Abstracts
Résumé
Cette étude pilote explore la perception d’enfants de maternelle de leur participation lors de la lecture d’histoire en classe et de leur intérêt à la lecture, dans le but de démontrer la faisabilité d’utilisation de cette source de données dans le cadre d’études plus larges. La chercheuse a mené des entrevues individuelles semi-dirigées en visioconférence auprès de six enfants et analysé qualitativement celles-ci avec une analyse thématique (Braun et Clarke, 2013). Les résultats indiquent que les enfants participent lorsque leur enseignante pose une question à la classe, plutôt que de leur propre initiative. Les témoignages des participant[e]s révèlent une certaine tension entre la participation des enfants et la gestion de classe que leur enseignante doit assurer. Les résultats donnent également à penser que l’intérêt que portent les participant[e]s à la lecture ne se traduit pas nécessairement en habitudes autonomes de lecture fréquentes en classe ni en une perception d’être un lecteur. Un des enfants avait une enseignante ayant reçu de l’accompagnement professionnel sur la lecture interactive et l’utilisation de cette approche transparait clairement dans l’entrevue avec cet enfant. Les résultats justifient de poursuivre l’étude sur la participation des enfants lors de la lecture d’histoire en classe de maternelle et sur leur intérêt à la lecture en utilisant leur perception, aussi jeunes soient-ils, comme source de données. Cette dernière pourrait également être utile pour explorer l’impact d’interventions portant sur des pratiques en lecture. Les verbatims tirés de cette étude pourraient être incorporés à des formations continues destinées aux enseignant[e]s.
Mots-clés :
- lecture interactive,
- lecture partagée,
- participation,
- intérêt à la lecture,
- perception des enfants,
- communication enseignant-enfant
Abstract
This pilot study explores the perception of kindergarten children regarding their participation during storybook reading in class and their interest in reading, as a proof of concept of using this source of data in extended research. Six children participated in an online, semi-structured individual interview, which was analyzed qualitatively with a thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2013). Results suggest that the children participate when the teacher asks a question to the class, rather than through their own initiative. The participants’ testimonials reveal a certain tension between the children’s participation and the class management provided by their teacher. Results suggest as well that the children’s interest in reading does not necessarily translate into frequent autonomous reading habits in class, nor does it lead to being perceived as a reader. One child had a teacher who received professional development on interactive book reading, and the use of this approach was evident in this child’s interview. The results justify further research on children’s participation during storybook reading and their interest in reading using the perception of children, even as young as kindergarten age, as a source of data. The latter could also be useful for documenting the impact of interventions on reading practices. Verbatims from this study could be incorporated into professional development for teachers.
Keywords:
- Interactive book reading,
- Shared book reading,
- Participation,
- Interest in reading,
- Children’s perception,
- Communication teacher-child
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Alatalo, T. et Westlund, B. (2021). Preschool teachers’ perceptions about read-alouds as a means to support children’s early literacy and language development. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 21(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798419852136
- Archer, A. L. et Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press.
- Bautista, A., Moreno-Núñez, A., Siew-Chin, N. et Bull, R. (2018). Preschool educators’ interactions with children about sustainable development: Planned and incidental conversations. International Journal of Early Childhood, 50(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-018-0213-0
- Bilaloğlu, R. G., Arnas, Y. A. et Yaşar, M. (2017). Question types and wait-time during science related activities in Turkish preschools. Teachers and Teaching, 23(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203773
- Blewitt, P. et Langan, R. (2016). Learning words during shared book reading: The role of extratextual talk designed to increase child engagement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 404–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.009
- Boisclair, A. et Makdissi, H. (2010). Compréhension du récit chez le jeune enfant, émergence de la littératie et contexte socioculturel. Dans D. Doyon et C. Fisher (dir.), Langage et pensée à la maternelle (p. 149–183). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Braun, V. et Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
- Buckingham, J., Beaman, R. et Wheldall, K. (2014). Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The early years. Educational Review, 66(4), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.795129
- Carr, R. C., Mokrova, I. L., Vernon-Feagans, L. et Burchinal, M. R. (2019). Cumulative classroom quality during pre-kindergarten and kindergarten and children’s language, literacy, and mathematics skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 47(2), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.12.010
- Cash, A. H., Ansari, A., Grimm, K. J. et Pianta, R. C. (2019). Power of two: The impact of 2 years of high quality teacher child interactions. Early Education and Development, 30(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2018.1535153
- Castles, A., Rastle, K. et Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
- Cunningham, A. E. et Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2) 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.264
- Dawes, E., Leitão, S., Claessen, M. et Kane, R. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of an oral inferential comprehension intervention for young children with developmental language disorder. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 35(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659018815736
- Dionne, A.-M. (2015). Lire des textes informatifs ou narratifs aux élèves ? Choix et conceptions des enseignants. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 41(3), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.7202/1035312ar
- Dockett, S. et Perry, B. (2004). “As I got to learn it got fun”: Children’s reflections on their first year at school [Communication]. Conférence annuelle de l’Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne. https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2004/doc04324.pdf
- Dockrell, J. E., Bakopoulou, I., Law, J., Spencer, S. et Lindsay, G. (2015). Capturing communication supporting classrooms: The development of a tool and feasibility study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 31(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659015572165
- Dowdall, N., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Murray, L., Gardner, F., Hartford, L. et Cooper, P. J. (2020). Shared picture book reading interventions for child language development: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 91(2), e383–e399. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13225
- Fortin, M.-F. et Gagnon, J. (2016). Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche : méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives (3e éd.). Chenelière éducation.
- Gest, S. D., Holland-Coviello, R., Welsh, J. A., Eicher-Catt, D. L. et Gill, S. (2006). Language development subcontexts in Head Start classrooms: Distinctive patterns of teacher talk during free play, mealtime, and book reading. Early Education and Development, 17(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1702_5
- Girolametto, L., Weitzman, E., Lefebvre, P. et Greenberg, J. (2007). The effects of in-service education to promote emergent literacy in child care centers: A feasibility study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2007/007)
- Grifenhagen, J. F. et Barnes, E. M. (2022). Reimagining discourse in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 75(6), 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2108
- Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A. et You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. Dans S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly et C. Wylie (dir.), Handbook of research on student engagement (p. 601–634). Springer.
- Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A. et Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.4.232-246
- Hammett Price, L., Bradley, B. A. et Smith, J. M. (2012). A comparison of preschool teachers’ talk during storybook and information book read-alouds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.02.003
- Hindman, A. H., Wasik, B. A. et Bradley, D. E. (2019). How classroom conversations unfold: Exploring teacher-child exchanges during shared book reading. Early Education and Development, 30(4), 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2018.1556009
- Hutchby, I. et Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2e éd.). Polity Press.
- Justice, L. M. et Kaderavek, J. N. (2004). Embedded-explicit emergent literacy intervention I: Background and description approach. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/020)
- Justice, L. M. et McGinty, A. S. (2013). Read it again – preK! A preschool curriculum supplement to promote language and literacy foundations (3e éd.) The Ohio State University.
- Kiiveri, K. et Määttä, K. (2012). Children’s opinions about learning to read. Early Child Development and Care, 182(6), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2011.579737
- Kilpatrick, D. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing, and overcoming reading difficulties. Wiley.
- Langsted, O. (1994). Looking at quality from the child’s perspective. Dans P. Moss et A. Pence (dir.), Valuing quality in early childhood services: New approaches to defining quality (p. 28–42). Paul Chapman.
- Law, J., McBean, K. et Rush, R. (2011). Communication skills in a population of primary school-aged children raised in an area of pronounced social disadvantage. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 46(6), 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00036.x
- Lefebvre, P., Trudeau, N. et Sutton, A. (2011). Enhancing vocabulary, print awareness and phonological awareness through shared storybook reading with low-income preschoolers. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(4), 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411416581
- Lerkkanen, M.-K., Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Viljaranta, J., Poikkeus, A.-M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Siekkinen, M. et Nurmi, J.-E. (2012). The role of teaching practices in the development of children’s interest in reading and mathematics in kindergarten. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.03.004
- Lever, R. et Sénéchal, M. (2011). Discussing stories: On how a dialogic reading intervention improves kindergartners’ oral narrative construction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.002
- Lonigan, C. J. et Whitehurst, G. J. (1998). Relative efficacy of parent and teacher involvement in a shared-reading intervention for preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(2), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80038-6
- Mascareño, M., Snow, C. E., Deunk, M. I. et Bosker, R. J. (2016). Language complexity during read-alouds and kindergartners’ vocabulary and symbolic understanding. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.001
- McGeown, S., Bonsall, J., Andries, V., Howarth, D. et Wilkinson, K. (2020). Understanding reading motivation across different text types: Qualitative insights from children. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(4), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12320
- McMahon-Morin, P., Rezzonico, S., Trudeau, N. et Croteau, C. (2021). Interactive book-reading to improve inferencing abilities in kindergarten classrooms: A clinical project. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 37(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659020974430
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. et Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4e éd.). SAGE.
- Mol, S. E. et Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021890
- Mukamurera, J., Lacourse, F. et Couturier, Y. (2006). Des avancées en analyse qualitative : pour une transparence et une systématisation des pratiques. Recherches qualitatives, 26(1), 110–138. https://doi.org/10.7202/1085400ar
- National Early Literacy Panel (NELP). (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. National Institute for Literacy; National Center for Family Literacy. https://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/NELPReport09.pdf
- Noble, C., Sala, G., Peter, M., Lingwood, J., Rowland, C., Gobet, F. et Pine, J. (2019). The impact of shared book reading in children’s language skills: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, article 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100290
- Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Viljaranta, J. et von Suchodoletz, A. (2021). Investigating bidirectional links between the quality of teacher–child relationships and children’s interest and pre-academic skills in literacy and math. Child Development, 92(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13431
- Pentimonti, J. M., Justice, L. M., Yeomans-Maldonado, G., McGinty, A. S., Slocum, L. et O’Connell, A. (2017). Teachers’ use of high- and low-support scaffolding strategies to differentiate language instruction in high-risk/economically disadvantaged settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815117700865
- Sandberg, G. (2017). Different children’s perspectives on their learning environment. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1216633
- Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J. et Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030
- Sénéchal, K., Messier, G. et Dumouchel, M. (2021). L’oral réflexif repensé au regard d’une gestion de la classe responsabilisante : impacts d’une recherche sur la formation initiale en didactique de l’oral. Revue internationale de communication et socialisation, 8(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16599428.v1
- Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
- Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. http://www.jstor.org/stable/747612
- Tangen, R. (2008). Listening to children’s voices in educational research: Some theoretical and methodological problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250801945956
- Viljaranta, J., Kiuru, N., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Silinskas, G., Poikkeus, A.-M. et Nurmi, J.-E. (2017). Patterns of word reading skill, interest and self-concept of ability. Educational Psychology, 37(6), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1165798
- Walgermo, B. R., Frijters, J. C. et Solheim, O. J. (2018). Literacy interest and reader self-concept when formal reading instruction begins. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 44(3), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.03.002
- Wasik, B. A. et Bond, M. A. (2001). Beyond the pages of a book: Interactive book reading and language development in preschool classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.243
- Wasik, B. A. et Hindman, A. H. (2013). Realizing the promise of open-ended questions. The Reading Teacher, 67(4), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1218
- Wasik, B. A. et Hindman, A. H. (2014). Understanding the active ingredients in an effective preschool vocabulary intervention: An exploratory study of teacher and child talk during book reading. Early Education and Development, 25(7), 1035–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2014.896064
- Wasik, B. A. et Hindman, A. H. (2018). Why wait? The importance of wait time in developing young students’ language and vocabulary skills. The Reading Teacher, 72(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1730
- Willingham, D. T. (2017). The reading mind: A cognitive approach to understand how the mind reads. Jossey-Bass.