Abstracts
Résumé
L’Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) incite fortement les facultés d’administration des affaires à la mise en place des standards de l’Assurance of Learning. Selon ces standards, les professeurs doivent s’assurer qu’un apprentissage a lieu pour chacun des buts des programmes (qui doivent refléter les compétences attendues sur le marché du travail). Afin de mesurer le degré d’atteinte de ces buts, une diversité de méthodes d’évaluation est utilisée. À ce jour, très peu d’études ont porté sur l’opinion des étudiants face à l’utilisation de ces méthodes d’évaluation (attrait, perception d’efficacité, équité, anxiété générée, niveau cognitif mobilisé). Cette étude consiste à évaluer ces différents aspects (n = 95). L’analyse des résultats indique que les étudiants possèdent une opinion différente selon la méthode d’évaluation considérée. La discussion porte sur l’importance d’utiliser ces méthodes d’évaluation pour répondre aux standards de l’AACSB.
Mots-clés :
- opinion,
- étudiants,
- méthodes d’évaluation,
- administration des affaires,
- AACSB
Abstract
The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) strongly incites business schools to implement Assurance of Learning standards. These standards stipulate that faculties must ensure that learning occurs for each of their programs’ learning outcomes, which in turn, must reflect the competencies expected by the business community. In order to measure the degree of achievement of these learning outcomes, a variety of assessment methods is used. To date, very few studies have examined students’ opinions regarding the use of these methods (preference, efficiency, fairness, anxiety, cognitive process level). This study aims to further this knowledge (n = 95). Analysis of the results indicates that students have different opinion depending on the evaluation method considered. The discussion relates to the importance of using these evaluation methods to meet AACSB standards.
Keywords:
- opinion,
- students,
- evaluation methods,
- business education,
- AACSB
Resumo
A Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) incita fortemente as faculdades de gestão a implementar standards de Assurance of Learning. Segundo estes standards, os professores devem assegurar que uma aprendizagem tenha lugar para cada um dos objetivos do programa (que devem refletir as competências esperadas pelo mercado de trabalho). Para assegurar o grau de concretização destes objetivos, uma diversidade de métodos de avaliação é utilizada. Até à data, muito poucos estudos examinaram a opinião dos estudantes face à utilização destes métodos de avaliação (preferência, perceção da eficácia, equidade, ansiedade gerada, nível cognitivo mobilizado). Este estudo consiste em avaliar estes diferentes aspetos (n=95). A análise dos resultados indica que os estudantes possuem uma opinião diferente segundo o método de avaliação considerado. A discussão analisa a importância de utilizar estes métodos de avaliação para responder aos standards AACSB.
Palavras chaves:
- opinião,
- estudantes,
- métodos de avaliação,
- administração educativa,
- AACSB
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Références
- Anderson, P. S. (1987, octobre). Comparison of student attitudes about seven formats of educational testing, with emphasis on the MDT Mutli-Digit Testing technique. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western educational research association, Chicago, Illinois. (ERIC Document ED 295999).
- Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge. Ma: Harvard University Press.
- Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACAB) International. (2010). Accreditation – Accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/AAACSB-STANDARDs-2010.pdf
- Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) International. (2007). AACSB Assurance of Learning standards: An Interpretation. retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/Papers/aoLPaper-final-11-20-07.pdf
- Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) International. (2004). Ethics education in business schools: Report of the ethics education task force to AACSB International’s board of directors. retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/resource_Centers/EthicsEdu/EthicsEdu-in-B-schools.pdf
- Ben-Chaim, D., & Zoller, U. (1997). Examination-type preferences of secondary school students and their teachers in the science disciplines. Instructional science, 25 (5), 347-367. doi:10.1023/a:1002919422429
- Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: Towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy, (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 3-29) . Boston, Ma: Kluwer academic.
- Birenbaum, M. (1997). Toward adaptive assessment ‒ the student’s angle. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20 (2), 239-255.
- Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
- Brewer, P. D., & Brewer, K. L. (2010). Knowledge management, human resource management, and higher education: a theoretical model. Journal of Education for Business, 85 (6), 330-335. doi:10.1080/08832321003604938
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., Dissou, G., & Heaven, P. (2005). Personality and preference for academic assessment: a study with australian university students. Learning and Individual Differences, 15 (4), 247-256. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.02.002
- Cowan, M. M., & Piepgrass, K. W. (1997). Attitudes about science among non-majors at a two-year campus of a liberal arts university. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED411034).
- Eder, D. J. (2004). General education assessment within the disciplines. The Journal of General Education, 53 (2), 135-157. doi:10.1353/jge.2004.0026
- Fallan, L. (2006). Quality reform: Personality type, preferred learning style and majors in a business school. Quality in Higher Education, 12 (2), 193-206. doi:10.1080/13538320600916817
- Fernandes, S., Flores, M. A., & Lima, R. M. (2012). Students’ views of assessment in project-led engineering education: findings from a case study in Portugal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37 (2), 163-178. doi:10.1080/02602938. 2010.515015
- Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS, (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
- Forgette-Giroux, R., Simon, M., & Lariviere, M. B. (1996). Les pratiques d’évaluation des apprentissages en salle de classe: perception des enseignantes et des enseignants. Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 21 (4), 384-395. doi:10.2307/1494892
- Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2005). Individual differences and beliefs concerning preference for university assessment methods. Journal of Applied social Psychology, 35 (9), 1968-1994. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02205.x
- Furnham, A., Christopher, A., Garwood, J., & Martin, N. G. (2008). Ability, demography, learning style, and personality trait correlates of student preference for assessment method. Educational Psychology, 28 (1), 15-27. doi:10.1080/01443410701369138
- Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006). Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: can formative assessment make a difference? Educational studies, 32 (4), 399-409. doi:10.1080/03055690600850354
- Halawi, L., McCarthy, R., & Pires, S. (2009). An evaluation of e-learning on the basis of bloom’s taxonomy: an exploratory study. Journal of Education for Business, 84 (6), 374-380. doi:10.3200/JoEB.84.6.374-380
- Hansen, R. S. (2006). Benefits and problems with student teams: suggestions for improving team projects. Journal of Education for Business, 82 (1), 11-19. doi:10.3200/JoEB.82.1.11-19
- Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58 (1), 47-77. doi:10.3102/00346543058001047
- Herbert, I., Joyce, J., & Hassall, T. (2009). Maintaining alignment in management education: the potential for drift in assessment. International Journal of Management Education, 7 (2), 21-31.
- Hindi, N., & Miller, D. (2000). A survey of assessment practices in accounting departments of colleges and universities. Journal of Education for Business, 75 (5), 286-290. doi:10.1080/08832320009599030
- Holmgren, M. A. (2008). Assessment of student in MBA programs: a study of higher learning commission accredited institutions (thèse de doctorat non publiée). Lincoln University, Nebraska.
- Jackson, C., & Tinkler, P. (2001). Back to basics: a consideration of the purposes of the Ph.D. Viva. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (4), 355-366. doi:10.1080/02602930120063501
- Kottke, J. L., & shultz, K. s. (1997). Using an assessment center as a developmental tool for graduate students: a demonstration. Journal of social Behavior and Personality, 12 (5), 289-302.
- Lakhal, S., Sevigny, S., & Frenette, E. (2011, janvier). L’opinion des étudiants universitaires en sciences de l’administration par rapport aux méthodes d’évaluation utilisées dans leurs cours. Communication orale presentée au 23e colloque de l’association pour le développement des méthodologies d’évaluation en éducation, section Europe (ADMEE-Europe). Paris, France.
- Legendre, R. (2005). Dictionnaire actuel de l’éducation (3e ed.). Montréal: Guérin.
- Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20 (8), 15-21. doi:10.3102/0013189X020008015
- MacLellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: the differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (4), 307-318. doi:10.1080/02602930120063466
- Martell, K. (2007). Assessing student learning: are business schools making the grade? Journal of Education for Business, 82 (4), 189-195. doi:10.3200/JoEB.82.4.189-195
- Marzano, R. J., Brant, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseinsen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C. & Suhor, C., (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Mayotte, S. (2010). Online assessment of problem solving skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (6), 1253-1258. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.033
- McKeachie, W. (2006). Mckeachie’s teaching tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. (12e ed.). Boston, Ma: Houghton Mifflin Compagny.
- Messick, s. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23 (2), 13-23. doi:10.2307/1176219
- Michlitsch, J. F., & Sidle, M. E. (2002). Assessing student learning outcomes: a comparative study of techniques used in business school disciplines. Journal of Education for Business, 77 (3), 125-130. doi:10.1080/08832320209599060
- Ministere de l’éducation du Québec (1996). Guide de détermination des compétences. Direction générale de la formation professionnelle et technique. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
- Nicholson, C. Y., & DeMoss, M. (2009). Teaching Ethics and social responsibility: an Evaluation of undergraduate Business Education at the Discipline Level. Journal of Education for Business, 84 (4), 213-218. doi:10.3200/JoEB.84.4.213-218
- Palomba, C. A. (2001). Implementing effective assessment. In Assessing student competence in accredited disciplines. Pioneering approaches to assessment in higher education. Sterling, Va: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
- Pearce, G., & Lee, G. (2009). Viva voce (oral examination) as an assessment method: Insights from marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 31 (2), 120-130. doi:10.1177/0273475309334050
- Pregent, R. (1990). La préparation d’un cours. Montréal: éditions de l’école polytechnique de Montréal.
- Riggio, R. E., Mayes, B. T., & Schleicher, D. J. (2003). Using assessment center methods for measuring undergraduate business student outcome. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12 (1), 68-78. doi:10.1177/1056492602250519
- Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). But is it fair? An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23 (4), 349-371. doi:10.1016/s0191-491X(97)86215-3
- Sarason, I. G., & Stoops, R. (1978). Anxiety at the time of the final exam: relationships with expectations and performance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 (1), 102-109. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.46.1.102
- Scallon G. (2004). L’évaluation des apprentissages dans une approche par compétences. Saint-Laurent, Qc: Éditions du renouveau pédagogique.
- Scallon, G. (1988). L’évaluation formative des apprentissages, la réflexion. Quebec: Presses de l’Universite Laval.
- Schleigh, S. (2008). The interaction of assessment format and sex in assessing the knowledge structure coherence of middle school students' understanding of the concept of force (thèse de doctorat non publiée). Arizona State University, Arizona.
- Seipp, B. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: a meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety Research, 4 (1), 27-41. doi:10.1080/08917779108248762
- Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessment in science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4 (4), 347-362. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0404_7
- Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (4), 325-341. doi:10.1080/02602930500099102
- Thomson, K. R. (2004). A conversation with Milton Blood: the new aaCsB standards. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3 (4), 429-439.
- Toohey, S. (1999). Designing courses for higher education. Buckingham: the society for research into Higher Education and open university Press.
- Van de Watering, G., Gijbel, D., Dochy, F., & Van der Rijt, J. (2008). Students’ assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 56 (6), 645-658. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9116-6
- Wiggins, G., & Mctighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. (Expanded 2nd ed.) USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Willis, D. (1993). Learning and assessment: exposing the inconsistencies of theory and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 19 (3), 383-402. doi:10.1080/0305498930190309
- Zeidner, M. (1987). Essay versus multiple-choice type classroom exams: the student’s perspective. Journal of Educational Research, 80 (6), 352-358.
- Zoller, U., & Ben-Chaim, D. (1988). Interaction between examination type, anxiety state, and academic achievement in college science; an action-oriented research. Journal of Research in science Teaching, 26 (1), 65-77.
- Zoller, U., & Ben-Chaim, D. (1990). Gender differences in examination-type preferences, test anxiety, and academic achievements in college science education-a case study. science Education, 74 (6), 597-608. doi:10.1002/sce.3730740603