Abstracts
Abstract
Drug regulatory bodies aim to ensure that patients have access to safe and effective drugs; however, no matter the quality of pre-licensure studies, uncertainty will remain regarding the safety and effectiveness of newly approved drugs until a large and diverse population uses those drugs. Recent analyses of Canada’s post-market drug surveillance (PMDS) system have found that Canada’s PMDS system requires strengthening and that efforts must be improved to monitor and address the safety and effectiveness of approved drugs among vulnerable populations. Given the uncertainty that exists when drugs enter the market, some have suggested that the precautionary principle is relevant to guiding decision-making in this context. This paper responds to recommendations that the Canadian PMDS system should be responsive to the health needs of vulnerable populations by assessing the utility of deploying the precautionary principle to guide a post-market strategy for vulnerable populations.
Keywords:
- precautionary principle,
- uncertainty,
- vulnerable populations,
- postmarket drug surveillance,
- pharmaceutical regulation
Résumé
Les organismes de réglementation des médicaments visent à garantir que les patients aient accès à des médicaments sûrs et efficaces. Toutefois, quelle que soit la qualité des études préalables à l’autorisation de mise sur le marché, l’incertitude subsistera quant à la sécurité et à l’efficacité des médicaments nouvellement approuvés tant qu’une population nombreuse et diversifiée n’utilisera pas ces médicaments. Des analyses récentes du système canadien de surveillance des médicaments après leur mise sur le marché (PMDS) ont révélé que le PMDS du Canada doit être renforcé et que les efforts doivent être améliorés pour surveiller et traiter la sécurité et l’efficacité des médicaments approuvés parmi les populations vulnérables. Étant donné l’incertitude qui règne lorsque les médicaments entrent sur le marché, certains ont suggéré que le principe de précaution est pertinent pour guider la prise de décision dans ce contexte. Ce document répond aux recommandations selon lesquelles le système canadien de surveillance des médicaments après leur mise sur le marché devrait répondre aux besoins de santé des populations vulnérables en évaluant l’utilité de déployer le principe de précaution pour guider une stratégie post-commercialisation pour les populations vulnérables.
Mots-clés :
- principe de précaution,
- incertitude,
- populations vulnérables,
- surveillance des médicaments après leur mise sur le marché,
- réglementation pharmaceutique
Appendices
Bibliography
- 1. Fisher CB. A relational perspective on ethics-in-science decisionmaking for research with vulnerable populations. IRB Ethics Hum Res. 1997;19(5):1–4. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3564120 doi: 10.2307/3564120
- 2. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady C. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(5):930–7. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/189/5/930/810459 doi: 10.1086/381709
- 3. Flaskerud JH, Winslow BJ. Conceptualizing vulnerable populations health-related research. Nurs Res. 1998;47(2):69-78. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/nursingresearchonline/Abstract/1998/03000/Conceptualizing_Vulnerable_Populations.5.aspx
- 4. Zion D, Gilliam L, Loff B. The declaration of Helsinki, CIOMS and the ethics of research on vulnerable populations. Nat Med. 2000; 6(6):615-7. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0600_615 doi: 10.1038/76174
- 5. Health Canada. Forward Regulatory Plan 2019-2021: Regulations amending the Food and Drug Regulations, Part C, and the Medical Devices Regulations (Flexible Lifecycle-Based Licensing for Drugs and Medical Devices). Canada.ca [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Government of Canada; 2019. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/about-health-canada/legislation-guidelines/acts-regulations/forward-regulatory-plan/plan/flexible-lifecycle-based-licensing-drugs-medical-devices.html
- 6. Callreus T. The precautionary principle and pharmaceutical risk management. Drug Saf. 2005;28(6):465-71. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00002018-200528060-00001 doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528060-00001
- 7. Soule E. The precautionary principle and the regulation of US food and drug safety. J Med Philos. 2004;29(3):333-50. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jmp/article-abstract/29/3/333/848809 doi: 10.1080/03605310490500536
- 8. Osimani B. The precautionary principle in the pharmaceutical domain: a philosophical enquiry into probabilistic reasoning and risk aversion. Health Risk Soc. 2013;15(2):123-43. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698575.2013.771736 doi: 10.1080/13698575.2013.771736
- 9. Lexchin J. New drugs and safety: what happened to new active substances approved in Canada between 1995 and 2010? Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(21):1680-1. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/1377415 doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4444
- 10. Health Canada. Risk Classification of Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP) Observations. Health Products and Food Branch Inspectorate. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/compliance-enforcement/good-manufacturing-practices/guidance-documents/risk-classification-pharmacovigilance-observations-0063.html
- 11. Canadian Medical Association Journal Editorial. Is Canada’s drug safety network effective? CMAJ, May 19, 2015, 187(8).
- 12. Ogilvie KK, Eggleton A, Cordy J, Dyck LE, Eaton N, Enverga T, et. al. Prescription pharmaceuticals in Canada: post-approval monitoring of safety and effectiveness. Ottawa (ON): Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology, Senate, Parliament, Canada; 2013 Mar [cited 2019 Jan 26]. 42 p. Catalogue No.: YC17-0/411-20E-PDF. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/sen/yc17-0/YC17-0-411-20-eng.pdf
- 13. Maxwell N, Dube L, Carroll M, Andayo I, Lamontagne D, Ysselstein M. 2011 Fall report of the Auditor General of Canada [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Office of the Auditor General of Canada; 2011. Chapter 3, Regulating Pharmaceutical Drugs—Health Canada; [cited 2019 Jan 26]; [about 33 screens]. Available from: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201111_04_e_35936.html
- 14. Gordillo V, del Amo J, Soriano V, Gonzalez-Lahoz J. Sociodemographic and psychological variables influencing adherence to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 1999;13(13):1763-9. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/Fulltext/1999/09100/Sociodemographic_and_psychological_variables.21.aspx doi: 10.1097/00002030-199909100-00021
- 15. Kaplan RC, Bhalodkar NC, Brown EJ Jr, White J, Brown DL. Race, ethnicity, and sociocultural characteristics predict noncompliance with lipid-lowering medications. Prev Med. 2004;39(6):1249-55. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743504002610?via%3Dihub doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.041
- 16. Mastroianni AC. Slipping through the net: social vulnerability in pandemic planning. Hastings Cent Rep. 2009; 39(5):11-2. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/317114 doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0186
- 17. Smith MJ, Bernard C, Rossiter K, Sahni S, Silva D. Vulnerability: a contentious and fluid term. Hastings Cent Rep. 2010;40(1):5-6. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/371011 doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0233
- 18. A framework for the application of precaution in science-based decision making about risk. Ottawa (ON): Privy Council Office; 2003 [cited 2017 Jan 30]. 13 p. Catalogue No.: CP22-70/2003E-IN. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/CP22-70-2003E.pdf
- 19. Kriebel D, Tickner J. Reenergizing public health through precaution. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(9),1351-5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1446776/ doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.9.1351
- 20. The treaty of Amsterdam amending the treaty on European Union, the treaties establishing the European communities and certain related acts. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1997 [cited 2017 Jan 28]. 144 p. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/treaty/pdf/amst-en.pdf ISBN: 92-828-1652-4.
- 21. Goldstein BD. The precautionary principle also applies to public health actions. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(9):1358-61. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1446778/ doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.9.1358
- 22. Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations; 1992 Aug [cited 2017 Jan 30]. Available from: https://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm Report No.: A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I)
- 23. Ashford N, Barrett K, Bernstein A, et. al. Wingspread statement on the precautionary principle [Internet]. Eugene (OR): Science & Environmental Health Network; 1998 [cited 2017 Jan 30]. 2 p. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ad8bb3336099bd6ed7b022a/t/5cc2113553450acab6d955a1/1556222261401/Wingspread+Statement.pdf
- 24. Jensen KK. The moral foundation of the precautionary principle. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2002;15(1):39-55. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1013818230213 doi: 10.1023/A:1013818230213
- 25. John S. Risk and Precaution. In: Dawson A, editor. Public health ethics: key concepts and issues in policy and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 67-84
- 26. Sachs NM. Rescuing the strong precautionary principle from its critics. Univ Ill Law Rev. 2011;1285. Available from: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=law-faculty-publications
- 27. Waller PC, Evans SJ. A model for the future conduct of pharmacovigilance. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12(1):17-29. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pds.773 Doi: 10.1002/pds.773
- 28. Gordon C. International pharmaceutical social risk regulation: an ethical perspective. Acta Pharm. 2011;61(1):15-23. Available from: https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/acph/61/1/article-p15.xml doi: 10.2478/v10007-011-0010-x
- 29. Callreus T. Pharmacovigilance and public health ethics. Pharmaceut Med. 2013;27(3):157-64. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40290-013-0016-4 doi: 10.1007/s40290-013-0016-4
- 30. Callreus T, Schneider CK. The emergence of regulatory science in pharmaceutical medicine. Pharmaceut Med. 2013;27(6):345-51. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40290-013-0039-x doi: 10.1007/s40290-013-0039-x
- 31. Campbell A. The SARS commission interim report: SARS and public health in Ontario. Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(2):118-26. Available from: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/153871304323146423 doi: 10.1089/153871304323146423
- 32. Krever H. Final report: commission of inquiry on the blood system in Canada. Ottawa (ON): Commission of Inquiry on the Blood System in Canada; 1997 [cited 2019 Jan 26]. 375 p. Catalogue No.: CP32-62/3-1997E-PDF. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/CP32-62-3-1997-1E.pdf
- 33. Ross W, Birkwood P, Henter T, Krewsiki D, Muise AM, Nahas A. Health Canada decision-making framework for identifying, assessing and managing health risks. Ottawa (ON): Health Canada; 2000 Aug 1 [cited 2017 Jan 30]. 80 p. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/ahc-asc/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/pubs/risk-risques-eng.pdf
- 34. Scheifele D. IMPACT after 17 years: Lessons learned about successful networking. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2009;20(1):12-14. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690519/
- 35. Lexchin J. Those who have the gold make the evidence: how the pharmaceutical industry biases the outcomes of clinical trials of medications. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012;18(2):247-61. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11948-011-9265-3 doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9265-3
- 36. Bill C-17, Protecting Canadians from Unsafe Drugs Act (Vanessa's Law), 2nd Sess, 41st Parl, 2014
- 37. Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle [Internet]. Brussels: European Commission; 2002 Feb 2 [cited 2017 Jan 26]; Available from: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/21676661-a79f-4153-b984-aeb28f07c80a/language-en
- 38. Bill C-17 An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act - Protecting Canadians from Unsafe Drugs [Internet]. Ottawa(ON): Canadian Medical Association; 2014 [cited 2017 Jan 26]; Available from https://www.cma.ca/Assets/assets-library/document/en/advocacy/Brief-Bill%20C-17_(Vanessa_s_Law)-FINAL.pdf
- 39. Lemmens T, Bouchard RA. Regulation of pharmaceuticals in Canada. In: Downie J, Caulfield T, Flood C, editors. Canadian Health Law and Policy. 3rd ed. Toronto: Butterwoths; 2007. p. 318-87
- 40. Health Canada. Optimizing the Use of Real World Evidence to Inform Regulatory Decision-Making. Health Products and Food Branch Notice. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/announcements/optimizing-real-world-evidence-regulatory-decisions.html