Abstracts
Abstract
Over three decades ago, Carol Gilligan’s seminal book In a Different Voice provided feminist theorists with a powerful new approach to address the shortcomings of traditional moral theories. With a focus on concrete situations, an ethics of care can attend to the specifics of moral dilemmas that might otherwise be glossed over. As feminist reflection on moral and political philosophizing has progressed, another challenge has emerged. Recent feminist scholarship proposes non-ideal theories as preferable action-guiding theories. In this paper, I examine Kittay’s call for a version of care ethics as a naturalized ethics that comes from lived experience, in order to draw out the salient characteristics of the caring agent. This allows me to show how Kittay’s key assertion that “we are all some mother’s child” resonates with Ricoeur’s framing of self-esteem, which is, in turn, anchored on a notion of solicitude. Secondly, I make the case that care ethics can benefit from Ricoeur’s little ethics as it helps buttress the goal of good caring practices. Finally, care ethics, with its emphasis on the universality of care needs, helps to strengthen the central role of solicitude for the political sphere.
Résumé
Il y a plus de trente ans, le livre fondateur de Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice, fournissait aux théoriciennes féministes une nouvelle approche permettant d’affiner la critique des théories morales traditionnelles, particulièrement en ce qui concerne leur universalisme. Focalisant sur les situations concrètes, l’éthique du care chez Gilligan permet de recentrer l’attention sur les spécificités d’un dilemme moral qui, autrement, risquent de rester dans l’ombre. La réflexion féministe en philosophie morale et politique a progressé depuis, s’attelant à de nouveaux défis. La recherche récente suggère qu’une théorie morale non idéale (émergeant des situations vécues) est préférable aux théories dites idéalistes. Dans cet article, j’examine l’éthique du care selon Eva Feder Kittay, soit à titre d’éthique naturalisée (enracinée dans l’expérience), afin de mettre en relief les caractéristiques saillantes de l’agent.e caring. Cela me permettra ensuite de montrer comment l’affirmation clé de Kittay selon laquelle « nous sommes tou.te.s l’enfant d’une mère » fait écho à la pensée ricoeurienne de l’estime de soi qui est, en retour, ancrée dans la notion de sollicitude. Deuxièmement, je soutiens que la « petite éthique » ricoeurienne peut enrichir les éthiques du care (notamment celle de Kittay), précisément en ce qui a trait au telos du care. Ce faisant, les éthiques du care, qui placent l’accent sur l’universalité des besoins en cette matière, pourront mieux ancrer la sollicitude dans la sphère politique.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Caputo, Annalisa, “Paul Ricoeur, Martha Nussbaum and the ‘Incapability Approach’”, in Roger W. H. Savage (ed.), Paul Ricoeur in the Age of Hermeneutical Reason: Poetics, Praxis and Critique, London, Lexington Books, 2015, p. 49-68.
- Garrau, Marie, “Le care entre dépendance et domination: L’intérêt de la théorie néorépublicaine pour penser une ‘caring society’”, Les ateliers de L’éthique/The Ethics Forum, vol. 4, no. 2, 2009, p. 26-42.
- Gilligan, Carol, In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 1982.
- Graham, Janice E. and Taewyn Bassen, “Reciprocal Relations: The Recognition and Co-Construction of Caring with Alzheimer’s Disease”, Journal of Aging Studies, vol. 20, 2005, p. 335-349.
- Held, Virginia, The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political and Global, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.
- Kittay, Eva, Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency, New York, Routledge 1999.
- Kittay, Eva, “When Caring Is Just and Justice Is Caring: Justice and Mental Retardation”, PublicCulture, vol. 13, no. 3, 2001, p. 557-580.
- Kittay, Eva, “Caring for the Vulnerable by Caring for the Caregiver: The Case of Mental Retardation,” in Rosamond Rhodes, Margaret P. Battin and Anita Silvers (eds.), Medicine and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care, New York, Oxford University Press, First edition, 2002, p. 290-300.
- Kittay, Eva, “The Ethics of Philosophizing: Ideal Theory and the Exclusion of People with Severe Cognitive Disabilities”, in Lisa Tessman (ed.), Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal, New York, Springer, 2009, p. 121-146.
- Noddings, Nel, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1984.
- Purcell, Elizabeth, “Narrative Ethics and Vulnerability: Kristeva and Ricoeur on Interdependence”, Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy, vol. 21, no. 1, 2013, p. 43-59.
- Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1971.
- Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press, 1993.
- Ricoeur, Paul, Oneself as Another, translated by Kathleen Blamey, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992.
- Ricoeur, Paul, Reflections on the Just, translated by David Pellauer, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2007.
- Sen, Amartya, The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Belknap Press, 2010.
- Silvers, Anita, “Justice through Trust: Disability and the ‘outlier’ problem in social contract theory”, Ethics, vol. 116, no. 1, 2005, p. 40-76.
- Tessman, Lisa, Moral Failure, New York, Oxford University Press, 2014.
- Tissot, Damien, “Etre fidèle à soi: Féminisme, éthique et justice à la lumière de Paul Ricoeur, Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, 2013, p. 92-112.
- Tissot, Damien, “Féminisme, justice et universalisme: Esquisse d’une réconciliation dans la philosophie de Paul Ricoeur”, Philosophy Today, vol. 5, no. 4, 2014, p. 623-642.
- Tronto, Joan, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York, Routledge. 1993.
- Tronto, Joan, “Vicious Circles of Privatized Caring,” in Maurice Hamington and Dorothy C. Miller (eds.), Socializing Care, Lanham, Maryland, Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2006, p. 3-25.
- Tronto, Joan, Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality and Justice, New York, New York University Press, 2013.
- Valentini, Laura, “Ideal vs Non-Ideal: A Conceptual Map”, Philosophy Compass, 7/9, 2012, p. 654-664.
- Walker, Margaret Urban, Moral Understandings, New York, Routledge, 1998.