Abstracts
Résumé
Cet article expose les choix en matière de pratiques de recherche et les outils structurels utilisés pour mettre en oeuvre l’échantillonnage théorique, réaliser la collecte et l’analyse de données, ainsi que légitimer la pertinence de la théorisation ancrée en sciences de la gestion. Un moyen judicieux de faire ressortir la place que peut occuper la théorisation ancrée en sciences de la gestion est certes la présentation des aspects méthodologiques d’une étude ayant nécessité deux vagues successives de recherche et dont la première correspond à un cycle complet de recherche, allant de l’induction à la déduction. Dans un contexte de gestion de la structure organisationnelle dite matricielle, la première vague de recherche fait ressortir la pertinence de mener une étude portant sur les solutions au problème d’intégration des activités de l’organisation alors que la seconde a pour objet le développement d’un modèle théorique d’intégration des activités de l’organisation.
Mots-clés :
- Échantillonnage théorique,
- pratiques structurantes,
- problème d’intégration,
- structure matricielle,
- gestion de projet
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Alderfer, C. P., & Smith, K. K. (1982). Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly,27(1), 35-65.
- Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1990). Matrix management : Not a structure, a frame of mind. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 138-146.
- Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance : Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 779-801.
- Beech, N. (2000). Narrative styles of managers and workers. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(2), 210-228.
- Cackowski, D., Najdawi, M. K., & Chung, Q. B. (2000). Object analysis in organizational design : A solution for matrix organizations. Project Management Journal, 31(3), 44-51.
- Carpenter-Anderson, C., & Fleming, M. M. K. (1990). Management control in an engineering matrix organization : A project engineer’s perspective. Industrial Management, 32(2), 8-13.
- Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory : Objectivist and constructivist methods. Dans N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Éds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-535). London : Sage.
- Charmaz, K. (2004). Grounded theory. Dans S. N. Hesse-Biber, & P. Leavy (Éds), Approaches to qualitative research (pp. 496-521). New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
- Clardy, A. (2000). Learning on their own : Vocationally oriented self-directed learning projects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(2), 105-125.
- Davis, S. M., & Lawrence, P. R. (1977). Matrix. London : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- Davis, S. M., & Lawrence, P. R. (1978). Problems of matrix organizations. Harvard Business Review, 56(3), 131-142.
- De Laat, P. B. (1994). Matrix management of projects and power struggles : A case study of an R&D laboratory. Human Relations, 47(9), 1089-1119.
- Dunn, S. C. (2001). Motivation by project and functional managers in matrix organizations. Engineering Management Journal, 13(2), 3-9.
- El-Najdawi, M. K., & Liberatore, M. J. (1997). Matrix management effectiveness : An update for research and engineering organizations. Project Management Journal, 28(1), 25-31.
- Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions : A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699-738.
- Ford, R. C., & Randolph, W. A. (1992). Cross-functional structures : A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 267-294.
- Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA : The Sociology Press.
- Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory : Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA : The Sociology Press.
- Glaser, B. G. (2014). Choosing grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review, 13(2), 3-19.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York, NY : Aldine Publishing Company.
- Goold, M., & Campbell, A. (2003). Making matrix structures work : Creating clarity on unit roles and responsibility. European Management Journal, 21(3), 351-372.
- Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds : How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 7-41.
- Johnston, R., & Mehra, S. (2002). Best-practice complaint management. Academy of Management Executive, 16(4), 145-154.
- Jones, R. E., & Deckro, R. F. (1993). The social psychology of project management conflict. European Journal of Operational Research, 64(2), 216-228.
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
- Knight, A. D., Griffith, A., & King, A. P. (2002). Supply side short-circuiting in design and build projects. Management Decision, 40(7), 655-662.
- Kuprenas, J. A. (2003). Implementation and performance of a matrix organization structure. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 51-67.
- Maritan, C. A. (2001). Capital investment as investing in organizational capabilities : An empirically grounded process model. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 513-532.
- Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986). Grounded theory and organizational research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 141-157.
- Mohrman, S. A., Tenkasi, R. V., & Mohrman Jr., A. M. (2003). The role of networks in fundamental organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 301-323.
- Newton, D., Hase, S., & Ellis, A. (2002). Effective implementation of online learning : A case study of the Queensland mining industry. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(4), 156-165.
- Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change : Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 309-340.
- Paillé, P. (1994). L’analyse par théorisation ancrée. Cahier de recherche sociologique, 23, 147-181.
- Pappu, M., & Mundy, R. A. (2002). Understanding strategic transportation buyer-seller relationships from an organizational learning perspective : A grounded theory approach. Transportation Journal, 41(4), 36-50.
- Robins, M. J. (1993). Effective project management in a matrix-management environment. International Journal of Project Management, 11(1), 11-14.
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research : Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London : Sage.
- Turner, B. A. (1983). The use of grounded theory for the qualitative analysis of organizational behaviour. Journal of Management Studies, 20(3), 333-348.
- Whetstone, J. T. (2001). How virtue fits within business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 101-113.
- Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspective for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18, 225-320.