófona e francófona sobre o trabalho coletivo dos professores para a avaliação das aprendizagens. Este tipo de trabalho coletivo tende a tornar-se uma norma nos sistemas educativos, levantando questões importantes no campo da avaliação em educação. A literatura já inclui sínteses e investigações empíricas que abordam a colaboração entre professores de forma geral, mas nenhuma trata especificamente das práticas avaliativas coletivas. Esta investigação documental na literatura resulta na seleção de 30 artigos, nos níveis primário e secundário. A análise destes artigos permite 1) identificar as dinâmicas implementadas nas instituições e 2) observar as consequências para todos os atores da escola. Os resultados possibilitam discutir algumas tensões associadas a esta tendência, tanto do ponto de vista das políticas de gestão como no que respeita às práticas avaliativas individuais e coletivas.
Palavras chaves:
- professores,
- avaliação das aprendizagens,
- revisão de literatura,
- trabalho coletivo
Appendices
Liste de références
- Adie, L. (2013). The development of teacher assessment identity through participation in online moderation. Dans V. Klenowski (dir.), International Teacher Judgement Practices (p. 101-116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.650150
- Adie, L. (2014). The development of shared understandings of assessment policy: Travelling between global and local contexts. Journal of Education Policy, 24(4), 532-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.853101
- Adie, L. E., Klenowski, V. & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). Towards an understanding of teacher judgement in the context of social moderation. Educational Review, 64(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.598919
- Allal, L. & Mottier Lopez, L. (2008). Mieux comprendre le jugement professionnel en évaluation : apports et implications de l’étude genevoise. Dans L. Lafortune & L. Allal (dir.), Jugement professionnel en évaluation : pratiques enseignantes au Québec et à Genève (p. 223- 239). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Allal, L. & Mottier Lopez, L. (2009). Au coeur du jugement professionnel en évaluation : des démarches de triangulation. Les dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, 22(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.3406/dsedu.2009.1164
- Allal, L. & Mottier Lopez, L. (2014). Teachers’ professional judgment in the context of collaborative assessment practice. Dans C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski & P. Colbert (dir.), Designing assessment for quality learning (p. 151-165). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2_10
- Allenbach, M. (2016). Négociation de pratiques collaboratives et construction du rôle des intervenant-es à l’école [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Fribourg].
- Ardoino, J. & Berger, G. (1990). Étude critique - Vers une nouvelle conception de l’évaluation ? Revue française de pédagogie, (90), 105-112. https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfp_0556-7807_1990_num_90_1_2466_t1_0105_0000_1
- Barrère, A., Saujat, F. & Lantheaume, F. (2008). Rendre visible le travail enseignant. Questions de méthodes : Entretien de Anne Barrère et Frédéric Saujat par Françoise Lantheaume. Recherche et formation, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/rechercheformation.861
- Beuret, J. E. (2010). De la négociation conflictuelle à la négociation concertative : un « Point de Passage Transactionnel ». Négociations, (1), 43-60. https://www.cairn.info/revue-negociations-2010-1-page-43.htm
- Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B. & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning ? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.557020
- Borgès, C. & Lessard, C. (2007). Qu’arrive-t-il quand la collaboration enseignante devient une norme ? Dans J.-F. Marcel (dir), Coordonner, collaborer, coopérer : de nouvelles pratiques enseignantes (p. 61-74). De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.marce.2007.01.0061
- Buckley, K. & Lipscombe, K. (2022). Validity and the design of classroom assessment in 77478/teacher teams. The Australian Educational Researcher, 49(2), 425-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00437-9
- Cohen, S. G. & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063970230
- Colbert, P., Wyatt-Smith, C. & Klenowski, V. (2012). A systems-level approach to building sustainable assessment cultures: Moderation, quality task design and dependability of judgement. Policy Futures in Education, 10(4), 386-401. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.386
- Connolly, S., Klenowski, V. & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2012). Moderation and consistency of teacher judgement: teachers’ views. British Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.569006
- Crisp, V. (2017). The judgement processes involved in the moderation of teacher-assessed projects. Oxford Review of Education, 43(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1232245
- Dachet, D. (2024). Umbrella Review : de sa méthodologie aux considérations méthodologiques relatives à son application dans le champ des sciences de l’Éducation [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Liège].
- Decuyper, S., Dochy, F. & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organizations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002
- De Ketele, J.-M. (2006). La recherche en évaluation : propos synthétiques et prospectifs. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 29(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.7202/1086970ar
- De Ketele, J.-M. & Gérard, F.-M. (2005). La validation des épreuves d’évaluation selon l’approche par les compétences. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 28(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.7202/1087028ar
- DeLuca, C., Lapointe-McEwan, D. & Luhanga, U. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9233-6
- Doppenberg, J. J., Den Brok, P. J. & Bakx, A. W. E. A. (2012). Collaborative teacher learning across foci of collaboration: Perceived activities and outcomes. Teachers and Teacher Education, 28, 899–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.04.007
- Dumez, H. (2011). Faire une revue de littérature : pourquoi et comment ? Le libellio d’aegis, 7(2), 15-27. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00657381
- Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R. K., Swanson, R., de León, V., Morrison, D. & Heredia, S. C. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: Findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44, 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3
- Germier, C. & Marcel, J. F. (2016). La négociation des accords. Approche ethnographique des pratiques de deux collectifs d’enseignants. Les dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, (35), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.4000/dse.1271
- Gilbert, A.-F. (2018). Le travail collectif enseignant, entre informel et institué. Dossier de veille de l’IFÉ, n° 124.
- Gipps, C. (1994, 4-8 avril). Quality assurance in teachers’ assessment [Présentation]. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New-Orleans, USA.
- Grangeat, M. (2011). Le travail collectif enseignant : éléments de modélisation du développement professionnel. Dans M. Grangeat (dir.), Les démarches d’investigation dans l’enseignement scientifique. Pratiques de classe, travail collectif enseignant, acquisitions des élèves (p. 79-106). École Normale Supérieure. https://shs.hal.science./halshs-01205850
- Grant, L. (2012). Cross-sector moderation as a means of engaging staff with assessment and teaching pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 10(4), 434-446. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.434
- Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. OISE Press.
- Hargreaves, A. (2021). Teacher collaboration: 30 years of research on its nature, forms, limitations and effects. Teachers and Teaching, 25(5), 603-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1639499
- Hargreaves, E. (2007). The validity of collaborative assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 14(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478594
- Hargreaves, E. (2012). Assessment for learning and teacher learning communities: UK teachers’ experiences. Teaching Education, 24(3), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.713931
- Hargreaves, E., Berry, R., Lai, Y. C., Leung, P., Scott, D. & Stobart, G. (2013). Teachers’ experiences of autonomy in continuing professional development: Teacher learning communities in London and Hong Kong. Teacher development, 17(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.748686
- Hattie, J. (2017). L’apprentissage visible pour les enseignants. Connaître son impact pour maximiser le rendement des élèves. PUQ.
- Heredia, S. C., Furtak, E. M., Morrison, D. & Renga, I. P. (2016). Science teachers’ representations of classroom practice in the process of formative assessment design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(7), 697-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9482-3
- Hermansen, H. (2014). Recontextualising assessment resources for use in local settings: Opening up the black box of teachers’ knowledge work. Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 470-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.956771
- Hermansen, H. & Nerland, M. (2014). Reworking practice through an AfL project: An analysis of teachers’ collaborative engagement with new assessment guidelines. British educational research journal, 40(1), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3037
- Hipkins, R. & Robertson, S. (2012). The complexities of moderating student writing in a community of practice. Assessment Matters, 4, 30-52. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0099
- Holmeier, M., Maag Merki, K. & Hirt, C. (2017). Gemeinsames Prüfen. Eine Fallanalyse in Gymnasien in der Schweiz. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17060-8
- Klenowski, V., Adie, L., Gunn, S., Looney, A., Elwood, J., Wyatt-Smith, C. & Colbert, P. (2007, 25-29 novembre). Moderation as judgement practice: Reconciling system level accountability and local level practice. Dans P.-L. Jeffery (chair), Conference: Research impacts: Proving or improving ? [Conférence]. Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Australia.
- Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
- Laveault, D. & Yerly, G. (2017). Modération statistique et modération sociale des résultats scolaires : approches opposées ou complémentaires ? Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 40(2), 91–123. https://doi.org/10.7202/1043569ar
- Letor, C. (2010). Moments de coopération entre enseignants : entre logiques institutionnelles, organisationnelles et professionnelles. Travail et formation en éducation, 7, 107-120. http://journals.openedition.org/tfe/1458
- Linn, R. L. (1993). Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0601_5
- Marcel, J.-F, Dupriez, V., Perisset Bagnoud, D. & Tardif, M. (2007). Coordonner, collaborer, coopérer : de nouvelles pratiques enseignantes. De Boeck.
- Maroy, C. (2005). Vers une régulation post-bureaucratique des systèmes d’enseignement en Europe ? Cahiers de la recherche en Education et Formation, (49). http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/81045
- Maroy, C. & Voisin, A. (2014). Une typologie des politiques d’accountability en éducation : l’incidence de l’instrumentation et des théories de la régulation. Éducation comparée. Revue de recherche internationale et comparative en éducation, 11, 31-58. https://doi.org/1866/14074
- Matre, S. & Solheim, R. (2016). Opening dialogic spaces: Teachers’ metatalk on writing assessment. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 188-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.001
- Maxwell, G. S. (2001). Moderation of assessments in vocational education and training. Queensland Government Departement of Employment and Training.
- McFadden, J., Jung, K., Robinson, B. & Tretter, T. R. (2022). Teacher-developed Multi-Dimensional Science Assessments Supporting Elementary Teacher Learning about the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(1), 55-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1905331
- McLaughlin, M. W. & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. University of Chicago Press.
- Meirieu, P. (2023). Du bon usage de l’autonomie des établissements scolaires. Administration et Éducation, 1, 127-141. https://doi.org/10.3917/admed.177.0127
- Mertler, C. A. (2004). Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference ? American secondary education, 33(1) 49-64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41064623
- Morales Villabona, F. & Mottier Lopez, L. (2016). Quelle évaluation collaborative dans la modération sociale entre enseignants ? Dans. Mottier Lopez & W. Tessaro (dir.), Le jugement professionnel, au coeur de l’évaluation et de la régulation des apprentissages (p. 289-312). Peter Lang.
- Mottier Lopez, L. (2008). Apprentissage situé : la microculture de classe en mathématiques. Peter Lang.
- Mottier Lopez, L. (2013). De la mesure à l’évaluation collaborative en éducation. Revue française d’administration publique, 148(4), 939-952. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.148.0939
- Mottier Lopez, L. (2021). Une évaluation continue pour apprendre durablement, une évaluation à visée inclusive. Revue suisse de pédagogie spécialisée, 11(4), 9-16. https://ojs.szh.ch/revue/article/view/168
- Mottier Lopez, L. & Allal, L. (2008). Le jugement professionnel en évaluation : un acte cognitif et une pratique sociale située. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Bildungswissenschaften, 30(3), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:4229
- Mottier Lopez, L. & Pasquini, R. (2017). Professional controversies between teachers about their summative assessment practices: A tool for building assessment capacity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 228-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1293001
- Mottier Lopez, L., Tessaro, W., Dechamboux, L. & Villabona, F.- M. (2012). La modération sociale : un dispositif soutenant l’émergence de savoirs négociés sur l’évaluation certificative des apprentissages des élèves. Questions vives : Recherches en éducation, 6(18), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsvives.1235
- Nilsberth, M. & Sandlund, E. (2021). On the interactional challenges of revealing summative assessments: Collaborative scoring talk among teachers and students in Swedish national tests. Linguistics and education, 61(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100899
- Page M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffman, T. C. & Mulrow, C. D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic review. British Medical Journal, 372(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Reid, L. (2007). Teachers talking about writing assessment: valuable professional learning ? Improving Schools, 10(2), 132-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207077843
- Salas, E., Burke, S. C. & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). Teamwork: Emerging principles. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00046
- Smail, E. (2020). Using involvement in moderation to strengthen teachers’ assessment for learning capability. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(5), 522-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1777087
- Spillane, J. P., Shirrell, M. & Hopkins, M. (2016). Designing and deploying a professional learning community (PLC) organizational routine: Bureaucratic and collegial arrangements in tandem. Les dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, 35, 97-122. https://doi.org/10.4000/dse.1283
- Stewart, T. A. & Houchens, G. W. (2014). Deep impact: How a job-embedded formative assessment professional development model affected teacher practice. Qualitative Research in Education, 3(1), 51-82. https://doi.org/10.4471/qre.2014.36
- Strauss, A. (1992). La trame de la négociation. L’Harmattan.
- Van der Schaaf, M., Baartman, L. & Prins, F. (2012). Exploring the role of assessment criteria during teachers’ collaborative judgement processes of students’ portfolios. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(7), 847-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.576312
- Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E. & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational research review, 15, 17-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
- Wenger, E. (2005). La théorie des communautés de pratique. Presses de l’Université Laval.
- Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V. & Gunn, S. (2010). The centrality of teachers’ judgement practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, policy & practice, 17(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903565610
- Yerly, G. (2021). La collaboration des enseignants autour de l’évaluation des apprentissages comme moyen de piloter le système ? Le cas de la politique « évaluation commune » dans le secondaire supérieur en Suisse. Les dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, 44, 77-97. https://doi.org/10.4000/dse.5322