Abstracts
Abstract
This article argues for the need for attention to agency as well as structure in planning for complete neighbourhoods and communities, drawing upon collective capabilities theory and driven by a community-engaged research approach. While complete communities planning proposes to provide more fulsome social and physical infrastructure to residents in a context of urban growth and change in Canadian cities, contemporary efforts tend to neglect or disdain the agency and empowerment of residents. This logic and rationale for complete communities planning has shifted compared to the origins of neighbourhood planning in Canada, as will be exemplified here drawing upon the case of Vancouver. The application of the theory of collective capabilities in complete communities planning offers a path forward that is not naïve to the challenges posed by participatory planning and that views organizations other than the government as having collective capabilities to plan. We demonstrate the potential of this through the case of our community-engaged research partnership based at the South Vancouver Neighbourhood House. The project mobilized spatial and statistical research to document the extent of inequities and needs experienced in South Vancouver neighbourhoods as well as the collective capabilities of residents working through the neighbourhood house hub to provide essential services and do effective neighbourhood planning.
Keywords:
- complete communities,
- complete neighbourhoods,
- community development,
- neighbourhood planning
Résumé
Cet article défend la nécessité d'accorder de l'attention à l'agence et à la structure dans la planification de quartiers et de communautés complets, en s'appuyant sur la théorie des capacités collectives et en s'appuyant sur une approche de recherche engagée dans la communauté. Alors que la planification de communautés complètes propose de fournir une infrastructure sociale et physique plus complète aux résidents dans un contexte de croissance urbaine et de changement dans les villes canadiennes, les efforts contemporains tendent à négliger la nécessité de prêter attention à l'action des résidents. La logique et la raison d'être de la planification intégrale des communautés ont évolué par rapport aux origines de la planification des quartiers au Canada, comme nous le montrerons ici en nous appuyant sur le cas de Vancouver. L'application de la théorie des capacités collectives à la planification communautaire complète offre une voie à suivre qui n'est pas naïve face aux défis posés par une approche de la planification participative fondée sur la rationalité communicative. Nous démontrons le potentiel de cette approche à travers le cas de notre partenariat de recherche communautaire basé à la South Vancouver Neighborhood House. La recherche a mobilisé la recherche spatiale et statistique pour documenter l'étendue des inégalités et des besoins dans les quartiers de South Vancouver, ainsi que les capacités collectives des résidents travaillant dans le cadre de la maison de quartier pour fournir des services essentiels et réaliser une planification efficace du quartier.
Mots-clés :
- collectivités complètes,
- quartiers complets,
- développement communautaire,
- aménagement de quartiers
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- American Planning Association. (2023). Equity in Zoning Policy Guide. Washington, DC: APA. https://planning.org/publications/document/9264386/
- Axworthy, L. & Epstein, D. (1974). Discussion paper on urban populism and urban policy-making. Winnipeg: Institute of Urban Studies.
- Baker, S. & Mehmood, A. (2015). Social innovation and the governance of sustainable places. Local Environment 20(3), 321-334.
- Beasley, L. (2019). Vancouverism. Vancouver: UBC Press.
- Beldak-Miquel, S., Pellicer-Sifres, V., & Boni, A. (2020). Exploring the contribution of grassroots innovations to justice: using the capability approach to normatively address bottom-up sustainable transitions practices. Sustainability 12(9): 3617. https://doi.10.3390/su12093617
- Bouikidis, A. (2022). Community spaces as critical infrastructure: how the South Vancouver Neighbourhood House contributed to community resilience during the pandemic. Master of Urban Studies thesis. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University. https://summit.sfu.ca/item/35437
- C40 Cities. (2021). 15-minute cities: How to create ‘complete’ neighbourhoods. https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/15-minute-cities-How-to-create-complete-neighbourhoods?language=en_US
- City of Ottawa. (2021). The Ottawa Neighbourhood Equity Index. Ottawa. https://neighbourhoodequity.ca/
- City of Toronto. (2020). Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy. Toronto. https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-101394.pdf
- City of Vancouver [City of Vancouver]. (2020). COVID-19 today & tomorrow: Guide for planning how we adapt Vancouver, June 26.
- City of Vancouver. (2021a). Equity Framework: Getting our house in order. Vancouver, July 20. https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/equity-framework.pdf
- City of Vancouver. (2021b). Spaces to thrive: Vancouver social infrastructure strategy. Vancouver. https://council.vancouver.ca/20211208/documents/cfsc1.pdf
- City of Vancouver. (2022). Vancouver Plan. Vancouver. https://vancouverplan.ca/
- City of Vancouver. (2023a). Video: Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities - June 28, 2023. Vancouver.
- City of Vancouver. (2023b). Data for equity. Vancouver. https://vancouver.ca/people-programs/research-and-data-toward-a-healthy-city-for-all.aspx
- D’Amato, C. (2020) Collectivist capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 21(2), 105-120. http://doi.10.1080/19452829.2020.1732887
- DeFilippis, J., Fisher, R., & Shragge, E. (2010). Contesting Community: the limits and potential of local organizing. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
- Edelson, N. (2019). Jim Green Memorial Guest Lecture. Vancouver. https://www.sfu.ca/vancity-office-community-engagement/library/2019/JimGreenMemorial2019.html
- Evans, P. (2002). Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom. Studies in Comparative International Development 37(2), 54–60. https;//doi:10.1007/BF02686261
- Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Goossens, C., Oosterlynck, S. & Bradt, L. (2019). Livable streets? Green gentrification and the displacement of longtime residents in Ghent, Belgium. Urban Geography 41(4), 550-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1686307
- Grant, J. (2023). Complete community : planning theory from practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 90(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2023.2207619
- Greater Vancouver Regional District. (1976). Livable Region Strategic Plan. Burnaby.
- Hartt, M., DeVertueil, G. & Potts, R. (2022). Age-unfriendly by design: built environment and social infrastructure deficits in Greater Melbourne. Journal of the American Planning Association 89(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2035247
- Healey, P. (2023). Caring for Place: Community development in rural England. London: Routledge.
- Hillier, J. & van Looij, T. (1997). Who speaks for the poor? International Planning Studies 2(1), 7-25.
- Holden, M., Firth, C. & Fassihi, F. (2021). South Vancouver and Marpole neighbourhood equity report. Vancouver: South Vancouver Neighbourhood House. https://summit.sfu.ca/item/32344
- Homsy, G.C. & Kang, K.E. (2022). Zoning incentives: exploring a market-based land use planning tool. Journal of the American Planning Association 89(1), 61-71. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1080/01944363.2022.2050935
- Ibrahim, S. S. (2006). From individual to collective capabilities: the capability approach as a conceptual framework for self‐help. Journal of Human Development 7(3), 397-416.
- Innes, J. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14(3), 183-191.
- Janssen, C. & Basta, C. (2022). Are good intentions enough? Evaluating social sustainability in urban development projects through the capability approach. European Planning Studies 32(2), 368-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2136936
- Johnson D.L. (2002). Origin of the neighbourhood unit. Planning Perspectives 17(3), 227-245.
- Laskey, A. & Nicholls, W. (2019). Jumping off the ladder: participation and insurgency in Detroit’s urban planning. JAPA 85(3), 348-362. http://doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1618729
- Lauer, S., Yan, M.C., & Stebner, E. (2021). History of Vancouver neighbourhood houses and beyond. In Hulchanski, D., Yan, M.C. & Lauer, S. (eds) Neighbourhood Houses. Vancouver: UBC Press, p.29-65.
- Loo, Tina. (2019). Moved by the State: Forced relocation and making a good life in Postwar Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.
- Mackness, K., White, I., & Barrett, P. (2023). 20-minute neighbourhoods: opportunities and challenges. In Filho, W.L. et al. (eds.) Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future. Cham: Springer, p. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_172-1
- Mahoney, T., Grain, K., Fraser, P., & Wong, J. (2021). Community Resource Handbook: A guide to community-engaged research. Vancouver: SFU CERi. https://www.sfu.ca/ceri/resources/publications/community-resource-handbook.html
- Marchigiani, E. & Bonfantini, B. (2022). Urban transition and the return of neighbourhood planning – questioning the proximity syndrome and the 15-Minute City. Sustainability 14(9), 5468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095468
- Mayhew, B.W. (1967). Local areas of Vancouver. Vancouver: United Community Services of the Greater Vancouver Area.
- McAfee, A. (1997). When theory meets practice –citizen participation in planning. Plan Canada 37(3), 18-22.
- Metro Vancouver (2023). Metro Vancouver Housing Data Book. https://metrovancouver.org/services/regional-planning/Documents/metro-vancouver-housing-data-book-2023.pdf
- Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gal, C. & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-minute city”: sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities. https://doi.10.3390/SMARTCITIES4010006
- Moulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E., Martinelli, F. & Gonzalez, S. (2010). Can neighbourhoods save the city? Community development and social innovation. London: Routledge.
- Mukhija, V., & Takahashi, L. M. (2022). Enhancing sharing capabilities: Housing and neighbourhood planning opportunities for improving health. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2052157
- My Health My Community [MHMC]. (2014). Summary results by community & neighbourhood. Vancouver: Vancouver Coastal Health, Fraser Health Authority, University of British Columbia. https://myhealthmycommunity.org/explore-results/results-by-community/
- Nouri, MJ., Holden, M., Sones, M., Winters, M., & Mahmood, A. (2022). Knowledge Synthesis for the Emerging Asocial Society: Social quality of life in high-density built environments. Vancouver. https://summit.sfu.ca/item/35349
- Pivo, G. (2005). Creating compact and complete communities: Seven propositions for success. Practicing Planner (American Institute of Certified Planners). https://www.u.arizona.edu/~gpivo/Practicing%20Planner%20Pub.pdf
- Punter, J. (2003). The Vancouver Achievement: urban planning and design. Vancouver: UBC Press.
- Robeyns, I. (2018). The capabilities approach. In S. Olsaretti (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards Cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. New York: Wiley.
- Schlosberg, D., & Carruthers, D. (2010). Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Global Environmental Politics, 10(4), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00029
- Schmidtke, O. (2021). The eyes and ears of the community: engaging citizens and community advocacy. In Hulchanski, D., Yan, M.C. & Lauer, S. (eds.) Neighbourhood Houses. Vancouver: UBC Press.
- Seelig, M. & Seelig, J. (1997). CityPlan: Participation or abdication? Plan Canada 37(3), 18-22.
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
- Simone, A. (2004). People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3), 407-429. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-16-3-407
- South Vancouver Neighbourhood House. (2023). South Vancouver Neighbourhood House – Reframing South Vancouver Initiative Evaluation Report. Vancouver: Level Up Planning Collaborative, Inc.
- Stewart, F. (2013). Capabilities and human development: Beyond the individual – the critical role of social institutions and social competencies. In Malik, K. & Kugler, M. (eds.) Human Progress and the Rising South, 79–112. New York: UNDP.
- Sturgeon, D., Holden, M. & Molina, A. (2016). What does neighbourhood theory mean for ecourbanism? Articulo Journal of Urban Research 14. https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3128
- Thurber, S. (2021). Exploring the creation of a local and equitable food hub in South Vancouver. Vancouver: UBC Sustainability Scholars report. https://sustain.ubc.ca/about/resources/exploring-creation-local-and-equitable-food-hub-south-vancouver
- Walker, R.H. & K.D. Derickson. (2022). Mapping prejudice: the limits and opportunities of data for anti-racist planning. Journal of the American Planning Association https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2112743
- Williams, P., Binet, A., Alhasan, D.M., Riley, N.M. & Jackson, C.L. (2022). Urban planning for health equity must employ an intersectionality framework. Journal of the American Planning Association 89(2), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2079550
- Zha, C.C., Jansen, B., Banchoff, A., et al. (2022) Integrating Photovoice and Citizen Science: The Our Voice Initiative in Practice. Health Promotion Practice 23(2), 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399211054784
- Zhang, S., Zhen, F., Kong, Y., Lobsang, T. & Zou, S. (2023). Towards a 15-minute city: a network-based evaluation framework. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221118570