Abstracts
Abstract
This paper is a condensed version of a study entitled “Beyond 18: Leaving Child Care Institutions — A Study of Aftercare Practices in Five States of India”, conducted and published in 2019 by Udayan Care, a charitable organisation, with support from UNICEF India and Tata Trusts. This research involved the participation of care leavers, government functionaries, duty-bearers, and civil society practitioners. It found that upon turning 18, youth transitioning out of child care institutions to independent life in India experience many challenges, such as securing housing and identity documents; accessing education, skill development, and employment opportunities; and garnering psychosocial support. This study also showed that absent or inadequate aftercare support during transition increases care leavers’ vulnerabilities to homelessness, unemployment, substance misuse, and ruptured social relationships. It also found that continued aftercare support is necessary to foster independent living skills in these young people and enable their reintegration into mainstream society. While exploring the continuum from child care to aftercare, the researchers developed the concept of a “Sphere of Aftercare”, comprising eight domains of support that are considered essential for a successful transition. The study revealed a lack of transition planning at the level of child care institutions and functionaries and a general lack of understanding of the holistic aftercare needs of youth throughout the eight identified domains. The study also found an absence of clarity about stakeholders’ roles; a lack of data management with regard to the number of youth leaving care, leading to inadequate budget planning; and a lack of adequate monitoring mechanisms to assess care leavers’ outcomes. In light of this study’s findings, policy reforms and ways of developing robust aftercare programmes are recommended in relation to policy, practice, and law.
Keywords:
- aftercare,
- care leaver,
- India,
- transition,
- youth
Appendices
Bibliography
- Akister, J., Owens, M., & Goodyer, I. M. (2010). Leaving care and mental health: Outcomes for children in out-of-home care during the transition to adulthood. Health Research Policy and Systems, 8, article 10. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-8-10
- Andrea, N. (2018). Insights into structurally identical experiences of residential care alumni: The paradox of becoming autonomous in a residential care facility. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 9(2): 61–85. doi:10.18357/ijcyfs92201818213
- Atluri, N., Pogula, M., Chandrashekar, R., & Gupta Ariely, S. (2018). Mental and emotional health needs of orphaned and separated youth in New Delhi, India during transition into adulthood. Institutionalised Children Explorations and Beyond, 5(2),188–207. doi:10.1177/2349301120180208
- Barn, R. (2010). Care leavers and social capital: Understanding and negotiating racial and ethnic identity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(5), 832–850. doi:10.1080/01419870903318896
- Barth, R. P. (1990). On their own: The experiences of youth after foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 7(5), 419–440. doi:10.1007/BF00756380
- Bhargava, R., Chandrashekhar, R., Kansal, S., & Modi, K. (2018). Young adults transitioning from institutional care to independent living: The role of aftercare support and services. Institutionalised Children Explorations and Beyond, 5(2), 168–187. doi:10.1177/2349301120180207
- Browne, E. (2017). Children in care institutions [K4D Helpdesk report]. Institute of Development Studies. https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/children-in-care-institutions/
- Center for Evidence-Based Management. (2014). Critical appraisal checklist for cross-sectional study [Resource document]. https://cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Critical-Appraisal-Questions-for-a-Cross-Sectional-Study-July-2014-1.pdf
- Dabir, N., Rego, A., & Kapadia, K. (2011). Rainbow homes: Sunbursts in the lives of vulnerable girls. Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
- Doucet, M. (2018). Relationships matter for youth ‘aging out’ of care [Research report]. McGill University School of Social Work. https://rcybc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/relationships_matter_research_report_fall_2018_final_0.pdf
- Dutta, S. (2017). Life after leaving care: Experiences of young Indian girls. Children and Youth Services Review, 73, 266–273. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.12.022
- Everson-Hock, E. S., Jones, R., Guillaume, L., Clapton, J., Duenas, A., Goyder, E., Chilcott, J., Cooke, J., Payne, N., Sheppard, L, M., & Swann, C. (2011). Supporting the transition of looked-after young people to independent living: A systematic review of interventions and adult outcomes. Child: Care, Health and Development, 37(6), 767–779. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01287.x
- Fritz, C., & van Knippenberg, D. (2017). Gender and leadership aspiration: The impact of work–life initiatives. Human Resource Management, 57(4), 855–868. doi:10.1002/hrm.21875
- Gunnar, M. R., Bruce, J., & Grotevant, H. D. (2000). International adoption of institutionally reared children: Research and policy. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), 677–693. doi:10.1017/s0954579400004077
- Gutterswijk, R. V., Kuiper, C. H. Z.., Lautan, N., Kunst, E. G., van der Horst, F. C. P., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Prinzie, P. (2020). The outcome of non-residential youth care compared to residential youth care: A multilevel meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review. 113, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104950
- Häggman-Laitila, A., Salokekkilä, P., & Karki, S. 2019. Young people’s preparedness for adult life and coping after foster care: A systematic review of perceptions and experiences in the transition period. Child Youth Care Forum, 48, 633–661. doi:10.1007/s10566-019-09499-4
- Juvenile Justice (Care And Protection Of Children) Act (2015). The Gazette Of India. http://cara.nic.in/PDF/JJ%20act%202015.pdf
- Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Model Rules (2016). The Gazette Of India. http://cara.nic.in/PDF/english%20model%20rule.pdf
- Karandikar, P., & Charegaonkar, A. (2019). Aftercare for young adult orphans [Reinventing India: PIC policy paper #13]. Pune International Centre. https://puneinternationalcentre.org/publication/aftercare-young-adult-orphans/
- Legal Center for Foster Care and Education. (2008). Questions and answers: Credit transfer and school completion. American Bar Association and Casey Family Programs. https://web.archive.org/web/20170827082931/https:/www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/child/education/QA_2_Credits_FINAL.authcheckdam.pdf
- Mares, A. S., & Jordan, M. (2012). Federal aftercare programs for transition-aged youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(8), 1509–1518. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.04.007
- Meade, S., & Mendes, P. (2014). Interim evaluation report for the Berry Street pilot program ‘Stand By Me’. Berry Street. https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/pacra/interim-evaluation-report-berry-street-pilot-program-stand-me
- Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship. (2015). National Policy on Skill Development and Entrepreneurship 2015. https://www.msde.gov.in/reports-documents/policies/national-policy-skill-development-and-entrepreneurship-2015
- Ministry of Women and Child Development. (2013). The National Policy for Children, 2013. The Gazette of India. https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/npcenglish08072013_0.pdf
- Ministry of Women and Child Development. (2014). Revised integrated child protection scheme (CPS): A centrally sponsored scheme of government –civil society partnership. https://cdn.s3waas.gov.in/s32a79ea27c279e471f4d180b08d62b00a/uploads/2018/03/2018031348.pdf
- Ministry of Women and Child Development. (2016). National Plan of Action for Children 2016. https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/National%20Plan%20of%20Action%202016.pdf
- Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports. (2014). National Youth Policy 2014. https://yas.nic.in/sites/default/files/National-Youth-Policy-Document.pdf
- Modi, K., Anbalagan, E., Shroff, R., & Singhal, N. (2018). Improving child care in India through the development of the Questionnaire to Assess Needs of Children in Care (QANCC). Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care, 17(2), 1–25.
- Modi, K., Nayar-Akhtar, M., Ariely, S., & Gupta, D. (2016). Addressing challenges of transition from children’s home to independence: Udayan Care’s Udayan Ghars (Sunshine Children’s Homes) & aftercare programme. Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care, 15(1), 87–101.
- Montgomery, P., Donkoh, C., & Underhill, K. (2006). Independent living programs for young people leaving the care system: The state of the evidence. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(12), 1435–1448. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.03.002
- Mori, S., Nishizawa, S., & Kimura, A. (2018). Reconsidering recent developments in Japanese residential care and the road to FICE Japan. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies. 9(1), 121–131. doi:10.18357/ijcyfs91201818123
- Murray, S., & Goddard, J. (2014). Life after growing up in care: Informing policy and practice through research. Australian Social Work, 67(1), 102–117. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2013.868010?journalCode=rasw20
- Rutman, D., & Hubberstey, C. (2016). Is anybody there? Informal supports accessed and sought by youth from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 63, 21–27. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.02.007
- Udayan Care. (2017). Standards of care in child care institutions. Udayan Care & UNICEF. https://www.udayancare.org/sites/default/files/Standards_of_Care.pdf
- Stein, M. 2012. Young people leaving care: Supporting pathways to adulthood. Jessica Kingsley.
- Storli, R., & Hansen Sandseter, E. B. (2019). Children’s play, well-being and involvement: How children play indoors and outdoors in Norwegian early childhood education and care institutions. International Journal of Play, 8(1), 65–78. doi:10.1080/21594937.2019.1580338
- Torrico, R. (2010). Youth aging out of foster care: Supporting their transition into adulthood. Children, Youth & Families Practice Update, July, 1–5. https://www.socialworkers.org/assets/secured/documents/practice/children/children_families_practice_update7-2010.pdf
- Trout, A. L., Hoffman, S., Huscroft-D’Angelo, J., Epstein, M. H., Duppong Hurley, K., & Stevens, A. L. (2014). Youth and parent perceptions of aftercare supports at discharge from residential care. Child and Family Social Work, 19(3), 304–311. doi:10.1111/cfs.12003
- Trout, A. L., Chmelka, M. B., Thompson, R. W., Epstein, M. H., Tyler, P., & Pick, R. (2010). The departure status of youth from residential group care: Implications for aftercare. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(1), 67–78. doi:10.1007/s10826-009-9283-9
- Udayan Care. (2019). Beyond 18: Leaving child care institutions — A study of aftercare practices in five States of India. Tata Trusts, Udayan Care, & UNICEF. https://www.udayancare.org/research-and-publication/research-studies-and-papers
- United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Treaty Series, 1577, 3. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text
- United Nations General Assembly resolution 64/142 (UNGACC). (2009). Guidelines for the alternative care of children. https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/64/142
- United Nations World Youth Report. (2020). Youth and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://www.un.org/development/desa/youth/world-youth-report/wyr2018.html
- Vacca, J. S. (2008). Foster children need more help after they reach the age of eighteen. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(5), 485–492. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.11.007
- Valset, K. (2018). Investigating the link between school performance, aftercare and educational outcome among youth ageing out of foster care: A Norwegian nationwide longitudinal cohort study. Nordic Social Work Research, 8(1), 79–93. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2018.1457557
- Villagrana, M., Guillen, C., Macedo, V., & Lee, S. Y. (2017). Perceived self-stigma in the utilization of mental health services in foster care and post foster care among foster care alumni. Children and Youth Services Review, 85, 26–34. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.040