Résumés
Résumé
La cyberintimidation est une forme de violence de plus en plus préoccupante pour la société et pour le milieu scolaire. Souvent commises dans Internet ou sur le téléphone cellulaire, les agressions ont des conséquences psychologiques, sociales et scolaires très graves chez les victimes, les agresseurs et les témoins, et il est important d’intervenir adéquatement. Cette étude vise à mieux connaître les types d’intervention utilisés par les enseignants auprès des élèves qui ont des comportements de cyberintimidation et à mieux comprendre les bases qui expliquent ces choix d’intervention. Des entrevues menées auprès de 10 enseignants des 7e, 8e et 9e années ont permis de relever leurs interventions les plus courantes pour gérer et traiter les comportements de cyberintimidation de leurs élèves, connaître leur perception de l’efficacité de ces pratiques et explorer les fondements théoriques sur lesquels ils s’appuient dans leurs choix d’intervention. L’analyse de leurs témoignages, mise en perspective avec la littérature scientifique sur le sujet, permet de proposer un nouveau modèle d’intervention auprès des auteurs de cyberintimidation. Après avoir confronté les résultats au modèle d’intervention d’Hinduja et Patchin (2009), les auteures suggèrent de nouvelles pistes d’intervention pour améliorer la formation des enseignants dans ce domaine.
Mots-clés :
- cyberintimidation,
- cyberintimidateurs,
- intervention des enseignants,
- pratiques éducatives
Abstract
Cyberbullying is a form of online violence that is of growing concern in our society and in the school environment. In light of the fact that the aggressions, made on the Internet and on cellular phones, can have serious psychological, social and academic consequences for the victims, the bystanders and the cyberbullies, it is important to intervene appropriately. This study aims to understand teachers’ perception of their interventions with students who cyberbully and the theoretical basis or concepts guiding these interventions. Semi-structured interviews, conducted with ten teachers of grades 7, 8 and 9, revealed the most popular reactions of teachers to their students’ cyberbullying behaviours. This study also explores the basis influencing the teachers’ choices of interventions and their perception of the effectiveness of these practices. The analysis of the teachers’ accounts, put in perspective with a literature review, suggests ways to improve their training to address cyberbullying. A new intervention model is suggested.
Keywords:
- cyberbullying,
- cyberbullies,
- teachers’ intervention,
- educational practices
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Andreou, E. (2006) Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27, 339-351. doi:10.1177/0143034306067287
- Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41, 387-397. doi:10.1007/s10578-010-0176
- Bandura, A. (2003). Auto-efficacité : le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle. Bruxelles, Belgique : De Boeck.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic fonctionning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206-1222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01791.x
- Beaumont, C. (2009, novembre). Des actions collectives pour influencer le développement social des jeunes. Conférence d’ouverture prononcée dans le cadre du Forum provincial organisé par le ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport sur la violence à l’école. Québec, Canada.
- Belsky, J. (1995) Expanding the ecology of human development: An evolutionary perspective. Dans P. Moen, G. Elder jr et K. Luscher (dir.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 545-561). Récupéré de http://psycnet.apa.org.ezproxy.bibl.ulaval.ca/books/10176/015. doi:10.1037/10176-015
- Bhat, C. S. (2008). Cyber bullying: Overview and strategies for school counsellors, guidance officers, and all school personnel. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 8(1), 53-56. doi:10.1375/ajgc.18.1.53
- Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (2000). Social intelligence – Empathy = aggression? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(2), 191-200. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00029-9
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. Dans P. Moen, G. Elder jr et K. Luscher (dir.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619-647). Récupéré de http://psycnet.apa.org.ezproxy.bibl.ulaval.ca/books/10176/018. doi:10.1037/10176-018
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological theory. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568-586. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.568
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 1(9), 116-125. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00114
- Calvete, E., Orue, I., Villardón, A. E., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128-1135. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017
- Cassidy, W., Jackson, M., & Brown, K. N. (2009). Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? School Psychology International, 30(4), 383-402. doi:10.1177/0143034309106948
- Conway, K. P., & McCord, J. (2002). A longitudinal examination of the relation between co-offenders with violent accomplices and violent crime. Aggressive Behavior, 28(2), 97-108. doi:10.1002/ab.90011
- Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Yougsters’ experience and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217-222. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0008
- Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007). The ecology development and change. Dans Intervening children’s lives: An ecological family-centered approach to mental health care (pp. 15-29). Washington, DC : American Psychology Association. doi:10.1037/11485-002
- Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12(1), 109-125. doi:10.1177/1461444809341260
- Gauthier, B. (2008). Recherche sociale : de la problématique à la collecte de données (5e éd.). Montréal, Canada : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2009). Punishment and beyond: Achieving justice through the satisfaction of multiple goals. Law and Society Association, 43(1), 1-37. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00365.x
- Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 206-621. doi:10.1080/13811118.2010.494133
- Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard. Thousand Oakes, CA : Corwin Press.
- Johnson, G. M. (2010). Internet use and child development: Validation of the ecology techno-subsystem. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 176-185.
- Joliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 540-550. doi:10.1002/ab.20154
- Jones, S. E., Manstead, A. S. R., & Livingstone, A. G. (2011). Ganging up or sticking together? Group processes and children’s responses to text-message bullying. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 71-96. doi:10.1348/000712610x502826
- Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Gould, M. (2010). The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research finding. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 55(5), 282-288.
- König, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Steffgen, G. (2010). Cyberbullying as an act of revenge? Australian Journal of Guidance & Couselling, 20(2), 210-224. doi:10.1375/ajgc.20.2.210
- Leray, C. (2008). L’analyse de contenu de la théorie à la pratique. Montréal, Canada : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Malti, T., Perren, S., & Buchmann, M. (2009). Children’s peer victimization, empathy, and emotional symptoms. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41, 98-113. doi:10.1007/s10578-009-0155-8
- O’Brennan, L. M., Bradshaw, C. P., & Sawyer, A. L. (2009). Examining developmental differences in the social-emotional problems among frequent bullies, victims, bully/victims. Psychology Schools, 46(2), 100-114. doi:10.1002/pits.20357
- Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2003). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris, France : Armand Colin.
- Paul, S., Smith, P. K., & Blumbert, H. H. (2010). Adressing cyberbullying in school using the quality circle approach. Australian Journal of Guidance & Couselling, 20(2), 157-168. doi:10.1375/ajgc.20.2.157
- Piaget, J. (2009). Children’s understanding of causality. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 207-224. (Article initialement paru en 1928 dans British Journal of Psychology, 18, 276-301.)
- Prud’homme, D. (2008). Violences entre enfants : casse-tête pour les parents. Montréal, Canada : Remue-ménage.
- Royer, E. (2005). Comme un caméléon sur une jupe écossaise ou Comment enseigner à des jeunes difficiles sans s’épuiser. Québec, Canada : École et comportement.
- Sela-Shayovits, R. (2009). Dealing with school violence: The effect of school violence prevention training on teachers’ self-efficacy in dealing with violent events. Teaching and Teachers Education, 25, 1061-1066. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.010
- Shariff, S. (2005). Cyber-dilemmas in the new millennium: School obligations to provide student safety in a virtual school environment. McGill Journal of Education, 40(3), 457-477.
- Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? ScandanavianJournal of Psychology, 49, 147-154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x
- Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvahlo, M., Fisher, S., Russel, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact on secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
- Sourander, A., Klomek, A. B., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, …Helenius, H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population based study. Archives of General Psychiatry. 67(7), 720-728. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79
- Suzuki, H., & Lucas, L. R. (2010). Chronic passive exposure to aggression escalates aggressiveness of rat observers. Aggressive Behavior, 36(1), 54-66. doi:10.1002/ab.20333
- Vandebosch, H., & van Cleemput, K. (2008). Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 499-50. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0042
- Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2011). Cyberbullying: Predicting victimization and perpetration. Children & Society, 25, 59-72. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00260.x