Abstracts
Abstract
This paper advances a new and updated understanding of memory that should also change the coordinates of the memory enhancement debate. Instead of thinking of memory as a storehouse, we should think of memory from a narrative perspective. This view allows for a better understanding of the process in which we actually construct our memories by elaborating meaningful summaries, rather than adding discrete elements. I argue that this new way of thinking about memory makes most of the memory enhancement technologies we have or will have in the near future much less ethically problematic. The main idea is that (biological) memory interacts with memory enhancement in the creative and re-elaborative way it ordinarily does. To conclude, I discuss some cases to illustrate the previous points.
Keywords:
- memory,
- memory enhancement,
- narrative identity,
- neuroscience,
- neuroethics
Résumé
Le présent texte avance une compréhension nouvelle et actualisée de la mémoire qui devrait également modifier les coordonnées du débat sur l’amélioration de la mémoire. Au lieu de considérer la mémoire comme un entrepôt, nous devrions penser la mémoire d’un point de vue narratif. Ce point de vue permet de mieux comprendre le processus par lequel nous construisons réellement nos souvenirs, c’est-à-dire en élaborant des résumés significatifs, plutôt que d’ajouter des éléments distincts. Je soutiens que cette nouvelle façon de penser la mémoire rend la plupart des technologies d’amélioration de la mémoire, que nous avons ou que nous aurons dans un proche avenir, beaucoup moins problématique sur le plan éthique. L’idée principale est que la mémoire (biologique) interagit avec l’amélioration de la mémoire de manière créative et réélaborative comme elle le fait habituellement. Pour conclure, j’évoquerai quelques cas pour illustrer les points précédents.
Mots-clés :
- mémoire,
- amélioration de la mémoire,
- identité narrative,
- neurosciences,
- neuroéthique
Appendices
Bibliography
- 1. Squire LR. Memory and brain systems: 1969–2009. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009; 29(41):12711–12716.
- 2. Kourken M, Sutton J. Memory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/memory/
- 3. Brockmeier J. Beyond the archive: memory, narrative, and the autobiographical process. Oxford Scholarship Online. 2015. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199861569.001.0001
- 4. Schechtman M. The truth about memory. Philosophical Psychology. 1994;7(1):3-18. DOI: 10.1080/09515089408573107
- 5. Miller MD. What college teachers should know about memory: a perspective from cognitive psychology. College Teaching. 2011;59(3):117-122, DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2011.580636
- 6. Baddeley AD. Human memory: Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1998.
- 7. Blatti S. Animalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.); 2019. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/animalism/
- 8. Luria AR. The mind of a mnemonist: A little book about a vast memory. Harvard: University Press; 1987.
- 9. Quian Quiroga R. The forgetting machine: memory, perception, and the “Jennifer Aniston neuron”. Dallas: BenBella Books; 2017.
- 10. O’Shea M. The Brain. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
- 11. Liao SM, Sandberg A. The normativity of memory modification. Neuroethics. 2008;1:85–99.
- 12. Erler A. Does memory modification threaten our authenticity? Neuroethics. 2010;4:235–249.
- 13. Levy N. Neuroethics: ethics and the sciences of the mind. Philosophy Compass. 2009;4(1):69–81.
- 14. Bostrom N, Sandberg A. Cognitive enhancement: Methods, ethics, regulatory challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2009;15:311–341.
- 15. Spiers HJ, Bendor D. Enhance, delete, incept: Manipulating hippocampus-dependent memories. Brain Research Bulletin. 2014;105:2–7.
- 16. Jacobs S, Tsien JZ. Genetic overexpression of NR2B subunit enhances social recognition memory for different strains and species. Plos one. 2012;7(4):1-11.
- 17. Glannon W. Psychopharmacological enhancement. Neuroethics. 2008;1:45–54.
- 18. Maslen H, Faulmüller N, Savulescu J. Pharmacological cognitive enhancement - how neuroscientific research could advance ethical debate. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2014;8:Article 107.
- 19. Boniolo G. The Ontogenesis of human identity. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 2005;80(56):5.
- 20. Heersmink R. Distributed selves: personal identity and extended memory systems. Synthese. 2017;194:3135–3151. DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1102-4
- 21. DeGrazia D. Human Identity and Bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
- 22. Pitman RK, Delahanty DL. Conceptually driven pharmacologic approaches to acute trauma. CNS Spectrum. 2005;10:99–106.
- 23. Vaiva G, et al. Immediate treatment with propranolol decreases posttraumatic stress disorder two months after trauma. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:947–9.
- 24. Greene J, Cohen J. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B. 2004;359:1775–1785.
- 25. Feldman D. Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales, Oxford University Press; 2002.
- 26. Weissenbacher A. Defending Cognitive liberty in an age of moral engineering. Theology and Science. 2018;16(3):288-299. DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2018.1488476.
- 27. Bolt LLE. True to oneself? broad and narrow ideas on authenticity in the enhancement debate. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2007;28:285–300.
- 28. Gerlai R. Memory enhancement: the progress and our fears. Genes, Brain and Behavior. 2003;2:187–190.
- 29. Bell C, Gemmell J. Total recall: how the E-memory revolution will change everything. Dutton; 2009.
- 30. Sellen AJ, Whittaker S. Beyond total capture: A constructive critique of lifelogging. Communications of the ACM. 2010;53(5):70–77.
- 31. Mayer-Schönberger V. Delete: the virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton University Press; 2011.
- 32. Clowes R. Thinking in the cloud: the cognitive incorporation of cloud-based technology. Philos. Technol. 2015;28:261–296.
- 33. Carr N. The shallows: how the Internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London: Atlantic; 2010.
- 34. Greenfield,S. ID: the quest for identity in the 21st Century. London: Sceptre; 2008.
- 35. Turkle S. Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic; 2011.
- 36. Konrad A, Isaacs E, Whittaker S. Technology-mediated memory: is technology altering our memories and interfering with well-being? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2016;23(4):Article 23.
- 37. Sas C, Whittaker S. Design for forgetting: disposing of digital possessions after a breakup. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France. ACM. 2013.1823–1832.
- 38. Walker WR, Skowronski JJ, Thompson CP. Life is pleasant–and memory helps to keep it that way! Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2003;7:203–210.
- 39. Mitchell TR, Thompson L, Peterson E, Cronk R. Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “rosy view””. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1997;33:421–448.
- 40. Walker WR, Skowronski JJ. The fading affect bias: But what the hell is it for?” Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2009;23:1122–1136.
- 41. Campbell RS, Pennebaker JW. The secret life of pronouns: Flexibility in writing style and physical health. Psychol. Sci. 2003;14:60–65.
- 42. Heersmink R. The narrative self, distributed memory, and evocative objects. Philos Stud. 2018;175:1829–1849 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0935-0
- 43. Levy N. Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.