Abstracts
Résumé
Quand plusieurs études par comparaison de groupes (intervention et témoin) portent sur une même intervention en milieu scolaire, la synthèse de leurs résultats permet d’évaluer l’effet de cette intervention et de répondre aux attentes des praticiens, mais aussi d’orienter les recherches futures. C’est dans ce but que sont réalisées des synthèses quantitatives ou encore des méta-analyses. Pour chacune des études sélectionnées, une taille d’effet est calculée, qui est le g de Hedges (différence standardisée des moyennes des deux groupes) quand la variable à expliquer est un score post-test. La taille d’effet globale est alors estimée en suivant dans la plupart des cas le modèle des effets aléatoires. Enfin, pour conclure quant à l’intérêt de l’intervention, les tailles d’effet sont traduites en nombre de mois de progrès. Un exemple numérique est proposé pour faciliter la compréhension des modèles analytiques mis en oeuvre dans une méta-analyse pour les cas les plus simples.
Mots-clés :
- effet fixe,
- effets aléatoires,
- évaluation,
- intervention,
- méta-analyse,
- taille d’effet
Abstract
When several comparison group studies relate to the same intervention in the school environment, the synthesis of their results makes it possible to evaluate the effect of this intervention and to meet the expectations of practitioners, but also to guide the future research. It is for this purpose that quantitative summaries or meta-analyses are carried out. For each of the selected studies, an effect size is calculated; when the variable to be explained is a posttest score, we use Hedges’ g (standardized difference of the means of the two groups). The overall effect size is then estimated by following in most cases the random effects model. Finally, to determine the interest of the intervention, the results of the meta-analysis are interpreted according to several grids. A worked example is provided to help the understanding of the analytical models implemented in a meta-analysis in simple cases.
Keywords:
- effect size,
- evaluation,
- fixed effect,
- intervention,
- meta-analysis,
- random effects
Resumo
Quando vários estudos por comparação de grupos (intervenção e controlo) se referem à mesma intervenção em ambiente escolar, a síntese dos seus resultados permite avaliar o efeito desta intervenção e ir ao encontro das expectativas dos práticos, mas também orientar futuras investigações. É para esse fim que são realizados resumos quantitativos ou meta-análises. Para cada um dos estudos selecionados é calculado um tamanho de efeito, que é o g de Hedges (diferença padronizada entre as médias dos dois grupos) quando a variável a ser explicada é uma pontuação pós-teste. O tamanho do efeito global é então estimado seguindo, na maioria dos casos, o modelo de efeitos aleatórios. Finalmente, para concluir sobre o interesse da intervenção, os tamanhos dos efeitos são traduzidos no número de meses de progresso. Um exemplo numérico é proposto para facilitar a compreensão dos modelos analíticos implementados numa meta-análise para os casos mais simples.
Palavras chaves:
- avaliação,
- efeito fixo,
- efeitos aleatórios,
- intervenção,
- meta-análise,
- tamanho do efeito
Appendices
Liste de références
- Berlin, J., & Golub, R. (2014). Meta-analysis as Evidence. Building a Better Pyramid. JAMA, 312(6), 603-605. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.8167
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley.
- Chalmers, I. (2015). Commentary for history special issue of Research Synthesis Method. Research Synthesis Method, 6(3), 268-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1144
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
- Cooper, H., Hedges, L., & Valentine, J. (2019). The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
- Dietrichson, J., Filges, T., Seerup, J. K., Klokker, R. H., Viinholt, B. C. A., Bøg, M., & Eiberg, M. (2012). Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K - 6: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, e1152. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1152
- EEF (n.d.). Impact evaluation report template. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/projects-and-evaluation/evaluation/evaluation-guidance-and-resources/reporting-templates
- EEF. (2022). Statistical analysis guidance for EEF evaluations. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/projects-and-evaluation/evaluation/evaluation-guidance-and-resources/evaluation-design
- EEF. (2023). Teaching and learning. Early years toolkit guide https://d2tic4wvo1iusb.cloudfront.net/documents/toolkit/Toolkit_guide_v1.2_-_2023.pdf?v=1677829895
- Glass, G. (1976). Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
- Glass, G., & Smith, M. L. (1977). Meta-Analysis of Psychotherapy Outcome Studies. American Psychologist, 32(9), 752–760. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.32.9.752
- Hedges, L. (1981). Distribution Theory for Glass’s Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164588
- Hedges, L., & Schauer, J. (2018). Randomised trials in education in the USA. Educational Research, 60(3), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1493350
- Hedges, L., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Method, 1(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
- Pigott, T., & Polanin, J. (2020). Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24 –46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
- Roques, N. (2022a). Aider les élèves en mathématiques dès l’école primaire. Guide des pratiques du What Works Clearinghouse. L’Harmattan.
- Roques, N. (2022b). La régression linéaire multiple dans les études par comparaison de groupes en milieu scolaire. https://www.mathadoc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Regression-lineaire-multiple-et-sciences-de-leducation.pdf
- Roques, N. (à paraitre). Les essais contrôlés randomisés au Royaume-Uni : évaluer les interventions efficaces pour favoriser l’apprentissage des mathématiques. Éducation & Didactique.
- Slavin, R., Lake, C., & Groff C. (2009). Effective programs in Middle and High School Mathematics: a best-evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 839-911. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308330968
- Tipton, E., Pustejovsky, J., & Ahmadi, H. (2018). A history of meta-regression: Technical, conceptual, and practical developments between 1974 and 2018. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(2), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1338
- WWC. (2022). WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook 5.0.https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/Final_WWC-HandbookVer5_0-0-508.pdf