Abstracts
Abstract
Adult professionals enroll in online graduate programs and rely on social support and on their ability to self-regulate to be successful. The literature on academic self-regulation among emerging adults (traditional college age) is ample, but we do not know how social support interacts with academic self-regulation among adult graduate students at mid-career, particularly among those students who are first generation college goers. This study addressed the following questions: (1) To what degree do parental education level and cohort progression predict academic self-regulation? and (2) What sources of social support – family, friends, loved one (significant other), and classmates – are predictive of academic self-regulation for adult students in an online doctoral program? Findings include evidence that the influence of parental educational level on academic self-regulation persists through midlife. Also, that perceived social support from family, friends, and peers predicts academic self-regulation. We conclude with implications for the design of online programs.
Keywords:
- academic self-regulation,
- adults,
- doctoral education,
- first-generation,
- social support
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Andrade, H. L., & Dugan, R. F. (2011). Exploring the construct validity of academic self-regulation using a new self-report questionnaire - the survey of academic self-regulation. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 45-63. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/edpsych_fac_scholar/1
- Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education,12(3-4), 146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 589-604. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.589
- Berry, S. (2017). Student support networks in online doctoral programs: Exploring nested communities. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 33-48. doi: 10.28945/3676
- Bianchi-Laubsch, D. (2016). The feeling of and desire for sense of community among online graduate students. Journal of Online Doctoral Education 3(1). Retrieved from http://jode.ncu.edu/current/Volume%203%20Issue%201
- Bird, J., & Morgan, C. (2003). Adults contemplating university study at a distance: Issues, themes and concerns. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(1). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v4i1.130
- Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
- Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Cho, M., & Kim, B. J. (2013). Students self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.001
- Chu, R. J. C. (2010). How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults - Analyses of gender and age differences. Computers & Education, 55(1), 255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.011
- de Bruijn-Smolders, M., Timmers, C. F., Gawke, J. C., Schoonman, W., & Born, M. P. (2016). Effective self-regulatory processes in higher education: Research findings and future directions. A systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 139-158. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.915302
- Dunn, K. E., Rakes, G. C., & Rakes, T. A. (2014). Influence of academic self-regulation, critical thinking, and age on online graduate students' academic help-seeking. Distance Education, 35(1), 75-89. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.891426
- Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5( 3), 69-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
- Favor, J. K. (2012). Students' perceptions of long-functioning cooperative teams in acceleratedadult degree programs. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60, 157-164. doi: 10.1080/07377363.2013.722420
- Favor, J. K., & Harvey, M. (2016). We shall not be moved: Adult learners' intransigent attitudes about group projects. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Adult Education Research Conference, Charlotte, NC. Retrieved from http://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2016/papers/18
- Favor, J. K., & Kulp, A. M. (2015). Academic learning teams in accelerated adult programs: Online and on-campus adult students' perceptions. Adult Learning, 20, 1-9. doi: 10.1177/1045159515596928
- Gardner, S. K. (2013). The challenges of first-generation doctoral students. New Directions for Higher Education, 2013(163), 43-54. doi: 10.1002/he.20064
- Holder, B. (2007). An investigation of hope, academics, environment, and motivation as predictors of persistence in higher education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 245-260. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.002
- House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Chicago, IL: Addison-Wesley.
- Ivankova, N., & Stick, S. (2007). Students' persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93-135. doi: 10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
- Jansen, R. S., Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Kester, L., & Kalz, M. (2017). Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29( 1), 6-27. doi: 10.1007/s12528-016-9125-x
- Keith, T. Z. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston: Pearson.
- Kniffin, K. (2007). Accessibility to the PhD and professoriate for first-generation college graduates: Review and implications for students, faculty, and campus policies. American Academic, 3, 49-79.
- Lakey, B., & Cohen, S. (2000). Social support theory and measurement. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 29-52). New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0002
- Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593-618. doi: 10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
- Lee, Y., Choi, J., & Kim, T. (2013). Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44( 2), 328-337. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01306.x
- London, H. (1992). Transformations: Cultural challenges faced by first-generation students.In L. S. Zwerling & H. B. London (Eds.), First-generation students: Confronting thecultural issues: Vol. 30, New Directions for Community Colleges (pp. 5-15). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- London, H. (1996). How college affects first-generation students. About Campus. 1(5). 9-13. doi: 10.1002/abc.6190010503
- Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pyrczak.
- Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. doi: 10.1080/08923648909526659
- National Science Foundation.(2017). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2015. (Special report NSF 17-306). Arlington, VA. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17306/
- Olson, D. A., Liu, J., & Shultz, K. S. (n.d.). The influence of Facebook usage on perceptions of social support, personal efficacy, and life satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Psychology,12(3/4), 133-144. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.www.na-businesspress.com/JOP/OlsonDA_Web12_3__4_.pdf
- Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249-284. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256
- Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual forthe use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching.
- Rakes, G. C., & Dunn, K. E. (2010). The impact of online graduate students' motivation and self-regulation on academic procrastination. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 78-93.
- Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
- Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Spaulding, L. S., & Spaulding, M. T. (2016). Identifying significant integration and institutional factors that predict online doctoral persistence. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.003
- Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195-208. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1
- Shannon, M., Barry, C. M., DeGrace, A., & DiDonato, T. (2016). How parents still help emerging adults get their homework done: The role of self-regulation as a mediator in the relation between parent-child relationship quality and school engagement. Journal of Adult Development, 23(1), 36-44. doi: 10.1007/s10804-015-9219-0
- Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2009). Understanding adult learners' self regulation in online environments: A qualitative study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 36(3), 263-275.
- Terenzini, P., Springer, L., Yaeger, P., Pascarella, E., & Nora, A. (1996). First-generational college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education. 37(1), 1-22. doi: 10.1007/BF01680039
- Tisdell, E. J., Strohschen, G. I. E., Carver, M. L., Corrigan, P., Nash, J., Nelson, M.,... & O'Connor, M. (2004). Cohort learning online in graduate higher education: Constructing knowledge in cyber community. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1), 115-127.
- Toutkoushian, R. K., Stollberg, R. S., & Slaton, K. A. (2018). Talking 'bout my generation: Defining "first-generation college students" in higher education research. Teachers College Record, 120(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1162857
- Verdinelli, S., & Kutner, D. (2016). Persistence factors among online graduate students with disabilities. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(4), 353-368. doi: 10.1037/a0039791
- Wilks, S. E., & Spivey, C. A. (2010). Resilience in undergraduate social work students: Social support and adjustment to academic stress. Social Work Education, 29(3), 276-288. doi: 10.1080/02615470902912243
- Williams, P.E., & Hellman, C.M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education 45(71), 71-82. doi: 10.1023/B:RIHE.0000010047.46814.78
- Zimet, G.D., Dahlem, N.W., Zimet, S.G., & Farley, G.K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1-30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.