Abstracts
Abstract
Undergraduate students who are new to the social work profession enter into a complex socialization experience. New to the profession, they are expected to absorb a variety of knowledge and skills learned in separate courses and then integrate these together into an authentic performance as a social worker. Additionally, students are trained to confront personal bias and must learn to socially locate themselves and begin to form their own critical framework for understanding and responding to the influence of oppressive discourses on everyday systems, structures, practices, and experiences. Although the socialization process is essential to the development of a social work identity, there is little description in the social work education literature about students’ experiences of that process. Through using a practice demonstration video as teaching-learning resource for an undergraduate child welfare practice course, this paper presents our effort to examine how students position themselves in relation to practices and skills shown in the social worker-service-user interactions on the video. For the purposes of this pilot study, we used qualitative content analysis to generate a descriptive analysis of students’ written responses to viewing the video interactions. Analyses of these responses revealed that, although students were able to name and discuss the practices they observed through the video demonstration, they were also challenged by the interactions that demonstrated conflict, client resistance, and the overt use of power in the worker-service-user relationship. The results demonstrate the need for greater understanding of how students become socialized into the profession and develop their own unique identities as social workers.
Keywords:
- professional socialization,
- social work identity,
- social work education,
- social work practice,
- students,
- use of self,
- training
Résumé
Les étudiants de premier cycle qui ont peu ou pas d’experience en travail social vivent un processus de socialisation complexe. On attend d’eux qu’ils absorbent une variété de connaissances et de compétences qui sont acquises dans différents cours, puis qu’ils les intègrent ensemble dans une performance authentique en tant que travailleuse sociale ou travailleur social. En outre, les étudiants sont formés pour remettre en question leurs préjugés personnels et doivent apprendre à se situer socialement et à commencer à former leur propre cadre critique pour comprendre et répondre à l’influence des discours oppressifs sur les systèmes, structures, pratiques et expériences de tous les jours. Bien que le processus de socialisation soit essentiel au développement d’une identité professionnelle en travail social, les écrits sur l’enseignement du travail social décrivent peu les expériences des étudiants dans ce processus. En utilisant une démonstration d’intervention sur vidéo comme ressource pédagogique dans le cadre d’un cours de premier cycle sur l’intervention en protection de la jeunesse, cet article présente comment les étudiants se positionnent par rapport aux interventions et aux compétences montrées dans les interactions entre la travailleuse sociale et la personne qui utilise les services présentées dans la vidéo. Pour les besoins de cette étude pilote, nous avons utilisé une analyse de contenu qualitative pour générer une analyse descriptive des réponses écrites des étudiants après qu’ils aient visionné les interactions sur la vidéo. L’analyse de ces réponses a révélé que, bien que les étudiants aient été en mesure de nommer et de discuter des interventions qu’ils ont observées lors de la démonstration vidéo, ils ont également été confrontés à des interactions démontrant le conflit, la résistance et l’utilisation manifeste du pouvoir dans la relation entre l’intervenante et la personne recevant des services. Les résultats montrent qu’il est nécessaire de mieux comprendre comment les étudiants sont socialisés dans la profession et développent leur propre identité en tant que travailleuses sociales et travailleurs sociaux.
Mots-clés :
- socialisation professionnelle,
- identité professionnelle en travail social,
- formation en travail social,
- pratique du travail social,
- étudiants,
- utilisation de soi,
- formation
Appendices
Bibliography
- Adamowich, T., Kumsa, M. K., Rego, C., Stoddart, J., & Vito, R. (2014). Playing hide-and-seek: Searching for the use of self in reflective social work practice. Reflective Practice, 15(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.883312
- Badwall, H. (2014). Colonial encounters: Racialized social workers negotiating professional scripts of whiteness. Intersectionalities, 3, 1–23.
- Barlow, C., & Hall, B. L. (2007). ‘What about feelings?’: A study of emotion and tension in social work field education. Social Work Education, 26(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470601081712
- Barretti, M. (2004). What do we know about the professional socialization of our students? Journal of Social Work Education, 40(2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2004.10778493
- Bates, N., Immins, T., Parker, J., Keen, S., Rutter, L., Brown, K., & Zsigo, S. (2010). ‘Baptism of fire’: The first year in the life of a newly qualified social worker. Social Work Education, 29(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470902856697
- Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
- Beresford, P., Croft, S., and Adshead, L. (2008). ‘We don’t see her as a social worker’: A service user case study of the importance of the social worker’s relationship and humanity. British Journal of Social Work, 38(7), 1388–1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm043
- Bergen, A., & While, A. (2000). A case for case studies: exploring the use of case study design in community nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(4), 926–934. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01356.x
- Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Logie, C., Katz, E., Mylopoulos, M., & Regehr, G. (2011). Adapting objective structured clinical examinations to assess social work students’ performance and reflections. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900036
- Bogo, M., Katz, E., Regehr, C., Logie, C., Mylopoulos, M., & Tufford, L. (2013). Toward understanding meta-competence: An analysis of students’ reflection on their simulated interviews. Social Work Education, 32(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.738662
- Cheung, J. C. S. (2016). Researching practice wisdom in social work. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 25(3), 24–38. http://doi.org/10.18352/jsi.472
- Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E. H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1–20.
- Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00475.x
- Davies, L., Krane, J., Collings, S., & Wexler, S. (2007). Developing mothering narratives in child protection practice. Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650530601173516
- de Boer, C., & Coady, N. (2007). Good helping relationships in child welfare: Learning from stories of success. Child & Family Social Work, 12(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00438.x
- Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
- Eraut, M. (2000). Non‐formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158001
- Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch106
- Forrester, D., Kershaw, S., Moss, H., & Hughes, L. (2008). Communication skills in child protection: How do social workers talk to parents? Child & Family Social Work, 13(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00513.x
- Freund, A., Cohen, A., Blit-Cohen, E., & Dehan, N. (2017). Professional socialization and commitment to the profession in social work students: A longitudinal study exploring the effect of attitudes, perception of the profession, teaching, training, and supervision. Journal of Social Work, 17(6), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316651991
- Frost, E., Höjer, S., & Campanini, A. (2013). Readiness for practice: Social work students’ perspectives in England, Italy, and Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 16(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.716397
- Gelman, C. R., & Tosone, C. (2006). Making it real: Enhancing curriculum delivery through the use of student-generated training videos. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 24(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J017v24n01_03
- Heydt, M. J., & Sherman, N. E. (2005). Conscious use of self: Tuning the instrument of social work practice with cultural competence. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 10(2), 25–40.
- Holosko, M., Skinner, J., MacCaughelty, C., & Stahl, K. M. (2010). Building the implicit BSW curriculum at a large southern state university. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2010.200900068
- Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
- Hughes, J. and Chau, S. (2013). Making complex decisions: Child protection workers’ practices and interventions with intimate partner violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(4), 611–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.01.003
- Janssen-Noordman, A. M. B., Merriënboer, J. J., Van der Vleuten, C. P., & Scherpbier, A. J. (2006). Design of integrated practice for learning professional competences. Medical Teacher, 28(5), 447–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600825276
- Jarvis-Selinger, S., Pratt, D. D., & Regehr, G. (2012). Competency is not enough: Integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse. Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1185–1190. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182604968
- Juhila, K., Caswell, D., & Raitakari, S. (2014). Resistance. In C. Hall, K. Juhila, M. Matarese, C. and van Nijnatte (Eds.), Analysing Social Work Communication: Discourse in Practice (pp. 117–135). Routledge.
- Knight, C. (2012). Therapeutic use of self: Theoretical and evidence-based considerations for clinical practice and supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 31(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2012.676370
- Lay, K., & McGuire, L. (2010). Building a lens for critical reflection and reflexivity in social work education. Social Work Education, 29(5), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470903159125
- Loseke, D. R., & Cahill, S. E. (1986). Actors in search of a character: Student social workers’ quest for professional identity. Symbolic Interaction, 9(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1986.9.2.245
- Mandell, D. (2008). Power, care and vulnerability: Considering use of self in child welfare work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 22(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650530802099916
- Miller, S. E. (2010). A conceptual framework for the professional socialization of social workers. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20(7), 924–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911351003751934
- Miller, S. E. (2013). Professional socialization: A bridge between the explicit and implicit curricula. Journal of Social Work Education, 49(3), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2013.796773
- Mirick, R. (2012). Reactance and the child welfare client: Interpreting parents’ resistance to services through the lens of reactance theory. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 93(3), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4224
- Mirick, R. (2014). The relationship between reactance and engagement in a child welfare sample. Child & Family Social Work, 19(3), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12022
- Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling Psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260.
- O’Leary, P., Tsui, M. S., & Ruch, G. (2012). The boundaries of the social work relationship revisited: Towards a connected, inclusive and dynamic conceptualisation. British Journal of Social Work, 43(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr181
- Reupert, A. (2007). Social worker’s use of self. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35(2), 107–116.
- Reupert, A. (2009). Students’ use of self: Teaching implications. Social Work Education, 28(7), 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470802512689
- Robbins, S. P., Coe Regan, J., Ann R., Williams, J. H., Smyth, N. J., & Bogo, M. (2016). From the editor—The future of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1218222
- Rønnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (2003). The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025173508081
- Sussman, T., Bailey, S., Richardson, K. B., & Granner, F. (2014). How field instructors judge BSW student readiness for entry-level practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2014.856233
- Tham, P., & Lynch, D. (2014). Prepared for practice? Graduating social work students’ reflections on their education, competence and skills. Social Work Education, 33(6), 704–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.881468
- Todd, S. (2012). Practicing in the uncertain: Reworking standardized clients as improv theatre. Social Work Education, 31(3), 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.557427
- Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15, 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
- Valutis, S., Rubin, D., & Bell, M. (2012). Professional socialization and social work values: Who are we teaching? Social Work Education, 31(8), 1046–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.610785
- Weiss, I., Gal, J., & Cnaan, R. A. (2004). Social work education as professional socialization: A study of the impact of social work education upon students’ professional preferences. Journal of Social Service Research, 31(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v31n01_02
- Wilson, G., & Kelly, B. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of social work education: Preparing students for practice learning. British Journal of Social Work, 40(8), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq019
- Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge, 3(1), 97–114.