Abstracts
Abstract
Academic success depends on the comprehension of a language, which is linked to vocabulary learning. Many distance students in South Africa find it difficult to comprehend learning in a language other than their mother tongue. Finding effective strategies for enhancing English vocabulary of university students amidst the spatial, temporal, and pedagogic distance associated with Open Distance Learning (ODL) practices remains a challenge. To address the need for enhancing vocabulary development, mobile application systems (apps) were explored as the best vehicle for the delivery of the vocabulary learning. Mobile learning technologies are ideal in the ODL context because they are flexible, accessible, available, and cater for a myriad of interaction activities. The purpose of the study is to design and implement a mobile-based application aimed at enhancing English vocabulary teaching and learning. Using the Design-Based Research methodology, this study maps the steps taken to develop a vocabulary learning mobile app named VocUp; it describes the architecture, user interface, features of VocUp, and advocates for contextually-conscious and learning-driven app development.
Keywords:
- mobile apps,
- vocabulary teaching and learning,
- android app development,
- design-based research
Appendices
Bibliography
- Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 1-17. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
- Cole, M. (2003). Vygotsky and context. Where did the connection come from and what difference does it make? Istanbul: International Society for Theoretical Psychology. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/People/MCole/lsvcontext.html
- Colpaert, J. (2004). From courseware to coursewear? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3-4), 261-266. doi: 10.1080/0958822042000319575
- De Groot, A. (2006). Effects of stimulus characteristics and background music on foreign language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 56(3), 463-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00374.x
- Ender, A. (2014). Implicit and explicit cognitive processes in incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 536-560. doi: 10.1093/applin/amu051
- Feldman, K., & Kinsella, K. (2005). Narrowing the language gap: The case for explicit vocabulary instruction. Scholastic. Retrieved from http://teacher.scholastic.com/products/authors/pdfs/Narrowing_the_Gap.pdf
- Folse, K. (2010). Is explicit vocabulary focus the reading teacher's job? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 139-160. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ887885.pdf
- Furneaux, C. (1999). Recent materials on teaching writing. ELT Journal, 53(1), 56-61. doi: 10.1093/elt/53.1.56
- Garrison, D. R. (1985). Three generations of technological innovations in distance education. Distance Education, 6(2), 235-241. doi: 10.1080/0158791850060208
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2-11.
- Joorabchi, M. E., Mesbah, A., & Kruchten, P. (2013, October). Real challenges in mobile app development. In The ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (pp. 15-24). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ESEM.2013.9
- Keegan, D. (2005, October). The incorporation of mobile learning into mainstream education and training. In Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on m-Learning, Cape Town, (pp. 25-28).
- Kolmos, A. (2015, July). Design-based research: Issues in connecting theory, research and practice. In Research in Engineering Education Symposium (pp. 13-15). Aungier St.: Dublin Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/designbased-research--issues-in-connecting-theory-research-and-practice(d4a34757-95ba-4801-90e9-34468a56a844).html
- Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157-165. 10.1017/S0958344009000202
- Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Heinle.
- Laufer, B., & Yano, Y. (2001). Understanding unfamiliar words in a text: Do L2 learners understand how much they don't understand? Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(2), 549-566.
- Makoe, M. (2010). Exploring the use of MXit: A cell‐phone social network to facilitate learning in distance education. Open Learning, 25(3), 251-257. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2010.512099
- McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2013). Educational design research. In M. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bischop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications & technology. London: Springer.
- Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). Routledge: London.
- Nation, P. (2002). Best Practice in Vocabulary Teaching and Learning. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, (pp. 267-272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667190.037
- Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, 14, 6-19. Retrieved from http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam031/97042211.pdf
- Oxford, R. L., & Scarcella, R. C. (1994). Second language vocabulary learning among adults: State of the art in vocabulary instruction. System, 22(2), 231-243. doi: 10.1016/0346-251X(94)90059-0
- Pandey, K., & Singh, N. (2015). Mobile learning: Critical pedagogy to education for all. In Y. Zhang (Ed.), Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning, (pp. 107-132). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_6
- Parsons, D., Ryu, H., & Cranshaw, M. (2007). A design requirements framework for mobile learning environments. Journal of Computers, 2(4), 96-100. doi: 10.4304/jcp.2.4.1-8
- Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39-56. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00096
- Sarrab, M., Elbasir, M., & Alnaeli, S. (2016). Towards a quality model of technical aspects for mobile learning services: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.003
- Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88. doi: 10.1177/026553220101800103
- Shezi, L. (2016, April 29). SA's 26.8 million internet users spend almost three hours a day on social media. HXT. Retrieved from http://www.htxt.co.za/2016/04/29/the-stuff-south-africa-26-8-mil-internet-users-spend-most-their-time-doing-online/
- Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95-110.
- Sweeney, P., & Moore, C. (2012). Mobile apps for learning vocabulary: Categories, evaluation and design criteria for teachers and developers. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 2(4), 1-16. doi: 10.4018/ijcallt.2012100101
- Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2002). M-learning in transit. In P. Lewis (Ed.), The changing face of CALL (pp. 229-243). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
- Traxler, J. (2009). Current state of mLearning. In M. Ally (Ed.), mLearning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 9-24). Edmonton, Alberta: Athabasca University Press.
- Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 121-140. doi: 10.2307/3587978