Abstracts
Abstract
The Right to Read report highlights the fact that children who experience dyslexia are not being adequately supported in Ontario schools. The report’s call for the establishment of a more effective identification and intervention infrastructure within the school system is timely and persuasive. Unfortunately, the Right to Read report advances two unsubstantiated claims to explain the reading difficulties some children experience in the early grades. Specifically, it argues that Ontario schools are failing to teach reading skills effectively for all students, not just those with specific reading disabilities. Second, it attributes this general failure to the fact that most Ontario schools implement a balanced approach to reading instruction, which the report claims, pays insufficient attention to teaching sound/letter correspondences in a systematic, explicit, and intensive way. Neither of these claims is supported by the scientific data. Ontario students are consistently among the top performers in cross-Canada and international comparisons of reading performance. Furthermore, the empirical research is fully consistent with the implementation of a balanced or contextualized approach to literacy instruction that integrates the teaching of sound/symbol relationships with a more general commitment to immerse children into a literacy-rich instructional environment.
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Cummins, J. (2007). Pedagogies for the poor? Re-aligning reading instruction for low-income students with scientifically based reading research. Educational Researcher, 36, 564–572.
- Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663-672.
- Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S., Stahl, S., & Willows, D. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.
- Elley, W. B., & Mangubhai, F. (1983). The impact of reading on second language learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 53–67.
- Escamilla, K., Olsen, L., & Slavick, J. (2022). Toward comprehensive effective literacy policy and instruction for English learner/emergent bilingual students [White Paper]. National Committee for Effective Literacy.
- Flesch, R. (1955). Why Johnny can't read—And what you can do about it. Harper and Brothers.
- Gamse, B. C., Jacob, R. T., Horst, M., Boulay, B., Unlu, F., Bozzi, L., Caswell, L., Rodger, C., Carter Smith, W. C., Brigham, N., & Rosenblum, S. (2009). Reading first impact study final report (NCEE 2009-4038). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20094038_1.pdf
- Gray, A. M., Sirinides, P. M., Fink, R. E., & Bowden, A. B. (2021). Integrating literacy and science instruction in kindergarten: Results from the efficacy Study of Zoology One. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 15(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2021.1938313
- Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Heinemann.
- Lindsay, J. (2010). Children’s access to print material and education-related outcomes: Findings from a meta-analytic review. Learning Point Associates.
- Lindsay, J. J. (2018). Interventions that increase children’s access to print material and improve their reading proficiencies. In R. L. Allington and A. McGill-Franzen (Eds.) Summer reading: Closing the rich/poor reading achievement gap (pp. 41–58). Teachers College Press.
- Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood, Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296.
- National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
- Neuman, S. B. (1999). Books make a difference: A study of access to literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(3), 286-311.
- OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn—student engagement, strategies and practices (Vol 3). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852630.pdf
- OECD (2019). PISA 2018 results : What students know and can do (Vol 1). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
- O’Grady, K., Houme, K., Costa, E., Rostamian, A., & Tao, Y. (2021). PCAP 2019. Report on the Pan-Canadian assessment of mathematics, reading, and science. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. https://www.cmec.ca/Publications/Lists/Publications/Attachments/426/PCAP2019-Public-Report-EN.pdf
- O’Grady, K., Deussing, M-A, Scerbina, Tao, Y., Fung, K., Elez, V., & Monk, J. (2019). Measuring up: Canadian results of the OECD PISA 2018 Study. The performance of Canadian 15-year-Olds in reading, mathematics, and science. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. https://www.cmec.ca/Publications/Lists/Publications/Attachments/396/PISA2018_PublicReport_EN.pdf
- Ontario Human Rights Commission (2022). Right to read: Public inquiry into human rights issues affecting students with reading disabilities. Government of Ontario. https://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/book/export/html/30871
- Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018. Insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf
- Seidenberg, M. S., & Borkenhagen, M. C. (2020). Reading science and educational practice: Some tenets for teachers. The Reading League Journal, 1(1), 7-11.
- Sullivan, A. and Brown, M. (2013). Social inequalities in cognitive scores at age 16: The role of reading. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved from www.cls.ioe.ac.uk
- The Reading League. (2022). Science of reading: Defining guide. https://www.thereadingleague.org/what-is-the-science-of-reading/
- Wylie, C., & Thompson, J. (2003). The long-term contribution of early childhood education to children's performance-evidence from New Zealand. International Journal of Early Years Education, 11(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966976032000066109
- Wyse, D. & Bradbury, A. (2022). Reading wars or reading reconciliation? A critical examination of robust research evidence, curriculum policy and teachers' practices for teaching phonics and reading. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3314