In this era of reconciliation and unprecedented challenges – exemplified by the 2015 landmark report and recommendations from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Canada (Niezen 2013; TRCC 2015); the Aborigines’ shared effort with Parks Australia to close Uluru to tourism in 2019 (Everingham, Peters, and Higgins-Desbiolles 2021); the current COVID-19 global pandemic that has caused comparable crises in Indigenous communities, such as the Diné (Navajo) in the U.S. and the Yanomami in Brazil, and non-Indigenous communities worldwide (see, among others, Smith L. 2021; Wang 2021); and the decades-long threats that fossil fuel extraction and development have posed to indigenous health and land rights in places such as Ecuador and Alaska (see, among others, Berry 1975; Coates 1991; Coyne and Hopfinger 2011; Herrmann 2019; Postero and Tockman 2020) –,indigenous approaches to government, community social programs, and economic development have necessarily taken forms that blend cultural continuation with strategic or forced alteration. Notwithstanding common opportunities available to and challenges facing all Indigenous peoples globally, the idiosyncratic history of each Indigenous community and the particular social, political, and economic contexts in which these are set have allowed for the customization and periodic revising of governance and development practices. Such a notion of uniqueness in a local setting has been pushed further by scholars like Benjamin Gregg (2020), who went as far as questioning the applicability of the term indigenous on a broad, international scale – thus also doubting the efficacy of umbrella instruments such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (United Nations 2007). Rather, Gregg envisioned the state, with its corresponding policy instrument the “indigenous rights state” (2020, 106 and segg.), as the only legal and political context within which indigenous rights, which are always internal and never international, can be constitutionally recognized according to the kind of state and the unique history and status of the local Indigenous peoples. Gregg’s perspective challenges the more established view that sees Indigenous peoples and indigeneity as valuable, if not necessary, actors in a decolonized international arena (see, among others, Lightfoot 2016; Sarson 2019; Simpson 2014; Tucker 2013). Setting semantics aside, contemporary indigenous cultures and practices of self-governance stem from and, at the same time, intersect with various aspects of indigenous experiences that include identity (see, among many, Alfred 2009; Poliandri 2011), the retention and change of customary leadership and traditional political practices (see, among many, Hania and Graben 2019; Nas, Nurlinah, and Haryanto 2019), economic development (see, among many, Hotte et al. 2018), relations with state governments, international political bodies, and corporate entities (see, among many, Chase 2019; Shadian 2017, 2018), sustainability and resource conservation (see, among many, Artelle et al. 2019; Diver et al. 2019; Lee et al. 2019), Indigenous nationhood and nation-building (see, among many, Cornell 2015; Poliandri 2016; Seelau and Seelau 2014), migration, and activism, in no particular order of importance when considered on a general basis. These dynamics, which have developed as reactions to and/or in collaboration with non-Indigenous international, national, regional, and local political bodies, have often affected or altered the social and cultural contexts and daily experiences of Indigenous community members. At the same time, the unique prioritization of such order by specific Indigenous communities, whether within the borders of a modern state or across multiple states, and, by result, their tailored approach to governance become then critical when considering individual cases in specific socio-geographic and political contexts. Keeping the political aspect of these processes as a backdrop, this special issue of Ethnologies offers a collection of case studies that address several of these aspects of indigenous experience, exploring …
Appendices
References
- Alfred, Gerald R. (Taiaiake). 2009. First Nation Perspectives on Political Identity. First Nation Citizenship Research and Policy Series, Building Towards Change. Ottawa: Assembly of First Nations.
- Aliye, Abdurahman Abdulahi. 2020. “African Indigenous Leadership Philosophy and Democratic Governance System: Gada’s Intersectionality with Ubuntu.” Journal of Black Studies 51(7): 727-759.
- Artelle, Kyle A. et al. 2019. “Supporting Resurgent Indigenous-Led Governance: A Nascent Mechanism for Just and Effective Conservation.” Biological Conservation 240: 108284.
- Berry, Mary C. 1975. The Alaska Pipeline: The Politics of Oil and Native Land Claims. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Borraz, Fernando. 2005. “Assessing the Impact of Remittances on Schooling: The Mexican Experience.” Global Economy Journal 5(1): 1850033.
- Chase, Veronika Miranda. 2019. “The Changing Face of Environmental Governance in the Brazilian Amazon: Indigenous and Traditional Peoples Promoting Norm Diffusion.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 62(2): e0008.
- Coates, Peter A. 1991. The Trans-Alaska Pipeline Controversy: Technology, Conservation, and the Frontier. Bethlehem: Leigh University Press.
- Conway, Dennis, and Jeffrey H. Cohen. 2008. “Consequences of Migration and Remittances for Mexican Transnational Communities.” Economic Geography 74(1): 26-44.
- Cornell, Stephen. 2015. “Processes of Native Nationhood: The Indigenous Politics of Self-Government.” The International Indigenous Policy Journal 6(4), on line: https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/iipj/article/view/7475/6119.
- Cornell, Stephen, and Miriam Jorgensen. 2019. “What are the Limits of Social Inclusion? Indigenous Peoples and Indigenous Governance in Canada and the United States.” American Review of Canadian Studies 49(2): 283-300.
- Coyne, Amanda, and Tony Hopfinger. 1991. Crude Awakening: Money, Mavericks, and Mayhem in Alaska. New York: Nation Books.
- Diver, Sibyl, Daniel Ahrens, Talia Arbit and Karen Bakker. 2019. “Engaging Colonial Entanglements: ‘Treatment as a State’ Policy for Indigenous Water Co-Governance.” Global Environmental Politics 19(3): 33-56.
- Everingham, Phoebe, Andrew Peters and Freya Higgins-Desbiolles. 2021. “The (Im)possibilities of Doing Tourism Otherwise: The Case of Settler Colonial Australia and the Closure of the Climb at Uluru.” Annals of Tourism Research 88: 103178.
- Garcia Zamora, Rodolfo. 2020. “Remittances from Mexican Migrants in the United States During the Time of COVID-19.” Remittances Review 5(2): 143-153.
- Gregg, Benjamin. 2020. “The Indigenous Rights State.” Ratio Juris 33(1): 98-116.
- Hania, Patricia, and Sari Graben. 2019. “Stories and the Participation of Indigenous Women in Natural Resource Governance.” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 32(2): 310-340.
- Hanrahan, Maura. 2016. “Making Indigenous Culture the Foundation of Indigenous Governance Today: The Mi’kmaq Rights Initiative of Nova Scotia, Canada.” Native American/Indigenous Studies 3(1): 75-95.
- Hendrix Burke A. et al. 2020. “Building Capacity in Indigenous Governance: Comparing the Australian and American Experiences.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 79(1): 26-40.
- Herrmann, Victoria. 2019. “The Birth of Petroleum Path Dependence: Oil Narratives and Development in the North.” American Review of Canadian Studies 49(2): 301-331.
- Hotte, Ngaio, Harry Nelson, Tim Hawkins, Stephen Wyatt, and Robert Kozak. 2018. “Maintaining Accountability Between Levels of Governance in Indigenous Economic Development: Examples from British Columbia, Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 61(4): 523-549.
- International Labour Organization. 1989. Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, C169. Geneva: International Labour Office.
- Lee, Lynn Chi, et al. 2019. “Drawing on Indigenous Governance and Stewardship to Build Resilient Coastal Fisheries: People and Abalone Along Canada’s Northwest Coast.” Marine Policy 109: 103701.
- Lianes, Fatima. 2021. “By the People.” Video, 26:07. On line: https://www.aljazeera.com/program/democracy-maybe/2021/11/24/by-the-people. Accessed November 29, 2021.
- Lightfoot, Sheryl R. 2016. Global Indigenous Politics: A Subtle Revolution. London: Routledge.
- Llano, Fernando. 2022. “In Pictures: The Indigenous Town in Mexico Living on Remittances.” Al Jazeera, 27 January, on line: https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2022/1/27/in-pictures-indigenous-town-in-mexico-survives-on-remittances.
- McKivett, Andrea et al. 2021. “The Role of Governance in Indigenous Medical Education Research.” Rural and Remote Health 21(2): 6473.
- Nas, Jayadi, Nurlinah, and Haryanto. 2019. “Indigenous Village Governance: Lessons from Indonesia.” Public Administration Issue 6 (Special Issue II, electronic edition): 94-104.
- Niezen, Ronald. 2013. Truth and Indignation: Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian Residential Schools. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Nikolakis, William, and Harry Nelson. 2019. “Trust, Institutions, and Indigenous Self-governance: An Exploratory Study.” Governance 32: 331-347.
- Norman, Heidi, Mehal Krayem, Cale Bain, and Therese Apolonio. 2020. “Are Aboriginal People a Threat to the Modern Nation? A Study of Newsprint Coverage of a Racial Discrimination Complaint.” Australian Aboriginal Studies 1: 18-35.
- Poliandri, Simone. 2011. First Nations, Identity, and Reserve Life: The Mi’kmaq of Nova Scotia. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
- Poliandri, Simone. (ed.). 2016. Native American Nationalism and Nation Re-building: Past and Present Cases. Albany: SUNY Press.
- Postero, Nancy, and Jason Tockman. 2020. “Self-Governance in Bolivia’s First Indigenous Autonomy: Charagua.” Latin American Research Review 55(1): 1-15.
- Ramirez, Reyna. 2007. Native Hubs: Culture, Community, and Belonging in Silicon Valley and Beyond. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Riley, Angela R. 2007. “Good (Native) Governance.” Columbia Law Review 107(5): 1049-1125.
- Sarson, Leah. 2019. “You Cannot Trade What Is Not Yours”: Indigenous Governance and the NAFTA Negotiations. American Review of Canadian Studies 49(2): 332-347.
- Seelau, Laura M. and Ryan Seelau. 2104. “Making Indigenous Self-Determination Work: What the Nation Building Principles and Three Case Studies from Chile Teach Us About Implementing Indigenous Human Rights.” American Indian Law Review 39(1): 137-199. On line: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr/vol39/iss1/3.
- Shadian, Jessica M. 2017. “Reimagining Political Space: The Limits of Arctic Indigenous Self-Determination in International Governance?” In Governing Arctic Change, edited by Kathrin Keil and Sebastian Knecht, 43-57. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Shadian, Jessica M. 2018. “Navigating Political Borders Old and New: The Territoriality of Indigenous Inuit Governance.” Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33(2): 273-288.
- Simpson, Audra. 2014. Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life across the Borders of Settler States. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Smith, Dean Howard. 1994a. “The Issue of Compatibility between Cultural Integrity and Economic Development among Native American Tribes.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 18(2): 177-205.
- Smith, Dean Howard. 1994b. “Native American Economic Development: A Modern Approach.” Review of Regional Studies 24(1): 87-102.
- Smith, Dean Howard. 2000. Modern Tribal Development: Paths to Self-Sufficiency and Cultural Integrity in Indian Country. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
- Smith, Libby. 2021. “Impact of the Coronavirus and Federal Responses on Indigenous Peoples’ Health, Security and Sovereignty.” American Indian Law Review 45(2): 297-326.
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRCC). 2015. Honouring the Truth: Reconciling for the Future Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. On line: https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf.
- Tucker, Kathryn. 2013. “Reconciling Aboriginal Rights with International Trade Agreements: Hupacasath First Nation v. Canada.” McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy 9(2): 109-129.
- United Nations. 2007. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Adopted 13 Sept. 2007. GA Res. 61/295. UN GAOR, 61st Sess. UN Doc. A/RES/61/295.
- von der Porten, Suzanne, and Rob De Loë. 2013. “Water Governance and Indigenous Governance: Towards a Synthesis.” Indigenous Policy Journal 23(4): 1-12.
- Wang, Haoying. 2021. Why the Navajo Nation was Hit So Hard by Coronavirus: Understanding the Disproportionate Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Applied Geography 134: 102526.