Abstracts
Riassunto
L’autogestione urbana è un’attività che può essere faticosa e non sempre sostenibile a lungo termine. Questo perché, oltre alle attività normalmente associate alla militanza, si aggiungono quelle relative alla gestione e manutenzione di uno spazio fisico. A partire da una ricerca condotta con lɜ attivistɜ di cinque spazi autogestiti di Roma, ho analizzato i meccanismi che spiegano perché alcune persone continuino a militare per anni, nonostante tutto, mentre altre facciano la scelta di andarsene. Ne è emerso che la scelta di andare o restare è il risultato di un delicato e complesso equilibrio fra forze centripete (che trattengono lɜ attivistɜ) e forze centrifughe (che lɜ spingono a lasciare). Per evitare che l’ago della bilancia tenda verso queste ultime, gli spazi autogestiti devono riuscire ad essere non soltanto spazi di lotta o di incontro, ma anche di ‘cura’, il che può contribuire a rendere queste esperienze non soltanto utili ma anche umanamente sostenibili.
Parole chiave:
- autogestione urbana,
- sostenibilità umana,
- care,
- beni comuni,
- movimenti urbani
Abstract
Urban self-management is an activity that can be tiring and not always sustainable in the long term. This is because, in addition to the activities normally associated with militancy, there are also those related to the management and maintenance of a physical space. Starting from a research conducted with the activists of five self-managed spaces in Rome, I analysed the mechanisms that explain why some people continue to be militant for years, despite everything, while others make the choice to leave. It emerged that the choice to go or stay is the result of a delicate and complex balance between centripetal forces (which hold the activists back) and centrifugal forces (which push them to leave). In order to avoid the needle of the balance tending towards the latter, self-managed spaces must succeed in being not only spaces of struggle or encounter, but also spaces of ‘care’, which can contribute to making these experiences not only useful but also humanly sustainable.
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliografia
- Anderson, Ben. 2009. “Affective atmospheres,” Emotion, Space and Society 2 (2): 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005.
- Brown, Gavin, e Jenny Pickerill. 2009. “Space for emotion in the spaces of activism,” Emotion, Space and Society, Activism and Emotional Sustainability, 2 (1): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.03.004.
- Campagnari, Francesco, e Alice Ranzini. 2022. “Rigenerazione urbana dal basso tra paradigma e ambiguità: verso una agenda di ricerca,” Tracce urbane. Rivista italiana transdisciplinare di studi urbani 8 (12): 6–21. https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562/18258.
- Carmo, Leticia. 2020. Esthétiques de la résistance et du recyclage. In La contre-culture domestiquée. Art, espace et politique dans la ville gentrifiée, a cura di Luca Pattaroni, 149–74. Ginevra: MétisPresse.
- Caro, Mathilde. 2020. “Éprouver l’attachement au lieu : l’épreuve d’un conflit de proximité,” L’Espace Politique. Revue en ligne de géographie politique et de géopolitique, fasc. 38 (febbraio): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4000/espacepolitique.6696.
- Cellamare, Carlo, (a cura di). 2014. S.M.U.R. - Roma città autoprodotta - ricerca urbana e linguaggi artistici. Roma: Manifestolibri.
- Cox, Laurence. 2011. How Do We Keep Going? Activist Burnout and Personal Sustainability in Social Movements. Helsinki: Into-ebooks. https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/2815/.
- Di Feliciantonio, Cesare. 2017. “Spaces of the Expelled as Spaces of the Urban Commons? Analysing the Re-Emergence of Squatting Initiatives in Rome,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41 (5): 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12513.
- Di Feliciantonio, Cesare. 2018. “L’amore alla guida degli spazi di messa in comune?,” ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 17 (2): 454–479.
- Gaxie, Daniel. 2005. “Rétributions Du Militantisme et Paradoxes de l’action Collective,” Swiss Political Science Review 11 (1): 157–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2005.tb00051.x.
- Jasper, James M. 2011. “Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research,” Annual Review of Sociology 37 (1): 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015.
- King, Debra. 2005. Sustaining activism through emotional reflexivity. In Emotions and Social Movements, a cura di Helena Flam e Debra King, 150–169. Milton Park: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
- Kohn, Margaret. 2003. Radical Space: Building the House of the People. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Lancione, Michele. 2017. “Revitalising the Uncanny: Challenging Inertia in the Struggle against Forced Evictions,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (6): 1012–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817701731.
- Membretti, Andrea, e Pierpaolo Mudu. 2013. Where Local meets Global. Italian Social Centres and the Alterglobalization Movement. In Understanding European Movements: New Social Movements, Global Justice Struggle, Anti-Austerity Protests, a cura di Cristina Flesher Fominaya e Laurence Cox. Londra: Routledge.
- Moroni, Primo, Daniele Farina e Pino Tripodi (a cura di). 1995. Centri Sociali: che impresa! Oltre il ghetto: un dibattito cruciale. Roma: Castelvecchi.
- Mudu, Pierpaolo. 2012. “I Centri Sociali italiani: verso tre decadi di occupazioni e di spazi autogestiti,”. Partecipazione e conflitto 1: 69–92. https://doi.org/10.3280/PACO2012-001004.
- Nardis, Chiara, Serena Olcuire, e Laura Fortuna. 2022. “Dai territori marginali alla città. Esercizi per trasformare esperienze virtuose in possibilità di pianificazione,” Tracce urbane. Rivista italiana transdisciplinare di studi urbani 8 (12): 41–68. https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562/18127.
- Nolas, Sevasti-Melissa, Christos Varvantakis, e Vinnarasan Aruldoss. 2017. “Political Activism across the Life Course,” Contemporary Social Science 12 (1–2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2017.1336566.
- Olson, Mancur. 1965/2003. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Pruijt, Hans. 2012. “The Logic of Urban Squatting,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (1): 19–45.
- Pudal, Bernard, e Olivier Fillieule. 2010. Sociologie du militantisme. In Penser les mouvements sociaux: conflits sociaux et contestation dans les sociétés contemporaines, a cura di Olivier Fillieule, Eric Agrikoliansky, e Isabelle Sommier, 163–84. Recherches. Parigi : La Découverte.
- Thibaud, Jean-Paul. 2015. En quête d’ambiances: éprouver la ville en passant. Ginevra: MétisPresses.
- Traïni, Christophe, (a cura di). 2009. Emotions... mobilisation! Parigi: Presses de Sciences Po.
- Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1974. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Engleweood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Wilkinson, Eleanor. 2017. “On Love as an (Im)Properly Political Concept,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (1): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816658887
- Wilkinson, Eleanor, and Iliana Ortega-Alcázar. 2019. “The Right to Be Weary? Endurance and Exhaustion in Austere Times,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (1): 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12266.
- Williams, Simon J. 2001. Emotion and Social Theory: Corporeal Refelctions on the (Ir)Rational. Londra: Sage Publications.