Abstracts
Résumé
Cet article se concentre sur les grands courants de pensée de la profession des archivistes qui ont amené le Conseil international des archives (ICA) à s’orienter vers une amélioration de ses quatre normes descriptives. L’auteur passe en revue les manifestations de la provenance, de l’ordre original et des approches basées sur le fonds, en indiquant de nombreuses positions exprimées dans la littérature professionnelle. La deuxième partie offre quelques aperçus du nouveau modèle conceptuel proposé par l’ICA pour la description archivistique, appelé Records in Contexts (Note du traducteur : les travaux à ce sujet s’étant effectués en anglais et le projet étant encore en consultation auprès de la communauté archivistique, il n’y a pas de traduction officielle du concept « Records in Contexts ». On a maintenu le terme anglophone qui équivaut à « Documents en contextes »).
Abstract
This article concentrates on the main lines of thought within the archival profession that has led the International Council on Archives to work on improving its four descriptive norms. The author reviews various positions on provenance, original order and approaches based on the concept of the fonds, as they are expressed in the professional literature. The second part of the article offers overviews of a new conceptual model for archival description proposed by the International Council, called Records in Contexts. (The author/translator notes that the works on the subject are written in English and because the project is still in a phase of consultation within the archival community, there is no standardized French equivalent for the concept «Records in Contexts». The French equivalent is «Documents en contextes».)
Appendices
Bibliographie
- BAILEY, J. (2013). Disrespect des Fonds : Rethinking Arrangement and Description in Born-Digital Archives. Archive Journal, 3(été). Repéré à http://www.archivejournal.net/issue/3/archives-remixed/disrespect-des-fonds-rethinking-arrangement-and-description-in-born-digital-archives/
- BEARMAN, D.A. et LYTLE, R.H. (1985). The Power of the Principle of Provenance. Archivaria, 21(hiver), 14-27.
- BLOUIN JR., F. et ROSENBERG, W. (2013). Processing the Past. Contesting Authority in History and the Archives. Oxford, Royaume-Uni : Oxford University Press.
- COOK, T. (1992). The Concept of Archival Fonds : Theory, Description and Provenance in the Post-Custodial Era. Dans T. M. Eastwood (dir.), The Archival fonds : from theory to practice (p. 31-86). Ottawa, Ontario : Bureau Canadien des archivistes, Comité de planification sur les normes de description.
- COX, R. J. (2004). No Innocent Deposits : Forming Archives by Rethinking Appraisals. Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Press.
- CUNNINGHAM, A. (2012, août). Peter J. Scott And The Australian ‘Series’ System : Its Origins, Features, Rationale, Impact And Continuing Relevance. Communication présentée au International Congress on Archives, Brisbane, Australie. Repéré à http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00414.pdf
- DOUGLAS, J. (2010). Origins : Evolving Ideas about the Principle of Provenance. Dans T. Eastwood et H. MacNeil (dir.), Currents of Archival Thinking (p. 23-44). Santa Barbara, CA : Libraries Unlimited.
- DURANTI, L. (1998). Diplomatics. New Uses for an Old Science. Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Press.
- EASTWOOD, T. (1990). Putting the Parts of the Whole Together : A Systematic Approach to Access to Information From the Archives of Contemporary Administration. Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Press.
- EASTWOOD, T. (2000). Putting the Parts of the Whole Together : Systematic Arrangement of Archives. Archivaria, 50 (automne), 93-116.
- GILLILAND-SWETLAND, A. (2000). Enduring Paradigm, New Opportunities : The Value of the Archival Perspective in the Digital Environment. Washington, DC : Council on Library and Information Resources. Repéré à https://clir.wordpress.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub89.pdf
- HORSMAN, P. (1994). Taming the elephant: An orthodox approach to the principle of provenance. Dans K. Abukhanfusa et J. Sydbeck (dir.), The principle of provenance : Report from the first Stockholm conference on archival theory and the principle of provenance, 2-3 September 1993 (p. 51-63). Stockholm, Suède : Swedish National Archives.
- HORSMAN, P. (2002). The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or The De-discovery of the Archival Fonds. Archivaria, 54(automne), 1-23.
- HURLEY, C. ([2005]). Parallel Provenance. Repéré à www.infotech.monash.edu.au : http://www.infotech.monash.edu.au/research/groups/rcrg/publications/parallel-provenance-combined.pdf
- HURLEY, C. (2012). Relationships in Records. Repéré à http://www.descriptionguy.com/images/WEBSITE/relationships-in-records.pdf
- ICA/CBPS. (2011). Norme générale et internationale de description archivistique (2e édition). Repéré à https://www.ica.org/fr/isadg-norme-generale-et-internationale-de-description-archivistique-deuxieme-edition
- ICA/CBPS. (2012a). Progress report for revising and harmonising ICA descriptive standards. Repéré à https://www.ica.org/en/cbps-progress-report-revising-and-harmonising-ica-descriptive-standards
- ICA/CBPS. (2012b). Relationships in archival descriptive systems. Repéré à https://www.ica.org/en/cbps-relationship-archival-descriptive-systems
- KETELAAR, E. (2002). Archival Temples, Archival Prisons : Modes of Power and Protection. Archival Science, 2, 221-238.
- KWASNIK, B. ([2000]). The Role of Classification in Knowledge Representation and Discovery. Repéré à http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1147&context=istpub
- LIVELTON, T. (1996). Archival Theory, records and the public. Lanham, MD : Society of American Archivists.
- LODOLINI, E. (2005). Archivistica (12e éd.). Milan, Italie.
- MACNEIL, H. (2008). Archivalterity : Rethinking Original Order. Archivaria, 66(automne), 1-24.
- MACNEIL, H. (2009). Trusting Description : Authenticity, Accountability, and Archival Description Standards. Journal of Archival Organization, 7, 89–107.
- MAZIKANA, P. (1990). Archives and records management for decision makers : A RAMP study. Repéré à http://www.unesco.org/webworld/ramp/html/r9008e/r9008e06.htm#5.1 (sic)
- MEEHAN, J. (2010). Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records. Archivaria, 70(automne), 27-44.
- MICHETTI, G. (2012). Archives Are Not Trees. Hierarchical Representations in Digital Environment. Dans The University of British Columbia (dir.), The Memory of the World in the Digital Age: Digitization and Preservation. An international conference on permanent access to digital documentary heritage (p. 1002-1010). Vancouver, Colombie-Britannique : The University of British Columbia.
- MILLAR, L. (2002). The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance : Archival Context in Space and Time. Archivaria, 53, 1-15.
- NESMITH, T. (2002). Seeing Archives : Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. The American Archivist, 65 (printemps/été), 24-41.
- NESMITH, T. (2005). Reopening Archives : Bringing New Contextualities into Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria, 60(automne), 259-274.
- POPOVICI, B.-F. (2007). Arhivele şi bibliotecile : surori sau cumnate ? [Archives and LIbraries : Aisters or Sisters-in-law ?]. Dans Biblio Braşov 2007. Conferinţa internaţională de biblioteconomie şiştiinţa informării (p. 323-326). Brasov, Roumanie : Universitatea “Transilvania”.
- POPOVICI, B.-F. (2014). ISAD(G). A case for improvement. Dans Technical And Field Related Problems Of Traditional And Electronic Archiving / Vsebinski Problemi Klasincnega in elektronskega arhiviranja. Maribor, Slovénie.
- SAVOJA, M. et VITALI, S. (2007). Authority Control for Creators in Italy : Theory and Practice. Journal of Archival Organization, 5(1-2), 121-147.
- STIBBE, H. L. (1992). Implementing the Concept of Fonds : Primary Access Point, Multilevel Description and Authority Control. Archivaria, 34, 109-137.
- STIBBE, H. L. (1998). Standardising Description : The Experience of Using ISAD(G). Janus, 1, 132-152.
- YEO, G. (2010). Debates about Description. Dans T. Eastwood (dir.), Currents of archival thinking (p. 89-114). Santa Barbara, CA : Libraries Unlimited.
- YEO, G. (2012). The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection. Archivaria, 73(printemps), 43–80.
- BRÜBACH, N., NAHUET, R. et SIBILLE-DE GRIMOÜARD, C. (2012). Une évolution dans les pratiques descriptives – vers un modèle conceptuel archivistique ? Arbido, (2), 4-9. Repéré à http://arbido.ch/assets/files/arbido_2_2012.pdf
- CARTIER, F. (2017, 1er février). Vers une modernisation sans précédent de la description archivistique [Billet de blogue]. Repéré à http://archives21.ebsi.umontreal.ca/2017/02/01/vers-une-modernisation-sans-precedentde-la-description-en-archivistique/ (sic)
- GUEGUEN, G., MARQUES DA FONSECA, V. M., PITTI, D. V. et SIBILLE-DE GRIMOÜARD, C. (s.d.). Vers un modèle conceptuel international pour la description archivistique. Repéré à www.ica.org/sites/default/files/EGAD_French.pdf