Abstracts
Abstract
Informed by the sociology of knowledge, this paper understands buildings as “material objectivations” that continuously “act back” upon their users. It examines the following question: Why are the discussions about constructing new (religious) landmark buildings, or the rebuilding of historical ones, so emotionally charged? Using the debate about a proposed golden cross on top of the reconstruction of the Prussian City Palace in Berlin as a starting point, this article studies buildings on two levels: the level of bodily experience, on which they unfold their seductive features, and the level of – often conflicting – symbolic inscription. The analysis shows that religious landmark buildings, such as churches or mosques, use specific means of expression to stimulate the experience of the “numinous.” As a result, they are often loaded with strong emotions and feelings of belonging or dis-belonging. As religious communities increasingly become fragmented in diverse societies, symbolic recognition in landmark projects appears to be a deeply political concern.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann (1967 [1966]). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Press.
- Cencus Database (2011). https://ergebnisse.zensus2011.de/. Accessed September 26, 2017.
- De Botton, A. (2006). The Architecture of Happiness. London: Penguin Books.
- Delanty, G. and P. R. Jones (2002). “European Identity and Architecture.” European Journal of Social Theory 5(4): 453-466.
- Fokus Online (2017). “Hierarchie der Religionen? Buschkowsky schaltet sich in Berliner Kuppelkreuz-Kampf ein,” Fokus Online. Without date. http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/stadtschloss-hierarchie-der-religionen-buschkowsky-schaltet-sich-in-berliner-kuppelkreuz-kampf-ein_id_7177192.html. Accessed May 29, 2017.
- Habermalz, C. (2017). “Der Tanz ums goldene Kreuz,” Deutschlandfunk, June 6, 2017. http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/berlin-der-tanz-ums-goldene-kreuz.886.de.html?dram:article_id=387963. Accessed September 26, 2017.
- Hennet, A.-I. (2007). “Die Berliner Schlossplatzdebatte – die Geschichte einer Identitätssuche,” in: Schug, A. (Ed.). Palast der Republik: Politischer Diskurs und private Erinnerung. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag, p. 54-66.
- Jones, P. R. (2006). “The Sociology of Architecture and the Politics of Building: The discursive construction of Ground Zero.” Sociology 40(3): 549-565.
- Otto, R. (1936 [1917]). The Idea of the Holy. An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational. London, Oxford University Press.
- Otto, R. (2013 [1917]). Das Heilige: Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen. München, C.H. Beck.
- rbb (2017). “Grütters verteidigt geplantes Kreuz auf dem Humboldt-Forum,” Rundfunk Berlin Brandenburg, May 20, 2017. https://www.rbb-online.de/kultur/beitrag/2017/05/diskussion-um-kuppelkreuz-auf-humboldt-forum.htm/listall=on/print=true.html. Accessed May 29, 2017.
- Steets, S. (2015). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der gebauten Welt: Eine Architektursoziologie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
- Steets, S. (2016). “Taking Berger and Luckmann to the Realm of Materiality: Architecture as a Social Construction.” Cultural Sociology 10(1): 93-108.
- Stiftung Zukunft Berlin (2017). “Schlosskuppel: bitte ohne Kreuz! ,” Press release, May 18, 2017. http://stiftungzukunftberlin.eu/fileadmin/szb/daten/Stiftung/Pressemitteilungen/17_05_18_SZB-Pressemitteilung_Schlosskuppel_ohne_Kreuz.pdf. Accessed September 26, 2017.
- Wohlrab-Sahr, M., U. Karstein and T. Schmidt-Lux (2009). Forcierte Säkularität: Religiöser Wandel und Generationendynamik im Osten Deutschlands. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus.
- Woodhead, L. (2016). “The Rise of ‘no religion’ in Britain: The emergence of a new cultural majority.” Journal of the British Academy 4: 245-261.