Abstracts
Résumé
L’habileté à communiquer oralement est importante en sciences, mais peu d’outils évaluent les perceptions et l’attitude d’étudiants de programmes scientifiques envers la communication orale en sciences. Cette recherche propose la création, d’une part, d’un modèle théorique de la communication orale en sciences et, d’autre part, d’un questionnaire conforme à ce modèle intitulé Perceptions et attitude envers la communication orale en sciences (PACOS) pour des étudiants du postsecondaire. Un échantillon total de 1295 étudiants collégiaux québécois en sciences de la nature a participé à cette recherche en répondant aux trois versions successives du questionnaire PACOS tout au long de son élaboration. Cinq facteurs ont été identifiés par des analyses en composantes principales (ACP) et par une analyse factorielle confirmatoire (AFC), soit le plaisir, l’anxiété, la perception de la pertinence ainsi que deux aspects du sentiment d’efficacité personnelle lors d’une communication orale en sciences (SEPCOS) qui ont émergé lors de l’élaboration du questionnaire : le SEPCOS « normes et contenu », qui porte sur l’efficacité à bien s’exprimer oralement, et le SEPCOS « sens du spectacle », qui décrit plutôt la façon d’être et de capter l’attention du public. L’évaluation globale du PACOS montre que ce questionnaire a de bonnes qualités psychométriques et que les facteurs obtenus lors du processus de validation soutiennent le modèle théorique.
Mots-clés :
- perceptions,
- attitude,
- sentiment d’efficacité personnelle,
- communication orale en sciences
Abstract
The ability to communicate orally is important in science, but few tools assess students’ perceptions and attitude toward scientific oral communication in scientific programs. This research developed the Perceptions and Attitude toward Scientific Oral Communication (PACOS) questionnaire for post-secondary students with the theoretical model associated. A sample of 1295 Quebec college students in the natural sciences program participated in this research, responding to the three versions of the questionnaire during the stages of its development. Principal component analyses (PCA) followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) allowed to identify five factors for the perceptions and attitude toward scientific oral communication questionnaire: pleasure, anxiety, perceived relevance, and two aspects of self-efficacy (S-EOCS), namely the S-EOCS “Norms & Content”, which relates to the effectiveness in expressing oneself orally, and the S-EOCS “Showmanship”, which describes rather how to be dynamic and capture the attention of the audience. The overall evaluation of the PACOS shows that this questionnaire has good psychometric qualities and that the components obtained during the validation process support the theoretical model.
Keywords:
- perceptions,
- attitude,
- self-efficacy,
- scientific oral communication
Resumo
A capacidade de comunicar oralmente é importante em ciências, mas poucas ferramentas avaliam as perceções e atitudes dos alunos em programas científicos em relação à comunicação oral em ciências. Esta investigação propõe a criação, por um lado, de um modelo teórico de comunicação oral em ciências e, por outro, de um questionário de acordo com esse modelo intitulado Perceções e atitude em relação à comunicação oral em ciência (PACOS) para estudantes do pós-secundário. Uma amostra total de 1.295 estudantes universitários de ciências naturais do Quebeque participou nesta investigação, respondendo a três versões sucessivas do questionário PACOS ao longo da sua elaboração. Cinco fatores foram identificados através de análises de componentes principais (PCA) e por uma análise fatorial confirmatória (CFA), a saber, prazer, ansiedade, perceção de relevância, bem como dois aspetos do sentimento de autoeficácia durante a comunicação oral em ciências (SEPCOS) que surgiram durante a elaboração do questionário : o SEPCOS « normas e conteúdo », que diz respeito à eficácia de se expressar oralmente, e o SEPCOS « sentido do espetáculo », que descreve antes o modo de ser e de captar a atenção do público. A avaliação global do PACOS mostra que este questionário possui boas qualidades psicométricas e que os fatores obtidos durante o processo de validação corroboram o modelo teórico.
Palavras chaves:
- percepções,
- atitude,
- senso de autoeficácia,
- comunicação oral em ciência
Appendices
Références
- Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence : The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4-12. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
- Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27-58. https ://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
- Amirian, S. M. R., & Tavakoli, E. (2016). Academic oral presentation self-efficacy : A cross-sectional interdisciplinary comparative study. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1095-1110. https ://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1160874
- Australian Qualifications Framework. (2013). AQF specification for the Masters Degree. Australian Government. http://www.aqf.edu.au
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy : Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https ://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action : A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy : The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
- Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan, Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, p. 307-337). Information Age Publishing.
- Bandura, A. (2019). Auto-efficacité : comment le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle influence notre qualité de vie (trad. J. Lecomte, 3e éd.). De Boeck Supérieur. https ://www.deboecksuperieur.com/ouvrage/9782807326811-auto-efficacite
- Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075-1093. https ://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701344966
- Batenburg, E. S. L. V., Oostdam, R. J., Gelderen, A. J. S. V., Fukkink, R. G., & Jong, N. H. D. (2019). Oral interaction in the EFL classroom : The effects of instructional focus and task type on learner affect. The Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 308-326. https ://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12545
- Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS Structural Equations Program Manual (version 6) [Software]. Multivariable Software, Inc.
- Blanchet, P.-A., Lison, C. & Lépine, M. (2017). L’enseignement de la compétence orale dans les cours de français du collégial : quels choix de contenus? Dans C. Dumais, R. Bergeron & C. Lavoie (dir.), L’oral et son enseignement : pluralité des contextes linguistiques (p. 103-125). Peisaj.
- Bodie, G. D. (2010). A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts : Defining, explaining, and treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 59(1), 70-105. https ://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903443849
- Boudreau, C., MacIntyre, P. D., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2018). Enjoyment and anxiety in second language communication : An idiodynamic approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 149. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.7
- Bouffard-Bouchard, T. & Pinard, A. (1988). Sentiment d’auto-efficacité et exercice des processus d’autorégulation chez des étudiants de niveau collégial. International Journal of Psychology, 23(1-6), 409-431. https ://doi.org/10.1080/00207598808247776
- Brewer, C. A., & Smith, D. (2009). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education : A call to action [Final report of national conference]. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. https ://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
- Bursal, M. (2012). Changes in American preservice elementary teachers’ efficacy beliefs and anxieties during a science methods course. Science Education International, 23(1), 40-55. https ://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ975549.pdf
- Cameron, C., & Dickfos, J. (2014). ‘‘Lights, camera, action!’’ Video technology and students’ perceptions of oral communication in accounting education. Accounting Education, 23(2), 135-154. https ://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2013.847326
- Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. workforce. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. https ://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED519465
- Chan, V. (2011). Teaching oral communication in undergraduate science : Are we doing enough and doing it right? Journal of Learning Design, 4(3), 71-79. https ://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ940652.pdf
- Chesebro, J. W., McCroskey, J. C., Atwater, D. F., Bahrenfuss, R. M., Cawelti, G., Gaudino, J. L., & Hodges, H. (1992). Communication apprehension and self-perceived communication competence of at-risk students. Communication Education, 41, 345-360. https ://doi.org/10.1080/03634529209378897
- Choi, N. G. (2003). Determinants of self-perceived changes in health status among pre- and early-retirement populations. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 56(3), 197-222. https ://doi.org/10.2190/T8JD-1P30-6MFT-8WHA
- Corriveau, G. & Langlois, S. (2011). Pour un meilleur engagement des garçons et des filles au laboratoire de physique. Pédagogie collégiale, 24(3), 37-44. http://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/21815
- De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2009). The impact of goal orientation, self-reflection and personal characteristics on the acquisition of oral presentation skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(3), 293. https ://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174762
- Demir, S. (2017). An evaluation of oral language : The relationship between listening, speaking and self-efficacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(9), 1457-1467. https ://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050903
- Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237-274. https ://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5
- Dumais, C. et Granger, N. (2017). Intégrer l’oral au cours de science et technologie au secondaire. Spectre, 46(2), 26-29. https ://www.academia.edu/34793836/Int %C3 %A9grer_l_oral_au_cours_de_science_et_technologie_au_secondaire
- Dunbar, N. E., Brooks, C. F., & Kubicka-Miller, T. (2006). Oral communication skills in higher education : Using a performance-based evaluation rubric to assess communication skills. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 115. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9012-x
- Dussault, M., Valois, P. et Frenette, E. (2007). Validation de l’Échelle de leadership transformatif du directeur d’école. Psychologie du travail et des organisations, 13, 37-52. https ://www.researchgate.net/publication/289676242_Validation_de_l’Echelle_de_Leadership_Transformatif_du_Directeur_d’Ecole
- Dwyer, K. K., & Fus, D. A. (2002). Perceptions of communication competence, self- efficacy, and trait communication apprehension : Is there an impact on basic course success? Communication Research Reports, 19(1), 29-37. https ://doi.org/10.1080/08824090209384829
- Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. https ://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
- Edmondston, J. E., Dawson, V., & Schibeci, R. (2010). Undergraduate biotechnology students’ views of science communication. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 2451-2474. https ://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903514598
- Ellis, K. (1995). Apprehension, self-perceived competency, and teacher immediacy in the laboratory-supported public speaking course : Trends and relationships. Communication Education, 44(1), 64-78. https ://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509378998
- Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using SPSS : North American edition (5th ed.). SAGE.
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement : Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https ://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
- Galand, B. & Vanlede, M. (2004). Le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle dans l’apprentissage et la formation : quel rôle joue-t-il ? D’où vient-il ? Comment intervenir ? Savoirs, hors série(5), 91-116. https ://doi.org/10.3917/savo.hs01.0091
- Gaudreau, N., Frenette, E. et Thibodeau, S. (2015). Élaboration de l’Échelle du sentiment d’efficacité personnelle des enseignants en gestion de classe (ÉSEPGC). Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 38(2), 31-60. https ://doi.org/10.7202/1036762ar
- Hasni, A., Potvin, P., Belletête, V. & Thibault, F. (2015). L’intérêt pour les sciences et la technologie à l’école : résultats d’une enquête auprès d’élèves du primaire et du secondaire au Québec [rapport de recherche]. UQAM et Université de Sherbrooke. https ://www.usherbrooke.ca/creas/fileadmin/sites/creas/documents/Publications/Productions_internes/Hasni-Potvin-Rapport-CRIJEST-2015-VF.pdf
- Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https ://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling : A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https ://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Jones, M. G., & Leagon, M. (2014). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, p. 830-843). Routledge.
- Kazempour, M. (2014). I can’t teach science! A case study of an elementary pre-service teacher’s intersection of science experiences, beliefs, attitude, and self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.204a
- Kerby, D., & Romine, J. (2009). Develop oral presentation skills through accounting curriculum design and course-embedded assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 85(3), 172-179. https ://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903252389
- Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science : Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50. https ://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
- Kulgemeyer, C. (2018). Impact of secondary students’ content knowledge on their communication skills in science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 89-108. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9762-6
- Kulgemeyer, C., & Schecker, H. (2013). Students explaining science : Assessment of science communication competence. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2235-2256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9354-1
- Leggett, M., Kinnear, A., Boyce, M., & Bennett, I. (2004). Student and staff perceptions of the importance of generic skills in science. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 295-312. https ://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000235418
- Lucchetti, A. E., Phipps, G. L., & Behnke, R. R. (2003). Trait anticipatory public speaking anxiety as a function of self-efficacy expectations and self-handicapping strategies. Communication Research Reports, 20(4), 348-356. https ://doi.org/10.1080/08824090309388834
- McCroskey, J. C. (2009). Communication apprehension : What have we learned in the last four decades. Human Communication, 12(2), 179-187. https ://www.researchgate.net/publication/254840900_Communication_Apprehension_What_Have_We_Learned_in_the_Last_Four_Decades
- McLaren, I. (2019). Science students’ responses to an oral communication skills development initiative : Attitude and motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(1), 73-85. https ://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1206982.pdf
- Mercer-Mapstone, L. D., & Kuchel, L. (2015). Teaching scientists to communicate : Evidence-based assessment for undergraduate science education. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1613-1638. https ://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045959
- Mercer-Mapstone, L. D., & Matthews, K. E. (2017). Student perceptions of communication skills in undergraduate science at an Australian research-intensive university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 98-114. https ://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1084492
- Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur (MELS). (1998). Sciences de la nature (200.B0) : programme d’études préuniversitaires – Enseignement collégial. Gouvernement du Québec. http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/site_web/documents/enseignement-superieur/200.B0-Sciences-nature-VF.pdf
- Mulder, H. A. J., Longnecker, N., & Davis, L. S. (2008). The state of science communication programs at universities around the world. Science Communication, 30(2), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1075547008324878
- Ng, K. T., Lay, Y. F., Areepattamannil, S., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2012). Relationship between affect and achievement in science and mathematics in Malaysia and Singapore. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 225-237. https ://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.708655
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
- Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science : A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https ://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
- Paradewari, D. S. (2017). Investigating students’ self-efficacy of public speaking. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(10), 97-108. http://ijern.com/journal/2017/October-2017/09.pdf
- Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. https ://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
- Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784-802. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9512-x
- Rajput, A. S. D. (2017). Science communication as an academic discipline : An Indian perspective. Current Science, 113(12), 2262-2267. https ://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/113/12/2262.pdf
- Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168-184. https ://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
- Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625-637. https ://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740605
- Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation : A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 641-669. https ://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.641
- Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation : A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70-83. https ://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
- Smith, E. V. Jr., Wakely, M. B., De Kruif, R. E. L., & Swartz, C. W. (2003). Optimizing rating scales for self-efficacy (and other) research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(3), 369-391. https ://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403063003002
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis : Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. https ://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000
- Toland, M. D., & Usher, E. L. (2016). Assessing mathematics self-efficacy : How many categories do we really need? The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(7), 932-960. https ://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615588952
- Tsai, C.-C. (2002). Nested epistemologies : Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771-783. https ://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049132
- van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2013). Measuring primary teachers’ attitudes toward teaching science : Development of the Dimensions of Attitude Toward Science (DAS) Instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 577-600. https ://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.755576
- van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Walma van der Molen, J. H., & Asma, L. J. F. (2012). Primary teachers’ attitudes toward science : A new theoretical framework. Science Education, 96(1), 158-182. https ://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20467
- Venturini, P. (2007). L’envie d’apprendre les sciences : motivations, attitudes, rapport aux savoirs scientifiques. Fabert.
- Viau, R. (2009). La motivation en contexte scolaire (5e éd.). De Boeck. https ://www.deboecksuperieur.com/ouvrage/9782804111489-la-motivation-en-contexte-scolaire
- Viau, R., Joly, J. & Bédard, D. (2004). La motivation des étudiants en formation des maîtres à l’égard d’activités pédagogiques innovatrices. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 30(1), 163-176. https ://doi.org/10.7202/011775ar
- Zembylas, M. (2002). Constructing genealogies of teachers’ emotions in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 79-103. https ://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10010