Abstracts
Abstract
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have attracted a great deal of interest in recent years as a new learning technology. Since MOOCs inception, only limited research has been carried out to address how learners perceive success in MOOCs after course completion. The aim of this study was to investigate the perceived benefits as the measurement of learning success. Narrative interviews were conducted with 30 Russian-speaking learners who completed at least one MOOC in full. By employing text analysis of interview transcripts, we revealed the authentic voices of participants and gained deeper understanding of learners' perceived benefits based on retrospective reflection. The findings of the study indicate that after finishing MOOCs, learners have received tangible and intangible benefits that in general justified their expectations. University-affiliated students, as well as working professionals, recognized the complementarity of MOOCs, but their assessments were limited to educational tracks. We discovered that taking MOOCs often coincided with the time when an individual was planning to change career, education, or life tracks. The results of the study and their implications are further discussed, together with practical suggestions for MOOC providers.
Keywords:
- online learning,
- massive open online courses,
- MOOCs,
- success,
- perceived benefits,
- qualitative research,
- narrative inquiry
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006
- Azevedo, J., & Marques, M. M. (2017). MOOC success factors: Proposal of an analysis framework. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16, 233-251. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3861
- Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). MOOCs: Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010
- Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.
- Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and patterns in massive open online courses: Review and content analysis of research on MOOCs (2008-2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 118-147. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080
- Brahimi, T., & Sarirete, A. (2015). Learning outside the classroom through MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 601-609. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.013
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into EdX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 15-25. Retrieved from http://www.rpajournal.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SF2.pdf
- Calonge, D., & Shah, M. (2016). MOOCs, graduate skills gaps, and employability: A qualitative systematic review of the literature. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2675
- Chandler, N. (2013). Braced for turbulence: Understanding and managing resistance to change in the higher education sector. Management, 3(5), 243-251.
- Egloffstein, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Employee perspectives on MOOCs for workplace learning. TechTrends 61(1), 65-70. doi: 10.1007/s11528-016-0127-3
- European Commission. (2014). Innovation union competitiveness report 2013. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/competitiveness_report_2013.pdf
- Hammond, C. (2007). Impacts of lifelong learning upon emotional resilience, psychological and mental health: Fieldwork evidence. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 551-568. doi: 10.1080/0305498042000303008
- Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017). Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention-behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), 353-368. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006
- Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
- Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014, January 21). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses in HarvardX and MITx (HarvardX Working Paper No. 1). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2381263
- Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157-168. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
- Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners' contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.019
- Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
- Joksimović, S., Dowell, N., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Graesser, A.C. (2018). Exploring development of social capital in a cMOOC through language and discourse. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.004
- Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133-160. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
- Kahan, T., Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Types of participant behavior in a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 1-18. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087
- Karnouskos, S. (2017). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) as an enabler for competent and innovation in industry. Computers in Industry, 91, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2017.05.001
- Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. International conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170-179). New York, USA: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2460296.2460330
- Kulik, E., & Kidimova, K. (2017). Integrating MOOCs in university curriculum: HSE university experience. Proceedings of EMOOCs 2017: Work in progress papers of the experience and research tracks and position papers of the policy track (pp. 118-127). Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1841/P05_101.pdf
- Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
- Longstaff, E. (2017). How MOOCs can empower learners: A comparison of provider goals and user experiences. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(3), 314-327. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2015.1100715
- Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 92-102. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4236119.v1
- Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2014). Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 197-213. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1855
- Radford, A.W., Robles, J., Cataylo, S., Horn, L., Thornton, J., & Whitfield, K. (2014). The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed methods study of human resource professionals' thinking on MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1842
- Rai, L., & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and general analysis of learner behavior. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(4), 262-268. doi: 10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.697
- Schmid, L., Manturuk, K., Simpkins, I., Goldwasser, M., & Whitfield, K. E. (2015). Fulfilling the promise: Do MOOCs reach the educationally underserved? Educational Media International, 52(2), 116-128. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2015.1053288
- Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Stich, A. E., & Reeves, T. D. (2017). Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States. Internet and Higher Education, 32, 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.001
- Thompson, B. (2016, March). Is adding MOOCs to your CV finally about to pay off? [Blog post]. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/03300766-cb39-11e5-a8ef-ea66e967dd44
- Waard, I., Koutropoulis, A., Keskin, N., Abajian, S., Hogue, R., Rodriguez, C. & Gallagher, M. (2011). Exploring the MOOC format as a pedagogical approach for learning. 10th world conference on mobile and contextual learning. Bejing, China: Mlearn. Retrieved from http://mlearn.bnu.edu.cn/source/ten_outstanding_papers/Exploring%20the%20MOOC%20format%20as%20a%20pedagogical%20approach%20for%20mLearning.pdf
- Watted, A., & Barak, M. (2018). Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants. Internet and Higher Education, 37, 11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001
- Yang, M., Shao, Z., Liu, Q., & Liu, C. (2017). Understanding the quality factors that influence the continuance intention of students toward participation in MOOCs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1195-1214. doi: 10.1007/s11423-017-9513-6
- Zhenghao, C., Alcorn, B., Christensen, G., Eriksson, N., Koller, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2015, September 22). Who's benefiting from MOOCs, and why. [Blog post]. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/09/whos-benefiting-from-moocs-and-why