Abstracts
Abstract
This study focused on the acceptance level of higher education stakeholders of teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL) of online courses in Iran and pre-service teachers’ learning achievement in online courses. Three cohorts of participants who were teaching or learning in online courses included pre-service teachers of TEFL (n=104), TEFL university instructors (n=23), and heads of TEFL departments (n=10). A questionnaire was designed. The Kruskal Wallis test was used to detect differences among the perspectives of the participants. Semi-structured interviews were also utilized. Results indicated that there were significant differences among the perspectives of the three groups of participants about online courses. The pre-service teachers appeared to be relatively positive about online learning, while the university instructors and heads of departments showed a lower level of satisfaction. The participants pointed out several challenges, including the lack of rigor of online courses, the incredibility of the certificates, the lack of technological infrastructures, technical problems, the impractical content of the lessons, the lack of human interaction, the low competence levels of online learning students, and employers’ lack of interest in employing graduates of online courses. The participants also mentioned that pedagogical and technological training was required for both university instructors and pre-service teachers of TEFL. The comparison of pre-service teachers’ mid-term and final scores in the online courses showed a significant difference and improvement of students’ learning achievement in online courses with medium to large effect sizes. In the interviews, the participants also confirmed that online courses could improve student learning.
Keywords:
- acceptance,
- challenges,
- online learning,
- preservice teacher training,
- student achievement,
- TEFL stakeholders
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Ahmed Abdullah, N., & Sultana Mirza, M. (2020). Evaluating preservice teaching practice for online and distance education students in Pakistan: Evaluation of teaching practice. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.4606
- bin Mohd Amin, M. R., Kumar Piaralal, S., Rosli bin Daud, Y., & bin Mohamed, B. (2020). An empirical study on service recovery satisfaction in an open and distance learning higher education institution in Malaysia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 36-60. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.4578
- Dashtestani, R. (2014). English as a foreign language—Teachers’ perspectives on implementing online instruction in the Iranian EFL context. Research in Learning Technology, 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.20142
- Fortune, M. F., Spielman, M., & Pangelinan, D. T. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online or face-to-face learning and social media in hospitality, recreation, and tourism. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(14). Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no1/fortune_0311.htm
- Grimes, E. B. (2002). Student perceptions of an online dental terminology course. Journal of Dental Education, 66(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2002.66.1.tb03503.x
- Hughes, M., & Daykin, N. (2002). Towards constructivism: Investigating students’ perceptions and learning as a result of using an online environment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(3), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000210150036
- Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
- Karaman, S. (2011). Nurses’ perceptions of online continuing education. BMC Medical Education, 11, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-86
- Kim, K. J., Liu, S., & Bonk, C. J. (2005). Online MBA students’ perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 335-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.09.005
- Lee, H., Chang, H., & Bryan, L. (2020). Doctoral students’ learning success in online-based leadership programs: Intersection with technological and relational factors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4462
- Lowenthal, P., Bauer, C., & Chen, K. Z. (2015). Student perceptions of online learning: An analysis of online course evaluations. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(2), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.1023621
- Stone, M. T., & Perumean-Chaney, S. (2011). The benefits of online teaching for traditional classroom pedagogy: A case study for improving face-to-face instruction. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 393-400. Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no3/stone_0911.pdf
- Westine, C. D., Oyarzun, B., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Casto, A., Okraski, C., Park, G., Person, J., & Steele, L. (2019). Familiarity, current use, and interest in universal design for learning among online university instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4258