Abstracts
Abstract
This qualitative and quantitative research investigates the leisure activities of 265 young adolescents in Tasmania, Australia, in relation to their social constructs of home and neighbourhood as private and public spaces, and in the practical contexts of their day to day lives. As these young people search for meaning and identity in a fast changing world dominated by economic and technological globalisation, the symbolic materials available to them both socially and spatially are examined using innovative research methods which involve visual as well as verbal triggers. Findings show that their chosen activities, while reflecting global trends in the use of information and communication technology, focus mainly on friendship network building in the immediate locale and take place predominantly in home and neighbourhood. Favourite places for leisure pursuits also emphasise the importance and idealisation of the ’traditional’ home and of the natural environment in the search for private places in which to withdraw and reflect. Findings also suggest that the adolescents seek private spaces for safe seclusion or group activities with close friends as part of the process of construction of self as a reflexive and symbolic project. The inherently ’conservative’ and highly gendered responses of the sample are discussed in the context of current sociocultural theories linking space, place and identity.
Résumé
Cette étude, à la fois qualitative et quantitative, porte sur les activités de loisir de 265 jeunes adolescentes et adolescents de la Tasmanie, en Australie, et la relation qu’ont ces activités avec leur perception sociale du foyer et du voisinage en tant que lieux privés et publics, cela dans le contexte pratique de leur vie quotidienne. Pendant que ces jeunes se cherchent une raison d’être et une identité dans un monde en constante évolution, dominé par la mondialisation de l’économique et de la technologie, nous examinons le matériel symbolique auquel ils ont accès, socialement et spatialement, à l’aide de méthodes de recherche novatrices comportant l’emploi de déclencheurs visuels et verbaux. Les résultats de l’étude ont permis de constater que les activités que ces jeunes choisissent, bien qu’elles reflètent les tendances mondiales en ce qui concerne l’utilisation des technologies de l’information et de la communication, se concentrent principalement sur l’élaboration de réseaux d’amitié dans leur milieu immédiat, principalement au foyer ou dans le voisinage. Les lieux de loisir qu’ils privilégient font ressortir clairement l’importance et l’idéalisation du foyer « traditionnel » et de l’environnement naturel dans la recherche de lieux privés où il est possible de se retirer et de réfléchir. Les résultats suggèrent également que les adolescents recherchent des espaces privés où ils peuvent s’isoler en sécurité ou mener des activités de groupe avec des amis proches, ceci faisant partie du processus d’affirmation de soi à travers la prise de conscience et la symbolique. Nous examinons l’échantillon des réponses, essentiellement conservatrices et fortement différenciées selon le sexe des répondants, dans le contexte des théories socioculturelles actuelles qui relient espace, lieu et identité.
Resumen
Este estudio, a la vez cualitativo y cuantitativo, trata sobre las actividades de diversión de 265 jóvenes adolescentes de ambos sexos de Tasmania, en Australia, y la relación que tienen esas actividades con su percepción social del hogar y de la vecindad en tanto que lugares privados y públicos, todo esto en el contexto práctico de su vida cotidiana. Mientras estos jóvenes buscan una razón de ser y una identidad en un mundo en constante evolución, dominado por la mundialización de la economía y de la tecnología, nosotros examinamos el material simbólico al cual ellos tienen acceso, social y espacialmente, con la ayuda de métodos de investigación innovadores que permiten el empleo de activadores visuales y verbales. Los resultados del estudio han permitido de constatar que las actividades que estos jóvenes escogen, aunque ellas reflejan las tendencias mundiales en lo que concierne a la utilización de las tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación, se enfocan principalmente en la elaboración de redes de amistad en su medio inmediato, principalmente en el hogar o en la vecindad. Los lugares de diversión que ellos privilegian hacen sobresalir claramente la importancia y la idealización del hogar « tradicional » y del medio ambiente natural en la búsqueda de lugares privados donde es posible retirarse y reflexionar. Los resultados sugieren igualmente que los adolescentes buscan espacios privados donde ellos pueden aislarse en seguridad o tener actividades de grupo con amigos cercanos, todo esto forma parte del proceso de construcción de la personalidad como un proyecto reflexivo y simbólico. Nosotros examinamos la muestra de respuestas, esencialmente conservadoras y fuertemente diferenciadas según el sexo de los que respondieron, en el contexto de teorías socioculturales actuales que unen espacio, lugar e identidad.
Appendices
References
- Abbott-Chapman, J. (2000). Time out, spaced out: Young people making meaning. Youth Studies Australia,19(1): 21-25.
- Abbott-Chapman, J. and Robertson, M. (1999). Home as a private space: Some adolescent constructs. Journal of Youth Studies 2(1), 23-44.
- Abbott-Chapman, J. and Denholm, C. (2001). Adolescents’ risk activities, risk hierarchies and the influence of religiosity. Journal of Youth Studies, 4 (3), 279-298.
- Archer, R. (2001). Welcome. Ten days on the island. Program of events. Hobart, Tasmania.
- Arien, M. (ed.) (1993). Home: A place in the world. New York and London: New York University Press.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (1994). Tasmanian Families. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics Catalogue No. 4426.6.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (1999). Regional statistics Tasmania 1999. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics Catalogue No. 1352.6.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (2000). Australian social trends 2000. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics Catalogue No. 4102.0.
- Bammel, G. and Burrus Bammel, L.L. (1996). Leisure and human behaviour. London, Sydney, Toronto: Brown and Benchmark Publishers. Third edition.
- Bird, J., Curtis, B., Putnam, T., Robertson, G. and Tickner, L. (1993). Mapping the future: Local cultures, global change. London and New York: Routledge.
- Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.C. (1977). Reproduction in education. society and culture. London: Sage.
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital,trans. Richard Nice. In J.G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1988). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Burkeman, O. (2000). Is it the end of the digital dream? Guardian Weekly. Dec. 21-27, page 12.
- Cooper-Marcus, C. (1995). House as a mirror of self. Berkeley, California: Conari Press.
- Douglas, M. (1993). The idea of home: A kind of space. In M. Arien (ed.) Home a place in the world. New York: New York University Press.
- Eckersley, R. (1988). Casualties of change. Collingwood, Vic.: Commission for the Future, CSIRO Publishing.
- Eisenstadt, S.N. (1995). Power, trust and meaning: Essays in sociological theory and analysis. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Goffman, E. (1958). The presentation of self in everyday life. University of Edinburgh, Monograph No. 2. Edinburgh: Social Sciences research Centre.
- Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Hodgetts, J.L. and Hodgetts, W.H. (1996). Finding sanctuary in postmodern life Chapt. 13. In D. Hall (ed.), The career is dead: Long live the career. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Larson, R. and Asmussen, L. (1991). Anger, worry and hurt in early adolescence. In M.E Colten and S. Gore (eds.), Adolescent stress. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
- Lefebvre, H. (1991a). The production of space. Trans. D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
- Lefebvre, H. (1991b). Critique of everyday life. Trans. J. Moore. London: Verso.
- Macnaghten, P. and Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. London: Sage Publications.
- Malone, K. (1998). Fear, flow and the geographies of exclusion. Paper presented at the International Conference Youth 98! Public Spaces, Public Voices. 16-19 April. University of Melbourne.
- Mathews, H., Limb, M. & Smith, B. (1998). Changing worlds: The microgeographies of young teenagers. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Social Geografie,89(2), 193-202.
- McDowell, L. (1999). Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies. Cambridge, Polity Press.
- McKinney, K.D. (1998). Space, body and mind. Journal of Family Issues,19(1), 75-100.
- Moon, L., Meyer, P. and Grau, K. (1999). Australia’s young people. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
- Peet, R. (1998). Modern geographical thought. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- Read, P. (1996). Returning to nothing: The meaning of lost places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rikkinen, H. and Robertson, M. (1998). Kulttuuriympäristö Mielikuvien Muokkaajana Nuoristukimus,16(1), 3-11.
- Roach Anleu, S.L. (1995). Lifting the lid: perspectives in social control, youth crime and juvenile justice. In Ways of resistance: Social control and young people in Australia. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger Publishers.
- Robertson, M. (2000). Young people speak about the environment. Geography, 85(1), 24-36.
- Robertson, M. and Rikkinen, H. (2000). Leisure, recreation and young people’s everyday knowing: a cross-cultural perspective of private and public spaces. Proceedings, Commission on geographical education. 30th Congress of the International Geographical Union, Kyungui, 7-12 August, p. 239-254.
- Robertson, M. and Walford, R.A. (2000). Views and visions of land use in the United Kingdom. The Geographical Journal, 166(3), 24-36.
- Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage Publications.
- Rybczynski, W. (1986). Home: A short history of an idea. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books.
- Sebba, R. (1991). The landscapes of childhood: The reflection of childhood’s environment in adult memories and in children’s attitudes. Environment and Behaviour,23 (4), 395-422.
- Skelton, T. and Valentine, G. (1998). Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures. London: Routledge.
- Smith, N. (1993). Homeless/Global: Scaling Places, Part II Section 6. In J. Bird et al.,Mapping the futures: Local cultures; global change. London and New York: Routledge p. 87-119.
- Squires, J. (1994). Private lives, secluded places: privacy as political possibility. Environment and Planning, 12(4), 387-401.
- Strinati, D. (1995). An introduction to theories of popular culture. London and New York: Routledge.
- Thompson, J.B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Tuan, Yi-Fu (1989). Surface phenomena aesthetic experience. The Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 79 (2), 233-241.
- Winter, I. and Stone, W. (1999). Reconceptualising Australian housing careers. Working Paper No. 17. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.