Abstracts
Abstract
Tutors in higher education institutions often face the challenge of aligning learning outcomes, subject matters, instructional activities, and assessment practices. Drawing from a decade of teaching experience, the authors employ practical action research (PAR) to develop a common anchor for achieving alignment. Their project unfolds in three phases: baseline data collection, intervention development and use, and post-intervention evaluation. Baseline data analysis revealed the intricacies of evaluating alignment within class lessons, emphasizing the need to reevaluate current practices. The interventions, mapped to the cognitive and knowledge dimensions of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, were transformative tools aimed at achieving alignment. Post-intervention data analysis demonstrated tangible changes in lesson outlines and responses to follow-up questions, validating the effectiveness of the interventions. The authors underscore the importance of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives as a facilitator for alignment, offering tutors a practical and straightforward approach. The authors conclude by proposing the scalability of this approach during semester planning, providing tutors with a systematic framework to achieve alignment. Additionally, they suggest avenues for future research, exploring beyond the cognitive and knowledge dimensions to enhance the alignment phenomenon in educational practices.
Keywords:
- Bloom's Taxonomy,
- Educational objectives,
- Higher education,
- Learning outcomes,
- Action research,
- Pedagogical alignment
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Biographical notes
Gembo Tshering, PhD, is an Assistant Professor at Paro College of Education, Royal University of Bhutan. His research interests include comparative education, educational evaluation, and teacher education. He earned his Master of Science from the University of Twente in the Netherlands and his PhD from La Trobe University in Australia.
Rinchen Tshewang, PhD, is an Assistant Professor at Paro College of Education, Royal Universty of Bhutan. He earned his Master of Science from Curtin University in Australia and his PhD from Queensland University of Technology in Australia.
Tashi Dendup was a lecturer at Paro College of Education. He is currently pursuing a PhD program in Australia.
Tandin Peljor was a lecturer at Paro College of Education. He is currently pursuing his second Master’s program in Australia.
Bibliography
- Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P., et al. (2000). Taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Abridged 1st ed.). Pearson.
- Arievitch, I. M. (2020). The vision of developmental teaching and learning and Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100473
- Biggs, J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. (1996). Higher Education, 32, 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
- Biggs, B. J. & Collis, F. K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York: ACADEMIC PRESS.
- Boluk, K. A. (2022). Integrated curriculum design: An empowering and engaging pedagogical approach preparing 21st Graduates. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 38(3), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1937156X.2022.2099326
- Chizhik, E. W. & Chizhik, A. W. (2018). Using activity theory to examine how teachers’ lesson plans meet students’ learning needs. The Teacher Educator, 53(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2017.1296913
- Creswell, J. W. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Delany, C., Kosta, L., Ewen, S., Nicholson, P., Remedios, L., & Harms, L. (2016). Identifying pedagogy and teaching strategies for achieving nationally prescribed learning outcomes. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(5), 895-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1138450
- Farrell, T. S., & Ashcraft, N. (2024). Lesson planning. TESOL Press.
- Fink, D. L. (2005). Integrated course design. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center. https://www.ideaedu.org/idea_papers/integrated-course-design/
- Fink, D.L. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses, revise and updated. Jossey-Bass.
- Gershon, M. (2018). Great teaching made easy: How to use Bloom’s taxonomy in the classroom? The complete guide. LSI.
- Granite State College. (n.d.). Ch. 8 Bloom’s taxonomy. Retrieved from https://granite.pressbooks.pub/teachingdiverselearners/chapter/blooms-taxonomy-2/
- Gunn, J. (2017). How do we actually know a lesson went well? Retrieved from https://resilienteducator.com/classroom-resources/how-do-we-actually-know-a-lesson-went-well/
- Hook, P., Manger, R., & Wall, S. (2015). An action research project with SOLO taxonomy. Essential Resources Ltd.
- Huberman, M. A. & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Iqbal, H., Siddiqie, S. A., & Mazid, A. (2021). Rethinking theories of lesson plan for effective teaching and learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100172
- Irons, A., & Elkington, S. (2021). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Routledge.
- Irvine, J. (2021). Taxonomies in education: Overview, comparison, and future directions. Journal of Education and Development, 5(2), 2-25. https://doi.org/10.20849 /jed.v5i2.898
- Jacobs, S. D. (2018). A history and analysis of the evolution of action and participatory action research. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 19(3), 34-52.
- Krathwohl, R.D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
- Lawson, G. (2021). Strategies for managing disengaged students. English Australian Journal, 37(2), 54-58. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/INFORMIT.11479206835 8088
- McNiff, J. & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research: An introduction. SAGE.
- Mills, E. G. (2014). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (5th ed.). Pearson.
- Nagro, S. A., Fraser, D. W., & Hooks, S. D. (2019). Lesson planning with engagement in mind: Proactive classroom management strategies for curriculum instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(3), 131-140. https:/doi.org/10.1177/105345128767905
- NACADA. (n.d.). Teaching in Blooms: A guide to levels of learning and teaching strategies. https://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Portals/0/Events/AssessmentInst/2017/Documents/H1-H3%20Packet.pdf
- Orr, R. B., Csikari, M. M., Freeman, S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2022). Writing and using learning objectives. CBE Life Science Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-04-0073
- Royal University of Bhutan (n.d.). The wheel of academic law. https://www.rub.edu.bt/regulation/
- Royal University of Bhutan. (2020). Guidelines for writing program documents. https://www.rub.edu.bt/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/2020-Programme_Develop ment_Guidelines.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- Stringer, T. E., Christensen, M. L., & Baldwin, C. S. (2010). Integrating teaching, learning, and action research: Enhancing instruction in the k-12 classroom. SAGE.
- Tshering, G. (2012). Developing a national assessment model to inform educational policy in Bhutan (Doctoral dissertation, La Trobe University).
- University of Waterloo. (n.d.). Bloom’s taxonomy learning activities and assessments. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/resources/teaching-tips/bloo ms-taxonomy-learning-activities-and-assessments
- Victoria State Government. (2017). High impact teaching strategies: Excellence in teaching and learning. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers /support/high-impact-teaching-strategies.pdf
- Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed). Virginia: ASCD.