Abstracts
Abstract
Enhancing productivity is a common rationale for devolution, outsourcing and new institutional configurations and a recurring theme in public administration reforms. Functions such as urban planning, infrastructure development, water management, and transportation planning have clear spatial characteristics wherein their governance ideally spans their functional use and/or management. These considerations have led to municipal amalgamations and two-tier governance in an effort to consolidate functions and build economies of scale and to the creation of special purpose, intermediate or regional bodies to manage public investments and deliver specialised services. While there is a growing urban literature on governance at the right scale in certain policy areas, far fewer studies explore these factors in lower density places (towns and rural and remote areas). Moreover, how effective and efficient governance might boost productivity both within the institution and more generally, across the local/regional economy is underexplored. This paper takes stock of how governance at the right scale might improve public sector productivity in different types of places—urban, rural and remote. It draws on theoretical, empirical and policy literature to explore how scale matters to public sector productivity and governance.
Keywords:
- spatial productivity,
- governance,
- public sector,
- urban,
- rural,
- remote
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Acknowledgements
This paper was prepared as a background document for an OECD-EC High-level Expert Workshop “Productivity Policy for Places” (Productivity Policy for Places - OECD) that received funding from the European Union. Many thanks to Alexandra Tsvetkova and Alexander Lembcke (OECD) for their leadership and review and to Catheryn Johnson for her research assistance. I am also grateful to Isabelle Chatry, Dorothée Allain-Dupré, Rudiger Ahrend (OECD), Patrick Dunleavy (LSE), all panel participants, the three anonymous CJRS peer reviewers and Co-Editor Dr. Breau for their comments and review. The content of the paper is the sole responsibility of the author and should not be reported to reflect the opinion or as being endorsed by the OECD or the European Union.
Bibliography
- Allers, M.A. & Geertsema, J.B. (2016). The Effects of Local Government Amalgamation on Public Spending, Taxation, and Service Levels: Evidence From 15 Years of Municipal Consolidation, Journal of Regional Science, 56(4): 659–682.
- Allmendinger, P. & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft Spaces, Fuzzy Boundaries, and Metagovernance: The New Spatial Planning in the Thames Gateway, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(3): 617–633.
- Askim, J., Klausen, J.E., Vabo, S.I. &Bjurstrøm, K. (2016). What Causes Municipal Amalgamation Reform? Rational Explanations Meet Western European Experiences, 2004–13, Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis, 59–79.
- Atkinson, A. (2005). The Atkinson Review: Final Report: Measurement of Government Output and Productivity for the National Accounts, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, England. ISBN 9781403996466.
- Atkinson, R. (2019). The Small Towns conundrum: What do we do about them?, Regional Statistics, 9(2): 3–19.
- Basílio, M., Pires, C., Borralho, C. & dos Reis, J.P. (2020). Local government efficiency: is there anything new after Troika’s intervention in Portugal?, Eurasian Economic Review, 10(2): 309–332.
- Bhatti, Y. & Hansen, K.M. (2011). Who ‘marries’ whom? The influence of societal connectedness, economic and political homogeneity, and population size on jurisdictional consolidations, European Journal of Political Research, 50(2): 212–238.
- Bish, R. (1971). The public economy of metropolitan areas, Chicago: Markham Publishing Company, 176 p.
- Blöchliger, H., Bartolini, D. & Stossberg, S. (2016). Does Fiscal Decentralisation Foster Regional Convergence?, OECD Economic Policy Papers, 17, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlr3c1vcqmr-en.
- Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K. & Serritzlew, S. (2014). Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System, American Journal of Political Science, 58(4): 790–803.
- Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K., Serritzlew, S. & Treisman, D. (2016). Jurisdiction size and local government policy expenditure: Assessing the effect of municipal amalgamation, American Political Science Review, 110(4): 812–831.
- Bradford, N. (2011). Territory and Local Development; A Place-Based Perspective, Working paper of theInternational Development Research Centre, 1–28.
- Bradford, N. (2017). Canadian regional development policy: Flexible governance and adaptive implementation EC-OECD Seminar Series on Designing better economic development policies for regions and cities, EC-OECD Seminar Series on Designing Better Economic Development Policies, 1–32.
- Buciega, A., Pitarch, M.-D. & Esparcia, J. (2009). The Context of Rural–Urban Relationships in Finland, France, Hungary, The Netherlands and Spain, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(1): 9–27.
- Burkett, P. (2006). Total Factor Productivity”, Organization & Environment, 19(2): 171–190.
- Charbit, C. & Romano, O. (2017). Governing together: An international review of contracts across levels of government for regional development, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2017/04, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ff7c8ac4-en.
- Cobban, T.W. (2019). Bigger Is Better: Reducing the Cost of Local Administration by Increasing Jurisdiction Size in Ontario, Canada, 1995–2010., Urban Affairs Review, 55(2): 462–500.
- Colquhoun, H.L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K.K., Straus, S., Tricco, A.C., Perrier, L. & Kastner, M. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1 December.
- Conto, F., Djelveh, S., Perri, M., Faccilongo, N. & Pazienza, P. (2015). Enhancing The Rural-Urban Relations Through The Living Labs Experience. A Reflection on Local Development Policies in the Puglia Region, Conference proceedings, Practice and Research in Private and Public Sector, 76–88.
- Curristine, T., Lonti, Z. & Joumard, I. (2007). Improving Public Sector Efficiency, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(1): 1–41.
- Devaney, M. & Weber, W.L. (2000). Productivity growth, market structure, and technological change: Evidence from the rural banking sector, Applied Financial Economics, 10(6): 587–595.
- Dollery, B., Grant, B. & Kortt, M. (2013). An Evaluation of Amalgamation and Financial Viability in Australian Local Government, Public Finance and Management, 13(3): 215–238.
- Douglas, D.J.A. (2005), “The restructuring of local government in rural regions: A rural development perspective”, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 231–246.
- Dunleavy, P. (2017). Public sector productivity: Measurement challenges, performance information and prospects for improvement Executive summary Introduction: Government productivity in the modern era, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 17(1): 153–179.
- ESPON. (2021). The Effects of Territorial Governance on Urbanization and Land-Use Development | ESPON, ESPON Blog, available at: https://www.espon.eu/interventions-and-their-effects-urbanization-and-land-use-development (accessed 14 February 2021).
- ESPON TOWN. (2014). TOWN Small and Medium Sized Towns in Their Functional Territorial Context Final Report, available at: www.espon.eu (accessed 19 February 2021).
- Faulk, D., Schaal, P. & Taylor, C.D. (2013). How Does Local Government Amalgamation Affect Spending? Evidence from Louisville, Kentucky, Public Finance and Management, 13(2): 80–98.
- Gendźwiłł, A., Kurniewicz, A. & Swianiewicz, P. (2020). The Impact of Municipal Territorial Reforms on the Economic Performance of Local Governments. A Systematic Review of Quasi-experimental Studies, Space and Polity, 25(1): 1–20.
- Government of Canada. (2020). Task Force: Just Transition for Canadian Coal Power Workers and Communities, available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/task-force-just-transition.html (accessed 17 November 2020).
- Günter, A. & Gopp, E. (2021). Overview and Classification of Approaches to Productivity Measurement, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2019-0241 .
- Hjalager, A.-M. (2017). Rural–urban business partnerships—Towards a new trans-territorial logic, Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 32(1): 34–54.
- Hulst, R., van Montfort, A., Haveri, A., Airaksinen, J. & Kelly, J. (2009). Institutional Shifts in Inter-municipal Service Delivery, Public Organization Review, 9(3): 263–285.
- Hulten, C.R. (2000). Total Factor Productivity: A Short Biography, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=213430 (accessed 2 February 2021).
- Jong, D., Tsvetkova, A., Lembcke, A.C. & Ahrend, R. (2021). A Comprehensive Approach to Understanding Urban Productivity Effects of Local Governments: Local Autonomy, Government Quality and Fragmentation, OECD Regional Development Papers, No. 11, https://doi.org/10.1787/5ebd25d3-en. (accessed 14 February 2021).
- Jordahl, H. & Liang, C.Y. (2010). Merged Municipalities, Higher Debt: On Free-riding and the Common Pool Problem in Politics, Public Choice, 143(1): 157–172.
- Kawka, R. (2013). New Paradigm in Action, Ministry of Regional Development, Poland, https://www.hutton.ac.uk/sites/default/files/files/andrew’s%20article-%20warsaw.pdf, pp. 52–65. (accessed 14 February 2021).
- Klok, P.-J., Denters, B., Boogers, M. & Sanders, M. (2018). Intermunicipal Cooperation in the Netherlands: The Costs and the Effectiveness of Polycentric Regional Governance, Public Administration Review, 78(4): 527–536.
- Krawchenko, T. (2011). Regional Special Purpose Bodies for Transportation and Transit in Canada: Case Studies of Translink and Metrolinx, Canadian Journal of Regional Science 34(1): 1-9.
- Lau, E., Lonti, Z. & Schultz, R. (2017). Challenges in the Measurement of Public Sector Productivity in OECD Countries, International Productivity Monitor: 1-16, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#search. (accessed 1 October 2020).
- Lehman, B. (2000). Report card on restructuring - Municipal World, Municipal World, https://www.municipalworld.com/articles/report-card-on-restructuring/. (accessed 1 October 2020).
- Lyons, J. (2015). Local Government Structure and the Co-ordination of Economic Development Policy, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 48(1): 173–193.
- Mayer, H., Habersetzer, A. & Meili, R. (2016). Rural–Urban Linkages and Sustainable Regional Development: The Role of Entrepreneurs in Linking Peripheries and Centers”, Sustainability, https://agris-fao-org.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/agris-search/search.do?recordID=CH2018130389 (accessed 15 February 2021).
- Nielsen, G., Hsu, Y. & Jacob, L. (2002). Public Culture and the Dialogics of Democracy: Reading the Montreal and Toronto Amalgamation Debates, Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 11(1): 111–140.
- O’Toole, K. and Burdess, N. (2004). New Community Governance in Small Rural Towns: The Australian Experience, Journal of Rural Studies, 20(4): 433–443.
- OECD. (2015), Governing the City, OECD Publishing , https://www.oecd.org/governance/governing-the-city-9789264226500-en.htm (accessed 13 February 2021).
- OECD. (2017), Multi-Level Governance Reforms: Overview of OECD Country Experiences, OECD Multi-Level Governance Studies, OECD, available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264272866-en.
- OECD. (2019), Making Decentralisation Work: A Handbook for Policy-Makers, OECD Publishing, Paris, available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264279049-en.
- OECD. (2020), Regions and Cities at a Glance, OECD publishing, available https://doi.org/10.1787/959d5ba0-en.
- Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C.M. & Warren, R. (1961). The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry, The American Political Science Review, 55(4): 831 p.
- Pierron, J.R. & Roca, A. (2017). France: New Government, New Focus on Medical Deserts?, The Lancet Public Health, Elsevier Ltd, 1 August.
- Pollack, M.A. (1996). The New Institutionalism and EC Governance: The Promise and Limits of Institutional Analysis, Governance, 9(4): 429–458.
- Public Policy Forum. (2014), Changing the Game: Public Sector Productivity in Canada, pp. 1-24, https://ppforum.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Public_Sector_Productivity_01-07-15_1.pdf.
- Raderschall, L., Krawchenko, T. & Leblanc, L. (2020). Leading Practices for Resource Benefit Sharing and Development for and with Indigenous Communities, Paris, https://www-oecd-ilibrary-org.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/urban-rural-and-regional-development/leading-practices-for-resource-benefit-sharing-and-development-for-and-with-indigenous-communities_177906e7-en.
- OECD (2008). Reforming the Municipal Service Sector, in OECD Economic Surveys: Finlandhttps://doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-fin-2008-6-en.
- Regmi, K., Naidoo, J., Pilkington, P.A. & Greer, A. (2010). Decentralization and District Health Services in Nepal: Understanding the Views of Service Users and Service Providers, Journal of Public Health, 32(3): 406–417.
- Rodríguez-Pose, A., Tijmstra, S.A.R. & Bwire, A. (2009). Fiscal Decentralisation, Efficiency, and Growth, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(9): 2041–2062.
- Rosen, E.D. (1993), Improving Public Sector Productivity: Concepts and Practice, Sage publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
- Sanz-Barbero, B., Otero García, L. & Blasco Hernández, T. (2012). The Effect of Distance on the Use of Emergency Hospital Services in a Spanish Region with High Population Dispersion: A Multilevel Analysis, Medical Care, 50(1): 27–34.
- Servillo, L., Atkinson, R. & Hamdouch, A. (2017). Small and Medium-Sized Towns in Europe: Conceptual, Methodological and Policy Issues, Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 108(4): 365–379.
- Sinnewe, E., Kortt, M.A. & Dollery, B. (2016). Is Biggest Best? A Comparative Analysis of the Financial Viability of the Brisbane City Council, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(1): 39–52.
- Steiner, R., Kaiser, C. & Eythórsson, G.T. (2016). A Comparative Analysis of Amalgamation Reforms in Selected European Countries, Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis, Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 23–42.
- Stemler, S. (2000). An Overview of Content Analysis, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(17): https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34.
- Stevis, D. & Felli, R. (2014). Global Labour Unions and Just Transition to a Green Economy, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15(1): 29–43.
- lo Storto, C. (2016). The Trade-off between Cost Efficiency and Public Service Quality: A Non-parametric Frontier Analysis of Italian Major Municipalities, Cities, 51: 52–63.
- Thuesen, A.A. (2017). Local Democracy in Large Municipalities: Co-creating Democracy and Rural Development Through Multi-level Participation Structures and Local Development Plans, Town Planning Review, 88(3): 327–348.
- Tiebout, C.M. (1956), A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, 64(5): 416–424.
- Tran, C.D.T.T. & Dollery, B. (2019), Council Type and the Determinants of Municipal Expenditure: A Semiparametric Analysis of South Australian Local Government, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(4): 631–650.
- Tsvetkova, A., Ahrend, R., Oliveira, J., Lembcke, A.C., Knutsson, P., Jong, D. & Terzidis, N. (2020). The Spatial Dimension of Productivity : Connecting the dots across Industries , Firms and Places, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2020/01, https://doi.org/10.1787/ba5edb47-en.
- Webber, D., Curry, N. & Plumridge, A. (2009). Business Productivity and Area Productivity in Rural England, Regional Studies, 43(5): 661–675.
- Woods, M. (2005). Rural Geography: Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring, Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 1-304.