Manuscripts Published in a Specific Chemistry Journal Must Be Both Important and Suitable According to Peer Reviewers / Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). The manuscript reviewing process: empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.010

Evidence Summaries

Manuscripts Published in a Specific Chemistry Journal Must Be Both Important and Suitable According to Peer ReviewersBornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). The manuscript reviewing process: empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.010[Record]

…more information

Michelle DuBroy
Discipline Librarian, Researcher Services, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
m.dubroy@griffith.edu.au

Online publication: Aug. 18, 2021

This article is a review of another work such as a book or a film. The original work discussed here is not available on this platform.

Volume 16, Number 2, 2021, p. 156–157