Abstracts
Abstract
Despite the growing number of studies on the psychological health of doctoral students, interest seems to be focused on their psychological distress. This may be due to the lack of available tools contextualized to doctoral work to measure both psychological distress and well-being, which represent two indissociable aspects of psychological health. Since such a tool appears essential for future empirical research that will attempt, for example, to clarify the predictors and consequences of this construct, the present study aimed to adapt an existing work- related psychological health scale (Gilbert et al., 2011) into a short, doctoral- contextualized version, and to examine its psychometric qualities. Four indicators of construct validity (exploratory, confirmatory, convergent, and predictive) and two indicators of reliability (internal consistency and temporal stability) were examined among two samples including 380 and 377 doctoral students, respectively. A short unidimensional scale comprising eight items (four items measuring the distress pole and four items measuring the well-being pole) with good psychometric qualities was obtained, supporting its use in future studies.
Keywords:
- doctorate,
- psychological distress,
- psychological health,
- psychological well-being,
- scale development,
- scale validation
Résumé
Malgré le nombre grandissant d’études sur la santé psychologique des doctorants, l’intérêt semble surtout axé sur leur détresse psychologique. Ceci peut s’expliquer par le manque d’outils contextualisés au travail doctoral pour mesurer à la fois la détresse et le bien-être psychologiques, deux aspects indissociables de la santé psychologique. Or, un tel outil apparaît essentiel pour les futures recherches empiriques qui tenteront, par exemple, d’éclairer les prédicteurs et les conséquences de ce construit. La présente étude visait donc à adapter une échelle existante de santé psychologique au travail (Gilbert et al., 2011) en version courte et contextualisée au doctorat et à examiner ses qualités psychométriques. Quatre indicateurs de la validité de construit (exploratoire, confirmatoire, convergente et prédictive) et deux indicateurs de fidélité (cohérence interne et stabilité temporelle) ont été examinés sur deux échantillons de 380 et 377 doctorants. Une courte échelle unidimensionnelle à huit items (quatre items mesurant le pôle de la détresse et quatre items mesurant le pôle du bien-être) présentant de bonnes qualités psychométriques a été obtenue, justifiant son utilisation dans des études ultérieures.
Mots-clés :
- bien-être psychologique,
- détresse psychologique,
- développement d’outil,
- doctorat,
- santé psychologique,
- validation d’outil
Resumo
Apesar do crescente número de estudos sobre a saúde psicológica de doutorandos, o interesse parece estar centrado principalmente no seu sofrimento psicológico. Isto é devido provavelmente à falta de ferramentas disponíveis adaptadas ao trabalho doutoral para medir simultaneamente o sofrimento e o bem-estar psicológicos, que representam dois aspectos indissociáveis da saúde psicológica. No entanto, tal ferramenta parece essencial para futuros estudos empíricos que poderão, por exemplo, esclarecer os preditores e as consequências deste constructo. O presente estudo teve, portanto, como objetivo adaptar uma escala de saúde psicológica no trabalho (Gilbert et al., 2011) em versão curta e adequada ao doutoramento e examinar suas qualidades psicométricas. Quatro indicadores de validade do construto (exploratório, confirmatório, convergente e preditivo) e dois indicadores de confiabilidade (coerência interna e estabilidade temporal) foram examinados em duas amostras, incluindo 380 e 377 alunos de doutoramento, respectivamente. Obteve-se uma pequena escala unidimensional oito itens (quatro itens que medem o polo de sofrimento e quatro itens que medem o polo de bem-estar) com boas qualidades psicométricas, justificando a sua utilização em estudos posteriores.
Palavras chaves:
- bem-estar psicológico,
- desenvolvimento de ferramenta,
- doutoramento,
- saúde psicológica,
- sofrimento psicológico,
- validação de ferramenta
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
References
- Achim, A. (2020). Esprit et enjeux de l’analyse factorielle exploratoire. The quantitative methods for psychology, 16(4), 213-247. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p213
- Alwin, D. F., Baumgartner, E. M., & Beattie, B. A. (2018). Number of response categories and reliability in attitude measurement. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 6(2), 212-239. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx025
- American Psychiatric Association. (2015). DSM-5-Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux. Elsevier Masson.
- Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. American journal of preventive medicine, 10(2), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30622-6
- Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 468-483.
- Boisselier, J., Lemée, C., Flores, P., & Wagner, V. (2022). Vulnérabilité sociale et santé mentale: quand les doctorants sont mis à mal. Nouvelle revue de psychosociologie, 33(1), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.3917/nrp.033.0167
- Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The Revised Neo Personality Inventory (neo-pi-r). Sage Publications.
- Cotterall, S. (2013). More than just a brain: Emotions and the doctoral experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 174-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.680017
- Cristia, C. (2022). Le processus doctoral : entre souffrances et vulnérabilités. Essais. Revue interdisciplinaire d’Humanités, (Hors-série 7).
- Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & Savoie, A. (2012). What is Psychological Well-Being, Really? A Grassroots Approach from the Organizational Sciences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(4), 659-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9285-3
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of happiness studies, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1
- DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
- Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
- Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well- being. Psychological inquiry, 9(1), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0901_3
- Dodd, A. L., Priestley, M., Tyrrell, K., Cygan, S., Newell, C., & Byrom, N. C. (2021). University student well-being in the United Kingdom: a scoping review of its conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Mental Health, 30(3), 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1875419
- Enzor, J. (2017). Friendship, mental health, and doctoral education: A generic qualitative thematic analysis [Thèse de doctorat, Capella University].
- Falissard, B. (2006). The unidimensionality of a psychiatric scale: A statistical point of view. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 8(3), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.66
- Gilbert, M. H., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & Savoie, A. (2011). Validation d’une mesure de santé psychologique au travail. European review of applied psychology, 61(4), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2011.09.001
- Giudicelli, E., Syssau, A., & Blanc, N. (2022). Quelles pistes pour un vécu positif du doctorat? Apports de la littérature scientifique actuelle. Psychologie Française. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2022.06.003
- González-Betancor, S. M., & Dorta-González, P. (2020). Risk of Interruption of Doctoral Studies and Mental Health in PhD Students. Mathematics, 8(10), 1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101695
- Haider, Z., & Dasti, R. (2022). Mentoring, research self-efficacy, work–life balance and psychological well-being of doctoral program students. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 11(2), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-07-2020-0036
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8e éd.). Prentice-Hall.
- Hargreaves, C. E., De Wilde, J. P., Juniper, B., & Walsh, E. (2017). Re-evaluating doctoral researchers’ well-being: What has changed in five years. As of, 10. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/study/graduate-school/public/well-being/Wellbeing-for-GS.pdf
- Haynes, C., Bulosan, M., Citty, J., Grant-Harris, M., Hudson, J., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2012). My world is not my doctoral program… or is it?: Female students’ perceptions of well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 1-17.
- Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
- Hazell, C. M., Chapman, L., Valeix, S. F., Roberts, P., Niven, J. E., & Berry, C. (2020). Understanding the mental health of doctoral researchers: a mixed methods systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Systematic reviews, 9(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01443-1
- Juniper, B., Walsh, E., Richardson, A., & Morley, B. (2012). A new approach to evaluating the well-being of PhD research students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 563-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.555816
- Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197
- Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
- Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(4), 868–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
- Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour research and therapy, 33(3), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U
- Marais, G. A., Shankland, R., Haag, P., Fiault, R., & Juniper, B. (2018). A survey and psychology intervention on French PhD student well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 109-138. https://doi.org/10.28945/3948
- Massé, R., Poulin, C., Dassa, C., Lambert, J., Bélair, S., & Battaglini, A. (1998). The structure of mental health: Higher-order confirmatory factor analyses of psychological distress and well-being measures. Social indicators research, 45(1), 475-504. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006992032387
- O’Brien, N., Lawlor, M., Chambers, F., & O’Brien, W. (2020). State of mind ireland- higher education: a mixed-methods longitudinal evaluation of a positive mental health intervention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5530. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155530
- Organisation mondiale de la santé. (2022, June 17). La santé mentale : renforcer notre action. Organisation mondiale de la santé. https://www.who.int/fr/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response
- Préville, M., Potvin, L., & Boyer, R. (1995). The structure of psychological distress.Psychological Reports, 77(1), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.1.275
- Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
- Rogers, C. R. (1963). Actualizing tendency in relation to “Motives” and to consciousness. Dans M. R. Jones (dir.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (p. 1–24). University of Nebraska Press.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
- Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current directions in psychological science, 4(4), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395
- Scott, H., & Takarangi, M. K. (2019). Measuring PhD Student’s Psychological Well- being: Are we seeing the whole picture?. Student Success, 10(3), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i3.1294
- Seelert, K. R., Hill, R. D., Rigdon, M. A., & Schwenzfeier, E. (1999). Measuring patient distress in primary care. Family Medecine, 31(7), 483-487.
- Staines, G. L. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and nonwork. Human relations, 33(2), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267800330020
- Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., & McAlpine, L. (2020). PhD imposter syndrome: Exploring antecedents, consequences, and implications for doctoral well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 15, 737-758. https://doi.org/10.28945/4670
- Talip, D. S. N. A., Hassan, Z., Kasa, M., Sabil, S., & Ibrahim, D. K. A. (2021). The relationship of work life balance and the quality of life among employees studying part time. International Journal of Academic Research, 11(14), 270-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i14/8573
- Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of life Outcomes, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
- Veit, C. T., & Ware, J. E. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 51(5), 730-742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.5.730
- Vekkaila, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2014). Engaging and disengaging doctoral experiences in the behavioural sciences. International Journal for Researcher Development, 5(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRD-09-2013-0015
- Vincent, C., Tremblay-Wragg, É., Déri, C. E., & Mathieu-Chartier, S (2022). A Multi-Phase Mixed-Method Study Defining Dissertation Writing Enjoyment and Comparing PhD Students Writing in the Company of Others to Those Writing Alone. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(4), 1016-1031. http://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2120854
- Wiens, K., Bhattarai, A., Dores, A., Pedram, P., Williams, J. V., Bulloch, A. G., & Patten, S. B. (2020). Mental health among Canadian postsecondary students: a mental health crisis? The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 65(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743719874178