Abstracts
Abstract
In this research paper, the authors analyse the collected data output during a 36 week cMOOC. Six-week data streams from blogs, Twitter, a Facebook group, and video conferences were tracked from the daily newsletter and the MOOCs’ hashtag (#Change 11). This data was analysed using content analysis and social network analysis within an interpretative research paradigm. The content analysis was used to examine the technology learners used to support their learning while the social network analysis focused on the participant in different spaces and their participation patterns in connectivist learning. The findings from this research include: 1) A variety of technologies were used by learners to support their learning in this course; 2) Four types of participation patterns were reveled, including unconnected floaters, connected lurkers, connected participants, and active contributors. The participation of learners displays the participation inequality typical of social media, but the ratio of active contributors is much higher than xMOOCs; 3) There were five basic structures of social networks formed in the learning; and 4) The interaction around topics and topic generation supports the idea of learning as network creation after the analysis of participation patterns that are based on some deep interactive topic. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the behaviors of learners in a cMOOC in an open and distributed online environment, so that future MOOCs designers and facilitators can understand, design and facilitate more effective MOOCs for learners.
Keywords:
- participation pattern,
- cMOOCs,
- social network analysis,
- connectivist learning,
- connectivism,
- interaction
Appendices
Bibliography
- Arnold, P., Kumar, S., Thillosen, A., & Ebner, M. (2014) Offering cMOOCs collaboratively: The COER13 experience from the convenor's perspective, In U. Cress, & C. D. Kloos (Eds.), Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014 (pp. 184-188). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anja_Lorenz/publication/263543544_Open_Online_Courses_in_the_context_of_higher_education_an_evaluation_of_a_German_cMOOC/links/54941c560cf2e1b6095f97bc.pdf
- Bonsignore, E. M., Dunne, C., Rotman, D., Smith, M., Capone, T., Hansen, D. L., & Shneiderman, B. (2009, August). First steps to NetViz Nirvana: Evaluating social network analysis with NodeXL. In CSE '09: International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (Canada), Vancouver (pp. 332-339). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.
- Bozkurt, A., Honeychurch, S., Caines, A., Maha, B., Koutropoulos, A., & Cormier, D. (2016). Community tracking in a cMOOC and nomadic learner behavior identification on a connectivist rhizomatic learning network. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(4). Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/tojde/article/view/5000204512
- Clow, D. (2013, April). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 185-189). Leuven, Belgium; New York: ACM.
- Crosslin, M., & Dellinger, J. (2015). Lessons learned while designing and implementing a multiple pathways xMOOC + cMOOC. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 250-255). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/viewArticle/2012-18/html
- Downes, S. (2007). Learning networks in practice. Emerging Technologies for Learning, 2, 19-27. Retrieved from http://ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029-044Downes.pdf
- Downes, S. (2011a). Moving beyond self-directed learning: Network-directed learning [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/post/55361
- Downes, S (2011b). MOOC statistics thus far [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2011/11/mooc-statistics-thus-far.html
- Downes, S. (2012a). Massively open online courses are 'here to stay'[Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/post/58676
- Downes, S. (2012b). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks [PDF]. National Research Council Canada. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.Pdf
- Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). From massive access to cooperation: lessons learned and proven results of a hybrid xMOOC/cMOOC pedagogical approach to MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1-13.
- Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/643/1402Continued
- Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Durand, G. (2014). Challenges to research in MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1-15.
- Guanawardena, C. N., Lowe, X., Constance, A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
- Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology 47(2), 320-341.
- Hill, P. (2013). The four student archetypes emerging in MOOCs [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://mfeldstein.com/the-four-student-archetypes-emerging-in-moocs/
- Kop, R. (2010, June). The design and development of a personal learning environment: Researching the learning experience. Paper H4 32 presented at the European Distance and E-learning Network Annual Conference 2010, Valencia, Spain.
- Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19-38. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/882/1689
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social - an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lee, J. (2012). Patterns of interaction and participation in a large online course: Strategies for fostering sustainable discussion. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 260-272.
- Levy, D. (2011). Lessons learned from participating in a connectivist massive online open course (MOOC). In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, & Y. Yair, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2011: Learning in the technological era (pp. 31-36). The Open University of Israel, Raanana. Retrieved from http://www.openu.ac.il/research_center/chais2011/download/f-levyd-94_eng.pdf
- Li, S., Tang, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2016). A case study on learning difficulties and corresponding supports for learning in cMOOCs. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(2). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1100651
- Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 (pp. 266-275). University of Lancaster, Lancaster.
- McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf
- Merceron, A., Blikstein, P., & Siemens, G. (2016). Learning analytics: From big data to meaningful data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(3), 4-8.
- Mika, P. (2007). Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Web Semantics: science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(1), 5-15.
- Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(2), 149-159.
- Nielsen, J. (2006). Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality
- Ostashewski, N., Howell, J., & Dron, J. (2016). Crowdsourcing MOOC interactions: Using a social media site cMOOC to engage students in university course activities [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/2528/PDF?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
- Riel, J. & Lawless, K. A. (2017). Developments in MOOC technologies and participation since 2012: Changes since "The year of the MOOC." In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (4th ed.), Hershey, PA: IGI Global, Forthcoming.
- Rodriguez, C. O. (2013). Two distinct course formats in the delivery of connectivist MOOCs. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 66-80.
- Saadatmand, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2014). Participants' perceptions of learning and networking in connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 16-30.
- Siemens, G. (2005a). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
- Siemens, G. (2005b). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm
- Siemens, G. (2009). What Is Connectivism [Google docs]. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/14pKVP0_ILdPty6MGMJW8eQVEY1zibZ0RpQ2C0cePIgc/edit?pli=1
- Siemens, G. (2011a). This will be fun: Mother of all MOOCs [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2011/05/19/this-will-be-fun-mother-of-all-moocs/
- Siemens, G. (2011b). Networked-directed learning [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/index.php?title=Networked-Directed_Learning&oldid=49706
- Siemens, G. (2011c). Orientation: Sensemaking and wayfinding in complex distributed online information environments (Doctoral dissertation). University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
- Siemens, G. (2012). MOOCs are really a platform [Blog post]. eLearnspace. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/
- Siemens, G. (2013). Massive open online courses: Innovation in education? [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/pub_PS_OER-IRP_CH1.pdf
- Siemens, G. (2014). Multiple pathways: Blending xMOOCs & cMOOCs [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2014/05/06/multiple-pathways-blending-xmoocs-cmoocs/
- Skrypnyk, O., Joksimović, S. K., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2170/3347
- Smith, B., & Eng M. (2013, August). MOOCs: A learning journey. In International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Continuing Education (pp. 244-255). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-39750-9_23#citeas.
- Wang, Z. J., Chen L., & Zhen Q., H. (2014). The development track of MOOCs and three forms of practice. China Educational Technology, 7, 25-33.
- Wang, Z. J., Chen L., & Anderson T. (2014). A Framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 121-141. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1709/2838
- Wang, Z. J., & Chen L. (2015). Theory framework building of instructional interaction in connectivist learning context. Open Education Research, 21(5), 25-34.
- Wang, Z. J., Anderson, T., Chen, L., & Barbera, E. (2017), Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 683-699. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.12433/abstract
- Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94-104.