Abstracts
Abstract
Objective – In this study, we investigated the utilization of crowdsourcing practices among academic librarians in Nigeria, encompassing all 36 states across the 6 geopolitical zones of the country.
Methods – We employed the descriptive survey design. The target population consisted of academic librarians who were members of the national professional online group of the association known as the NLA where scholars shared professional thoughts and advancements.
Results – The findings revealed a high level of awareness about crowdsourcing among academic librarians, with their experiences spanning various areas such as knowledge discovery and management (RII = 0.76), broadcast search (RII = 0.63), the distribution of human intelligence tasking (RII = 0.62), and peer-vetted creative production (RII = 0.59). In terms of the extent of practice, electronic document exchange services received the highest relative importance index score (RII = 0.73), followed closely by e-payment platforms (RII = 0.73). The findings also indicated that crowdsourcing is considered beneficial for collection development (RII = 0.68) and is perceived to be useful in the procurement of new items for the library (RII = 0.67). However, the study identified inadequate institutional support (RII = 0.91) as the foremost challenge impeding the adoption and implementation of crowdsourcing practices in academic libraries in Nigeria. Other challenges included inadequate electricity supply and unstable Internet network systems in Nigeria which has hindered full deployment of crowdsourcing in academic library settings in the country.
Conclusion – This study emphasized the importance of the adoption and implementation of crowdsourcing practices in academic libraries in Nigeria. Addressing challenges related to institutional support, electricity supply, and Internet connectivity is crucial to creating an enabling environment for successful crowdsourcing initiatives.
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Adedeji, T. A. (2021). Realising the benefits of digital health implementation in a middle-income country: Applying theory of change in Nigerian primary care [Doctoral dissertation, University of Portsmouth].
- Andro, M., & Saleh, I. (2017). Digital libraries and crowdsourcing: A review. In S. Szoniecky & N. Bouhaï (Eds.), Collective intelligence and digital archives: Towards knowledge ecosystems (pp. 135–161). Wiley-ISTE.
- Barber, S. T. (2018). The zooniverse is expanding: crowdsourced solutions to the hidden collections problem and the rise of the revolutionary cataloguing interface. Journal of Library Metadata, 18(2), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2018.1489449
- Baydoun, S., & Pickens, R. V. (2021). Collaborative and active engagement at the hemispheric university: Supporting ethnic studies through academic library outreach at the University of Miami. In R. Pun, M. Cardenas-Dow, & K. S. Flash (Eds)., Ethnic studies in academic and research libraries (pp. 67–79). ACRL.
- Benoit III, E., & Eveleigh, A. (2019). Challenges, opportunities and future directions of participatory archives. In E. Benoit III & A. Eveleigh (Eds.), Participatory archives: Theory and practice (pp. 211–218). Cambridge University Press.
- Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Gil-Doménech, D., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E. (2020). Fostering university-industry collaborations through university teaching. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1638738
- Chun, S. A., & Artigas, F. (2012). Sensors and crowdsourcing for environmental awareness and emergency planning. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 1(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2012010106
- Corrall, S. (2022). The social mission of academic libraries in higher education. In T. Schlak, S. Corrall, & P. Bracke (Eds.), The social future of academic libraries: New perspectives on communities, networks, and engagement (pp. 109–148). Facet Publishing.
- Digout, J., Azouri, M., Decaudin, J. M., & Rochard, S. (2013). Crowdsourcing, outsourcing to obtain a creativity group. Arab Economic and Business Journal, 8(1–2), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aebj.2013.11.001
- Dunn, S., & Hedges, M. (2012). Crowd-sourcing scoping study: Engaging the crowd with humanities research. AHRC Arts and Humanities Research Council. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/crowd-sourcing-scoping-study-engaging-the-crowd-with-humanities-r
- Grange, E. S., Neil, E. J., Stoffel, M., Singh, A. P., Tseng, E., Resco-Summers, K., Fellner, B. J., Lynch, J. B., Mathias, P. C., Mauritz-Miller, K., Sutton, P. R., & Leu, M. G. (2020). Responding to COVID-19: The UW Medicine information technology services experience. Applied Clinical Informatics, 11(02), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709715
- Hasan, N., Khan, R. A., & Iqbal, J. (2017, November). Crowdsourcing and crowdfunding: An opportunity to libraries for promotion and resource generation in the changing scenario [Conference session]. 20th National Convention on Knowledge, Library and Information Networking (NACLIN-2017), New Delhi, India.
- Hendal, B. (2019). Hashtags as crowdsourcing: A case study of Arabic hashtags on Twitter. Social Networking, 8(4), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.4236/sn.2019.84011
- Kesselman, M., & Esquivel, W. (2019). Indiegogo and Kickstarter: Crowdfunding innovative technology and ideas for libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 36(10), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-09-2019-0063
- Lessl, M., Bryans, J. S., Richards, D., & Asadullah, K. (2011). Crowdsourcing in drug discovery. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, 10(4), 241–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3412
- Literat, I. (2017). Tapping into the collective creativity of the crowd: The effectiveness of key incentives in fostering creative crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1745–1754. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41366
- Lynch, R., Young, J. C., Boakye-Achampong, S., Jowaisas, C., Sam, J., & Norlander, B. (2021). Benefits of crowdsourcing for libraries: A case study from Africa. IFLA Journal, 47(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035220944940
- Opele, J. (2021). Analysing Likert scale options using rank versus relative importance index (RII). FUOYE International Journal of Education, 4(2), 103–112. https://fjed.fuoye.edu.ng/index.php/public_html/article/view/8/7
- Ponelis, S. R., & Adoma, P. (2018). Diffusion of open-source integrated library systems in African academic libraries: The case of Uganda. Library Management, 39(6–7), 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-05-2017-0052
- Qu, W. G., Pinsoneault, A., & Oh, W. (2011). Influence of industry characteristics on information technology outsourcing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(4), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270404
- Ramos, M., Sánchez-de-Madariaga, R., Barros, J., Carrajo, L., Vázquez, G., Pérez, S., Pascual, M., Martín-Sánchez, F., & Muñoz-Carrero, A. (2020). An archetype query language interpreter into MongoDB: Managing NoSQL standardized electronic health record extracts systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 101, 103339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103339
- Saadati, P., Pricope, E., & Abdelnour-Nocera, J. (2021, July). User engagement and collaboration in the next generation academic libraries [Paper presentation]. 34th British HCI Conference, London, United Kingdom.
- Severson, S., & Sauvé, J. S. (2019). Crowding the library: How and why libraries are using crowdsourcing to engage the public. Partnership, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v14i1.4632
- Simperl, E. (2015). How to use crowdsourcing effectively: Guidelines and examples. LIBERQuarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 25(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.9948
- Zakaria, N. A., & Abdullah, C. Z. H. (2018). Crowdsourcing and library performance in the digital age. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(3), 127–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i3/4353