Cite this article
- MLA
-
Goldstein, Scott. "Publons Peer Evaluation Metrics are not Reliable Measures of Quality or Impact / Ortega, J. L. (2019). Exploratory analysis of Publons metrics and their relationship with bibliometric and altmetric impact. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2018-0153." Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, volume 14, number 3, 2019, p. 153–155. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29579
- APA
-
Goldstein, S. (2019). Review of [Publons Peer Evaluation Metrics are not Reliable Measures of Quality or Impact / Ortega, J. L. (2019). Exploratory analysis of Publons metrics and their relationship with bibliometric and altmetric impact. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2018-0153]. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(3), 153–155. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29579
- Chicago
-
Goldstein, Scott "Publons Peer Evaluation Metrics are not Reliable Measures of Quality or Impact / Ortega, J. L. (2019). Exploratory analysis of Publons metrics and their relationship with bibliometric and altmetric impact. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2018-0153". Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 14, no. 3 (2019) : 153–155. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29579
Export the record for this article
RIS
EndNote, Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
ENW
EndNote (version X9.1 and above), Zotero
BIB
BibTeX, JabRef, Mendeley, Zotero
