Abstracts
Résumé
Cette étude vise à valider des échelles en langue française destinées à mesurer les perceptions qu’ont les élèves de 5e secondaire (16 ans) du climat de soutien dans leur classe de mathématiques. Se basant sur la théorie de l’autodétermination (Deci et Ryan, 2000a, 2000b) et, plus spécifiquement, sur la satisfaction des trois besoins fondamentaux, les échelles utilisées étayent le troisième pilier du modèle tridimensionnel d’un enseignement de qualité de Klieme et ses collaborateurs (2006). Les résultats d’analyses factorielles exploratoires et confirmatoires ont abouti à quatre échelles dont les qualités psychométriques sont satisfaisantes. La présente recherche examine également les différences de perceptions du climat de soutien en mathématiques en fonction du genre. Si aucune différence n’est trouvée pour trois échelles, les analyses indiquent que, de manière significative, les filles perçoivent davantage l’implication de leur enseignant que les garçons, et ce, même sous contrôle du niveau socioéconomique et des performances en mathématiques.
Mots-clés :
- climat de soutien,
- mathématiques,
- perceptions par les élèves,
- genre,
- validation d’échelles
Abstract
This study aims at validating a French version of scales designed to measure students’ perceptions of supportive climate in mathematics in grade 11 (16 years old). Based on Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000a, 2000b), and more precisely on the fulfillment of the three psychological basic needs, the scales focus one of the three basic dimensions of Klieme et al.’s model of instructional quality (Klieme et al., 2006). Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed that the four scales present good psychometric properties. The current study also investigates gender differences in students’ perceptions of supportive climate in mathematics. If no gender differences are found for three scales, results show that girls perceive more significantly teacher social and academic support than boys, even under control of their socioeconomic status and their math abilities.
Keywords:
- supportive climate,
- mathematics,
- students’ perceptions,
- gender,
- scales validation
Resumo
O objetivo deste estudo é validar as escalas em língua francesa destinadas a medir as perceções dos alunos do 5.º secundário (16 anos de idade) sobre o clima de apoio nas aulas de matemática. Com base na teoria da autodeterminação (Deci & Ryan, 2000a, 2000b) e, mais especificamente, na satisfação das três necessidades fundamentais, as escalas utilizadas suportam o terceiro pilar do modelo tridimensional de um ensino de qualidade de Klieme e dos seus colaboradores (2006). Os resultados das análises fatoriais exploratórias e confirmatórias geraram quatro escalas cujas qualidades psicométricas são satisfatórias. A presente investigação também examina as diferenças de perceções do clima de apoio em matemática em função do género. Embora não haja diferença para três escalas, as análises indicam que, significativamente, as meninas percebem o envolvimento do professor mais do que os meninos, mesmo sob o controlo do nível socioeconómico e dos desempenhos em matemática.
Palavras chaves:
- clima de apoio,
- matemática,
- perceções dos estudantes,
- género,
- validação de escalas
Appendices
Références
- Baillargeon, J. (2006). L’analyse factorielle confirmatoire. Document inédit, Trois-Rivières : Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. doi: 10.3102/0002831209345157
- Bourque, J., Poulin, N. et Cleaver, A. (2006). Évaluation de l’utilisation et de la présentation des résultats d’analyses factorielles et d’analyses en composantes principales en éducation. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 32(2), 325-344. doi: 10.7202/014411ar
- Clarke, I. (2000). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(1), 137-152.
- Cudeck, R. (2000). Exploratory factor analysis. In H. Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 265-296). San Jose, CA: California Academic Press.
- Davison, A. et Sardy, S. (2006). Méthodes de rééchantillonnage pour l’estimation de variance en sondage. Journal de la Société française de statistique, 147(3), 3-32. Repéré à www.numdam.org/item?id=JSFS_2006__147_3_3_0
- Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000a). The “what” and the “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
- Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000b). Self-Determination Theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
- Dietrich, J., Dicke, A.-L., Kracke, B., & Noack, P. (2015). Teacher support and its influence on students’ intrinsic value and effort: Dimensional comparison effects across subjects. Learning and Instruction, 39, 45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.007
- Eccles, J. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195-201. doi: 10.1177/0165025411398185
- Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
- Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 55-69. doi: 10.1007/BF00311015
- Fryer, R., & Levitt, S. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 210-240. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/25760212
- Gibbons, S. (2014). Relatedness-supportive learning environment for girls in physical education. LEARNing Landscapes, 7(2), 139-150.
- Gillet, N., Rosnet, E. et Vallerand, R. J. (2008). Développement d’une échelle de satisfaction des besoins fondamentaux en contexte sportif. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40(4), 230-237. doi: 10.1037/a0013201
- Goffin, C., Quittre, V. et Lafontaine, D. (2010). Filles et garçons face à l’orientation scientifique : stéréotypes en tous genres. Dans C. Gavray et A. Adriaenssens (dir.), Une fille=un garçon ? Identifier les inégalités de genre à l’école pour mieux les combattre (pp. 103-127). Paris : L’Harmattan.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
- Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=183
- Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600. doi: 10.1037/a0019682
- Klieme, E., Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K. et Ratska, N. (2006). Qualitätsdimensionen und Wirksamkeit von Mathematikunterricht. Theoretische Grundlagen und ausgewählte Ergebnisse des Projekts “Pythagoras”. Dans M. Prenzel et L. Allolio-Näcke (dir.), Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule: Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms (pp. 123-146). Münster, Allemagne: Waxmann.
- Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environments Research, 9(3), 231-251. doi: 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7
- Lafontaine, D. (2016). Évaluations à large échelle : prendre la juste mesure des effets de contexte. Dans P. Detroz, M. Crahay et A. Fagnant (dir.), L’évaluation à la lumière des contextes et des disciplines (pp. 21-51). Belgique : De Boeck.
- Lafontaine, D. et Monseur, C. (2009). Les évaluations des performances mathématiques sont-elles influencées par le sexe de l’élève ? Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 32(2), 71-98. doi: 10.7202/1024955ar
- Lazarides, R., & Watt, H. (2015). Girls’ and boys’ perceived mathematics teacher beliefs, classroom learning environments and mathematical career intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 51-61. Retrieved from http://users.monash.edu.au/~hwatt/articles/Lazarides&Watt_CEP2015.pdf
- Leroy, N., Bressoux, P., Sarrazin, P. et Trouilloud, D. (2013). Un modèle sociocognitif des apprentissages scolaires : style motivationnel de l’enseignant, soutien perçu des élèves et processus motivationnels. Revue française de pédagogie, 182, 71-92. doi: 10.4000/rfp.4008
- Marin, G., Gamba, R. J., & Marin, B. V. (1992). Extreme response style and acquiescence among Hispanics: The role of acculturation and education. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23(4), 498-509. doi: 10.1177/0022022192234006
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modelling. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275-340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998/2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- OCDE. (2005). Apprendre aujourd’hui, réussir demain : premiers résultats de PISA 2003. OECD Publishing.
- OCDE. (2012). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn. Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (vol. III). OECD Publishing.
- OCDE. (2014a). Are boys and girls equally prepared for life? OECD Publishing. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PIF-2014-gender-international-version.pdf
- OCDE. (2014b). PISA 2012: Technical report. OECD Publishing.
- Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175. doi: 10.1080/00461520903028990
- Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-Determination Theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
- Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-Determination Theory: A dialectical framework for understanding the sociocultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. Melnerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (vol. 4, pp. 31-59). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
- Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
- Rice, L., Barth, J., Guadagno, R., Smith, G., & McCallum, D. (2013). The role of social support in students’ perceived abilities and attitudes toward math and science. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 42, 1028-104. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9801-8
- Riegle-Crumb, C., & Humphries, M. (2012). Exploring bias in math teachers’ perceptions of students’ ability by gender and race/ethnicity. Gender & Society, 26(2), 290-322. doi: 10.1177/0891243211434614
- Robinson, J., Lubienski, S., Ganley, C., & Copur-Gencturk Y. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ mathematics proficiency may exacerbate early gender gaps in achievement. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1262-1281. doi: 10.1037/a00350 73
- Roorda, D., Kroomen, H., Spilt, J., & Oort, F. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. doi: 10.3102/0034654311421793
- Rouyer, V., Mieyaa, Y. et Le Blanc, A. (2014). Socialisation de genre et construction des identités sexuées: contextes sociétal et scientifique, acquis de la recherche et implications pratiques. Revue française de pédagogie, 187, 97-137. doi: 10.4000/ rfp.4494
- Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2010). Teacher expectations and perceptions of student characteristics: Is there a relationship? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 121-135. doi: 10.1348/000709909X466334
- Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Gregory A., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R. C. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
- Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.10.005
- Sarrazin, P., Pelletier, L., Deci, E. et Ryan, R. (2011). Nourrir une motivation autonome et des conséquences positives dans différents milieux de vie : les apports de la théorie de l’autodétermination. Dans C. Martin-Krumm et C. Tarquinio (dir.), Traité de psychologie positive (chap. 13, pp. 273-312). Bruxelles : De Boeck.
- Sarrazin, P., Tessier, D. et Trouilloud, D. (2006). Climat motivationnel instauré par l’enseignant et implication des élèves en classe : l’état des recherches. Revue française de pédagogie, 157, 147-177. doi: 10.4000/rfp.463
- Skinner, E., & Belmont, J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
- Su, Y.-L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 159-188. Retrieved from https://bmri.korea.ac.kr/file/board_data/publications/1315188270_1.pdf
- Taylor, B. A., & Fraser B. J. (2013). Relationship between learning environment and mathematics anxiety. Learning Environments Research, 16, 297-313. doi: 10.1007/ s10984-013-9134-x
- Tiedemann, J. (2000). Gender-related beliefs of teachers in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 191-207. doi: 10.1023/A: 1003953 801526
- Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 49-62. doi: 10.1023/A:1020518104346
- Wang, M.-T. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1643-1657. doi: 10.1037/a0027247
- Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33, 304-340. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2013. 08.001
- Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. (2014). Multilevel predictors of math classroom climate: A comparison study of student and teacher perceptions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(3), 617-634. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/134188/jora12153.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Warm, T. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427-450. doi: 10.1007/BF02294627
- Yang, Y., Harkness, J., Chin T.-Z., & Villar, A. (2012). Response styles and culture. In J. Harkness, M. Braun, B. Edwards, T. Johnson, L. Lyberg, P. Mohler, B.-E. Pennell, & T. Smith (Eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (chap. 12, pp. 203-223). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
10.7202/014411ar