Abstracts
Résumé
Cette étude visait à déterminer dans quels contextes les jeunes de la rue qui s’injectent des drogues « partagent » des matériels d’injection. Nous avons mené des entrevues en profondeur auprès de 24 jeunes (15 à 22 ans) recrutés avec l’aide d’organismes communautaires et par la technique de « snowballing ». Au moment de la première injection, ces jeunes sont peu préoccupés par les risques d’infection et s’inquiètent davantage du risque de développer une dépendance. Cependant, ceux qui persistent sont conscients des risques associés au « partage » de seringues et considèrent qu’il s’agit d’une pratique à éviter dans une ville où les programmes de prévention fournissent l’accès gratuit aux seringues. Ce n’est toutefois pas le cas pour les autres matériels d’injection. Les contextes de vulnérabilité par rapport au « partage » se constituent au carrefour de plusieurs facteurs qui sont à la fois d’ordre individuel et social. Certains moments critiques dans la trajectoire de vie des jeunes par rapport à la consommation de drogues et à la vie dans la rue ainsi qu’un degré élevé d’intimité entre partenaires d’injection les fragilisent pour ce qui est des pratiques non sécuritaires.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to identify the contexts in which street youth who inject drugs share their injection equipment. In-depth interviews were conducted among youth recruited through community groups and utilizing a «snowballing» technique. We interviewed 24 youth (aged 15 to 22 years). At the time of their first injection, the youth are not very concerned with the risks of infection but worry more about developing an addiction. However, youth who continue to inject are aware of the risks associated with needle sharing and consider that, in a city where prevention programs provide free access to syringes, this practice should be avoided. This is not the case for other injection equipment. Contexts of vulnerability associated with sharing originate when personal and social factors intersect. Certain critical moments in a youth’s life related to drug consumption and living in the streets, as well as the high level of intimacy among injection partners make youth more vulnerable to unsafe practices.
Resumen
Este estudio pretendía identificar los contextos en los cuales el compartimiento del material de inyección se efectúa entre los jóvenes de la calle que se inyectan drogas. Entrevistas en profundidad han sido realizadas acerca de jóvenes reclutados a partir de organismos comunitarios y por la técnica de « snowballing ». Hemos interrogado 24 jóvenes (de 15 a 22 años). En el momento de la primera inyección se preocupan poco de los riesgos de infección, pero se inquietan sobre todo del riesgo de desarrollar una dependencia. Sin embargo, los jóvenes que persisten en la inyección están concientes de los riesgosd asociados al hecho de compartir las jeringas, y consideran que se trata de una práctica que se debe evitar en una ciudad dónde los programas de prevención procuran acceso gratis a las jeringas. No es el caso para los otros materiales de inyección. Los contextos de vulnerabilidad por respeto al hecho de compartir éste material, se constituyen en la encrucijada de varios factores a la vez de orden individual y social. Ciertos momentos críticos en la trayectoria de vida de los jóvenes en miras de su consumo de drogas y de su vida en la calle, así como un grado elevado de intimidad entre « compañeros de inyección » fragilizan a los jóvenes por respecto a prácticas poco seguras.
Appendices
Références
- Barnard, M. A. (1993). Needle Sharing in Context: Patterns of Sharing among Men and Women Injectors and HIV Risks. Addiction, 88(6): 805-812.
- Bibeau, G. & Perrault, M. (1990). Dérives montréalaises. À travers des itinéraires de toxicomanies dans le quartier Hochelaga-Maisonneuve. Montréal : Boréal.
- Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball Sampling Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods and Research, 10(2): 141-163.
- Bourgois, P. (1992). Une nuit dans une « shooting gallery », enquête sur le commerce de la drogue à East Harlem. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 94 : 59-78.
- Bourgois, P. (1998). The moral economies of homeless heroin addicts : confronting ethnography, HIV risk, and every day violence in San Francisco shooting encampments. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(11): 2325-2351.
- Bourgois, P. & Bruneau, J. (2000). Needle Exchange, HIV Infection, and Politics of Science : Confronting Canada’s Cocaine Injection Epidemic with Participant Observation. Medical Anthropology, 18: 325-350.
- Carlson, R. G., Siegal, H. A., Wang, J. et al. (1996). Attitudes toward Needle «Sharing» among Injection Drug Users : Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. Human-Organization, 55(3): 361-369.
- Cassin, S., Geoghegan, T., & Cox, G. (1998). Young injectors : a comparative analysis of risk behaviour. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 167(4): 234-237.
- Chitwood, D. D., McCoy, C. B., Inciardi J. A. et al. (1990). HIV-seropositivity of needles from shooting galleries in South Florida. American Journal of Public Health, 80(2): 150-152.
- Crisp, B. R., Barber, J. G. & Gilbertson, R. (1998). The relative importance of factors which influence order of injecting with a shared needle and syringe. AIDS Care, 10(6): 713-721.
- Darke, S., Kaye, S. & Topp, L. (2002). Cocaine use in New South Whales, Australia, 1996-2000 : 5-year monitoring of trends in price, purity, availability and use from the illicit drug reporting system. Drug Alcohol Dependence, 67(1): 81-88.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Introduction : Entering the field of quantitative research. In N.K. Denzin et Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, California : Sage Publications:1-17.
- Des Jarlais, D. C. (1989). The effectiveness of AIDS Educational Programs for Intravenous Drug Users. Prepared for the Office of Technology Assessment.
- Des Jarlais, D., Friedman, S. & Strug, D. (1986). AIDS and needle sharing within the IV drug subculture. In D. Feldman et T. Johnson (Eds.), The Social Dimensions of AIDS : Method and Theory, New York, Praeger: 115-125.
- Friedman, S. R., Des Jarlais, D.C., & Ward, T.P. (1994). Social Models for Changing Health-Relevant Behavior. In DiClemente, Peterson (Eds.), Preventing AIDS, New York : Plenum Press:95-115.
- Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago : Aldive Publication.
- Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior : a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health promotion, 11(2): 87-98.
- Goffman, E. (1975). Stigmate. Les usages sociaux des handicaps. Paris : Éditions de Minuit.
- Gossop, M., Griffith, P., Powis, S. et al., (1997). Continuing drug risk behavior : shared use of injecting paraphernalia among London heroin injectors. AIDS Care, 9(6): 651-660.
- Grund, J. P. C., Kaplan, C. D., & Adrians, N. F. P. (1991). Needle Sharing in the Netherlands : An Ethnographic Analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 81(12): 1601-1607.
- Guydish, J. R., Abramowitz, A., Woods, W. et al. (1990). Changes in needle sharing behaviour among intravenous drug users, San Francisco, 1986-1988. American Journal of Public Health, 80: 995-997.
- Hankins, C., Alary, M., Parent, R., Blanchette, C. & Claessens, C. (2002). The SurvUDI Working Group. Continuing HIV transmission among injection drug users in Eastern Central Canada : the SurvUDI Study, 1995 to 2000. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 30(5): 514-521.
- Hartgers, C., Van Ameijden, E. J., Van Den Hoek, J. A. R. et al. (1992). Needle Sharing and Participation in the Amsterdam Syringe Exchange program Among HIV-Seronegative Injecting Drug Users. Public Health Reports, 107(6): 675-681.
- Heimer, R., Khoshnood, K., Jariwala-Freeman, B. et al. (1996). Hepatitis in used syringes : the limits of sensitivity of techniques to detect hepatitis B, virus DNA, hepatitis C RNA, and antibodies to HBV Core and HCV antigens. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 173: 997-1000.
- Hudgins, R., McCusker, J. & Stoddard, A. (1995). Cocaine use and risky injection and sexual behaviors. Drug Alcohol Dependence, 37(1): 7-14.
- Jose, B., Friedman, S. R., Neaigus, A. et al. (1993). Syringe-mediated drug sharing (backloading) : a new risk factor for HIV among injecting drug users. AIDS, 7: 1653-1660.
- Kipke, M. D., Unger, J. B., Palmer, R. F. & Edgington, R. (1996). Drug use, needle sharing and HIV risk among injection drug-using street youth. Substance Use & Misuse, 31: 1167-1187.
- Koester, S. K. (1994). Copping, running, and paraphernalia laws, contextual variables and needle risk behavior among injection drug users in Denver. Human Organization, 53: 287-295.
- Koester, S., Booth, R. E. & Zhang, Y. (1996). The Prevalence of Additional Injection-Related HIV Risk Behaviors Among Injection Drug Users. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, 12(2): 202-207.
- Kral, A. H., Lorvick, J. & Edlin, B. R. (2000). Sex- and drug-related risk among populations of younger and older injection drug users in adjacent neighborhoods in San Francisco. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, 2000(24): 162-167.
- Lamothe, F., Vincelette, J., Bruneau, J. et al. (1997). Prevalence, seroconversion rates and risk factors for hepatitis B core, hepatitis C and HIV antibodies among intravenous drug users (IDU) of the Saint-Luc cohort. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 8(Suppl. A): 28A.
- Laperrière, A. (1997). La théorisation ancrée (grounded theory) : démarche analytique et comparaison avec d’autres approches apparentées. In G. Morin (Ed.), La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques, Paris : 309-332
- Latkin, C., Mandell, W., Vlahov, D. et al. (1994). My Place, Your Place, and No Place : Behavior Setting as a Risk Factor for HIV-Related Injection Practices of Drug Users in Baltimore, Maryland. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(3): 415-431.
- Latkin, C., Mandell, W., Vlahov, D. et al. (1996). People and Places : Behavioral Settings and Personal Network Characteristics as Correlates of Needle Sharing. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, 13(3): 273-280.
- Levounis, P., Galanter, M., Dermatis, H., Hamowy, A. & De Leon, G. (2002). Correlates of HIV transmission risk factors and considerations for interventions in homeless, chemically addicted and mentally ill patients. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 21(3): 61-72.
- Longshore, D. & Anglin, M. D. (1995). Intention to share injection paraphernalia : an empirical test of the AIDS risk reduction model among injection drug users. International Journal of the Addictions, 30(3): 305-321.
- Loxley, W. & Ovenden, C. C. (1995). Friends and lovers : needle sharing in young people in Western Australia. AIDS Care, 7(3): 337-351.
- Magura, S., Grossman, I., Lipton, J. et al. (1989). Determinants of Needle Sharing among Intravenous Drug Users. American Journal of Public Health, 70(4): 459-462.
- Michelat, G. (1975). Sur l’utilisation de l’entretien non directif en sociologie. Revue française de sociologie, XVI, 229-247.
- Miller, C. L., Johnston, C., Spittal, P. M. et al. (2002). Opportunities for prevention : Hepatitis C prevalence and incidence in a cohort of young injection drug users. Hepatology, 36, 747-742.
- Montgomery, S. B., Hyde, J., De Rosa, C. J., Rohrbach, L. A., Ennett, S., Harvey, S. M., Clatts, M., Iverson, E. & Kipke, M. D. (2002). Gender differences in HIV risk behaviors among young injectors and their social network members. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 28(3): 453-475.
- Murphy, S. (1987). Intravenous drug use and AIDS : Notes on the social economy of needle sharing. Contemporary Drug Problems, 14(3): 373-395.
- Neaigus, A., Friedman, S. R., Curtis, R. et al. (1994). The relevance of drug injectors’ social networks and risk networks for understanding and preventing HIV infection. Social Science and Medicine, 38(1): 67-78.
- Nelson, K. E., Galai, N., Safaeian, M., Strathdee, S. A., Celentano, D. D., Vlahov, D. (2002). Temporal trends in the incidence of human immunodeficiency virus infection and risk behavior among injection drug users in Baltimore, Maryland, 1988-1998. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156(7): 6410-6453.
- Ouellet, L. J., Jimenez, A. D., Johnson, W. A. et al. (1991). Shooting galleries and HIV disease : Variations in places for injecting illicit drugs. Crime & Delinquency, 37, 64-85.
- Patrick, D. M., Tyndall, M. W., Cornelisse, P. G. et al. (2001). Incidence of hepatitis C virus infection among injection drug users during an outbreak of HIV infection. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165, 889-895.
- Pires, A. P. (1997). Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative : essai théorique et méthodologique. In G. Morin (Ed.), La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques: 114-169. Paris.
- Plumridge, E. & Chetwynd, J. (1998). The moral universe of injecting drug users in the era of AIDS : sharing injecting equipment and the protection of moral standing. AIDS Care, 10(6): 723-733.
- Roy, É., Haley, N., Leclerc, P., Boivin, J.-F., Cédras, L. & Vincelette, J. (2001). Risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection among street youths. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165(5): 557-560.
- Roy, É., Haley, N., Leclerc, P., Cédras, L. & Boivin J.-F. (2002). Drug injection among street youth : The first time. Addiction, 97(8): 1003-1009.
- Roy, É., Haley, N., Leclerc, P., Lemire, N., Boivin, J. F., Frappier, J. & Claessens, C. (2000a). Prevalence of HIV Infection and Risk Behaviours Among Montreal Street Youth. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 11(4): 241-247.
- Roy, É., Nonn, É. & Haley, N. (2000b). L’injection de drogues chez les jeunes de la rue. In : G. Morin (éd.) sous la direction de P. Brisson, L’usage des drogues et la toxicomanie. Montréal : Gaëtan Morin éditeur ltée : 247-264
- Sherman, S. G., Latkin, A. C., Gielen, A. (2001). Social Factors related to Syringe sharing among injecting partners : A focus on gender. Substance Use & Misuse, 36(14): 2113-2136.
- Smyth, B. P., Barry, J. & Keenan, E. (2001). Syringe borrowing persists in Dublin despite harm reduction interventions. Addiction, 96(5): 717-727.
- Strathdee, S. A., Galai, N., Safaiean, M., Celentano, D. D., Vlahov, D., Johnson, L. & Nelson, K. E. (2001). Sex differences in risk factors for HIV seroconversion among injection drug users ; a 10-year perspective. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161: 1281-1288.
- Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research : Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (pp. 17-47, pp. 95-116, p. 185, pp. 187-188). Beverly Hills, California : Sage Publications.
- Thorpe, L. E., Bailey, S. L., Huo, D., Monterroso, E. R. & Ouellet, L. J. (2001). Injection-related risk behaviors in young urban and suburban injection drug users in Chicago (1997-1999). Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, 27(1): 71-78.
- UNAIDS. (2002). Report on the global AIDS epidemic. Geneva, Switzerland.
- Valente, T. W. et Vlahov, D. (2001). Selective risk taking among needle exchange participants : implications for supplemental interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 91(3): 406-411.
- Watters, J. K., Estilo, M. J., Clark, G. L. & Lorvick, J. (1994). Syringe and needle exchange as HIV/AIDS prevention for injection drug users. JAMA, 271(2): 115-120.
- World Health Organization. (1997). Weekly Epidemiologic Record. Hepatitis C, 72(10): 65-72.
- Zule, W. A. (1992). Risk and Reciprocity : HIV and the Injection Drug User. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 24(3): 243-249.