Abstracts
Résumé
En suisse, les institutions d’enseignement supérieur disposent d’une autonomie importante pour implémenter leur modèle d’évaluation des enseignements par les étudiants (EEE). Certaines, comme l’Université de Lausanne, ont opté pour des modèles minimisant la part de contrôle ; d’autres, comme la Haute école d'ingénierie et de gestion du Canton de Vaud, ont préféré contrôler davantage la prestation enseignante. L’espace suisse de l’enseignement supérieur constitue donc un terrain de recherche intéressant pour s’interroger sur les impacts de l’EEE. Dans le présent travail, les auteurs ont opté pour une étude de cas mobilisant des données quantitatives et qualitatives afin de chercher à comprendre si l’impact sur le développement professionnel des enseignants et l’expérience d’apprentissage des étudiants diffère selon le modèle d’EEE utilisé. sur la base des résultats, les auteurs débattront du développement professionnel des enseignants et de l’expérience d’apprentissage des étudiants en lien avec l’EEE, puis concluront avec quelques perspectives de recherches futures.
Mots-clés :
- évaluation des enseignements par les étudiants,
- expérience d’apprentissage,
- développement professionnel,
- contrôle versus soutien,
- étude de cas
Abstract
In switzerland, higher education institutions have a high level of independance regarding the implementation of evaluation of teaching by students. some institutions such as the University of Lausanne have opted for models keeping control to a minimum ; other institutions, such as the yverdon school of Engineering and Business, have chosen to put in place a system that aims at controlling the performance of teachers. swiss higher education institutions offer an interesting ground for research into the impact of teaching evaluation policies. In this paper, the authors chose a mixed qualitative and quantitative case study approach in order to examine the impact of different students ratings processes on fostering the professional development of teachers and the learning experience of students. They conclude the paper with suggestions for further research.
Keywords:
- students ratings,
- student learning experience,
- professional development,
- control versus support,
- case study
Resumo
Avaliação dos professores pelos estudantes (APE). Algumas, como a Universidade de Lausanne, optaram por modelos que minimizam a parte do controlo ; outras, como a Escola superior de Gestão do Cantão de Vaud, preferiram, pelo contrário, controlar a prestação do professor. O espaço suíço do ensino superior constitui, assim, um terreno interessante de investigação para se interrogar a APE. No presente trabalho, os autores optaram por um estudo de caso, mobilizando dados quantitativos e qualitativos, no sentido de procurar compreender se o impacto sobre o desenvolvimento profissional dos professores e a experiência de aprendizagem dos estudantes difere segundo o modelo de APE utilizado. A partir dos resultados, os autores debaterão o desenvolvimento profissional dos professores e a experiência de aprendizagem dos estudantes em ligação com a APE, concluindo com a apresentação de algumas perspetivas de investigações futuras.
Palavras chaves:
- avaliação dos professores pelos alunos,
- experiência de aprendizagem,
- desenvolvimento profissional,
- controlo versus apoio,
- estudo de caso
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Références
- Bernard, H. (2011). Comment évaluer, améliorer, valoriser l’enseignement. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- Berthiaume, D., & Lanares, J. (2009, octobre). Evaluating teaching in order to foster the pro fessional development of university teaching staff. Présentation au colloque de l’OCDE portant sur la qualité en enseignement supérieur, Istamboul, Turquie.
- Berthiaume, D., Lanares, J., Jacqmot, C., Winer, L., & Rochat, J. M. (2012). L’évaluation des enseignements par les étudiants (EEE) comme mesure de soutien au développement professionnel des enseignants. Recherche et formation, 67, 24-32.
- Braskamp, L. A. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performances. San Francisco, Ca Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Centra, J. A. (1993). Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass.
- Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: a metaanalysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281-309. doi:10.3102/00346543051003281
- Hiebert, J., Gallimore R., & Stigler J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: what would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31 (5), 3-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X031005003
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall.
- Mcalpine, L., & Weston, C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. Instructional science, 28, 363-385. doi:10.1023/a:1026583208230
- Merriam, S. B. (1997). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. san Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass.
- Munby, H., Russel, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In v. rirchardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 877-904). Washington, DC: American Educational research association.
- Murray, H. G. (1983). Low inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings on college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educationnal Psychology, 75 (1), 138-149. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.75.1.138
- Rege Colet, N., & Berthiaume, D. (2012). L’évaluation des enseignants universitaires: du contrôle des compétences pédagogiques aux dispositifs de développement professionnel. Spirale, 49, 100-120.
- Romainville, M., & Coggi, C. (2009). L’évaluation de l’enseignement par les étudiants: Approches critiques et pratiques innovantes. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1-22.
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, Ca: SAGE.
- Stes, A., Coertjens, L., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Instructional development for teachers in higher education: Impact on teaching approach. Higher Education, 60 (2), 187–204. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9294-x
- Trigwell, K., Caballero rodriguez, K., & Feifei, H. (2012). Assessing the impact of a university teaching development programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37 (4), 499-511. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.547929
- Younès, N., Rege Colet, N., Detroz, P., & Sylvestre, E. 2012. L’évaluation de l’enseignement par les étudiants, une dynamique paradoxale. In M. Romainville, M. Vantourout, & R. Goasdoue (Eds), Évaluation et enseignement supérieur. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
- Weimer, M., & Firing Lenze, L. (1991). Instructional interventions: a review of the literature on efforts to improve instruction. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 294-333). New York, NY agathon Press.